User talk:Sanpitch

ZenCash(Cryptocurrency) New Unreviewed Article
I would appreciate your help to review and cleaning my brand new article. I would really appreciate your expericen and comments to improve it

Regards

--Fergus_Manx 00:06, 10 February 2018 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by SpaceMAN (talk • contribs)

Speedy deletion nomination of Michelle Peralta
When you add the Hangon tag, you need to mention on the article talk page why you feel this is a notable subject for Wikipedia. Tentontunic (talk) 00:03, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
 * done Sanpitch (talk) 00:07, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
 * I moved the content to Jimmer Fredette in a section about the extensive media attention that he has received. I guess the article will be deleted soon. Sanpitch (talk) 02:19, 10 February 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of T. Russell Shields


The article T. Russell Shields has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners or ask at Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. Regards, SunCreator (talk) 22:56, 5 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Done.Sanpitch (talk) 04:55, 10 June 2011 (UTC)

Lead section of Linguistic relativity
Hello, Sanpitch. You recently added a 'lead too long' maintenance tag to Linguistic relativity. The length and content of that lead section has been something of a sore spot in the past, as can be seen from Talk:Linguistic relativity.

I'm not quite sure if your objection is just raw word-count, or if you find the section confusing or otherwise unhelpful. If you'd like to leave a note at the talk page, either in the section I mentioned or in a new section, I'm sure that would be most appreciated. Thanks, and happy editing. Cnilep (talk) 02:56, 30 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Thank you! Cnilep (talk) 03:46, 30 November 2011 (UTC)

Entropic gravity
You've misunderstood by edit and edit summary. Of course it works as a theory of gravity. It's simply that it had the wrong defaultsort. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 03:13, 16 December 2011 (UTC)
 * You're welcome. In fact, it's pretty much my favourite theory of gravity, which is why I wanted to ensure that people could find in the theories of gravity category. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 06:04, 16 December 2011 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification
Hi. When you recently edited List of RadioWest Episodes, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Bob Bennett and Adam Davidson (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:59, 11 February 2012 (UTC)

Reverted you at Talk:Quadrature amplitude modulation
It's not a good idea to respond to an ancient obsolete talk item high up on a page, with a statement that you're confused. So I reverted that. If you'd like to say something that we should consider about improving the article, then start a new talk section at the bottom. Thanks. Dicklyon (talk) 16:55, 18 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Then archive the talk items!! Don't revert my perfectly reasonable suggestion.  I am not confused, it's the article which is making a perfectly simple thing confusing! Sanpitch (talk) 21:53, 18 February 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification
Hi. When you recently edited List of RadioWest episodes, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Steve James (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 20:13, 18 February 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 22
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited RadioWest (KUER), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Steve James (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:16, 22 November 2012 (UTC)

Chief Sanpitch in Bear River Massacre
You changed a link in the Bear River Massacre article to point to the Chief Sanpitch article about a Ute chief. This is an interesting change because I had always considered, given the context given in the historical literature that mentioned Sanpitch in regards to the Bear River Massacre, that he was Shoshone... or at least the person involved in the federal indictment in 1862-3 under the name Sanpitch was a Shoshone chief.

Mind you, it may be one and the same person, or it could be two different people. Besides simply the common name, are you aware of any other historical records or any indication that this may be the same person or that a person named Sanpitch as a Ute chief either claimed or his descendents claimed that he had a connection to the Cache Valley Shoshone tribes? The geographical proximity certainly isn't too far off, but there certainly was a difference between the Utes and the Shoshone tribes and just seems a little odd to me. I'm not even suggesting your edit was done in error, but it did strike me as something that could use some additional information to confirm the person involved with this event in Cache Valley is in fact the same person who was a Ute chief. --Robert Horning (talk) 06:27, 15 February 2013 (UTC)


 * Robert, It looks like they are two different people. A PDF at USU says that the Bear River Sanpitch lived after the death of the Sanpete County Sanpitch.  I guess Sanpitch could be a common Ute name at that time. I removed the link I put in, the Bear River Massacre page is as it was previously. Note that Sanpitch now goes to a disambiguation page that mentions both Sanpitches.  Sanpitch (talk) 15:50, 15 February 2013 (UTC)


 * Thank you for your efforts in this regard. It is making Wikipedia better through this action :) --Robert Horning (talk) 03:03, 17 February 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 8
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited San Pitch River, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ute (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:10, 8 June 2013 (UTC)

Talkback
Jprg1966  (talk)  04:46, 17 December 2013 (UTC)

By the way, you can request to have the edit deleted. See WP:REVDEL. -- Jprg1966  (talk)  05:08, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
 * I nuked it a while ago. Sanpitch, it dismays me that the user has continued to vandalize innocent users' pages. I'm sorry that you have been affected by it, and we'll continue to do what we can to control the vandal. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 15:26, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Thanks DoRD!! Sanpitch (talk) 17:25, 17 December 2013 (UTC)

authorlink= in citation templates
Most of the citation templates like cite web have a parameter like authorlink which can be used to link the author to a Wikipedia article. I fixed up SatoshiDice already. Please fix up any other pages where you've used first, last, or a similar parameter to have the first and last names as a Wikilinked entry. Thanks. davidwr/ (talk)/(contribs)  23:48, 25 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Thanks! I fixed similar mistakes elsewhere. Sanpitch (talk) 16:12, 26 January 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 26
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Vitalik Buterin, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page New Yorker (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:04, 26 January 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of Nick Szabo for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nick Szabo is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Nick Szabo until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. &mdash; TORTOISE WRATH  05:22, 6 March 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of Ethereum for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ethereum is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Ethereum until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Citation Needed &#x007C;  Talk  00:07, 10 April 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 11
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of unsolved problems in information theory, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Network. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:32, 11 July 2014 (UTC)

July 2014
Your user page User:Sanpitch/sandbox, by reason of its contents, was accidentally included in a content category. It has been corrected for you. For information about this, please see the guidelines about the categorization of user pages. I corrected the categories by adding a colon inside the left bracket. – S. Rich (talk) 21:00, 17 July 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 28
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Steve Randy Waldman, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Danish. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 28 July 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:03, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:03, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

A kitten for you!
Ethereum!

Legionof7 (talk) 04:45, 21 March 2016 (UTC) 

Ethereum
Hi there, Sanpitch. Based on your recent comment on the Ethereum Talk page, I think you should go ahead and restore the material. There never was a consensus achieved for its removal. I restored it once, and initiated a WP:BRD discussion. D. Gerard then went and edit warred, took it out again. I chose not to edit war with him. But another editor may restore the improperly removed material, without the issue of edit warring surfacing. Just don't do it three times. I'll keep watching that page as well. Cheers. N2e (talk) 04:38, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
 * This is inappropriate and a clear violation of WP:GANG. Please don't do this in the future. Jytdog (talk) 05:46, 28 April 2016 (UTC)

No personal attacks
Hello, I'm Jytdog. I noticed that you made a comment on the page Talk:Ethereum that didn't seem very civil, so it has been removed. Wikipedia is built on collaboration, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. ]

Please feel free to !vote again, with out the personal attack. Thanks. Jytdog (talk) 05:45, 28 April 2016 (UTC)

Merger discussion for Vitalik Buterin
An article that you have been involved in editing&mdash;Vitalik Buterin &mdash;has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. Jtbobwaysf (talk) 16:20, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

Warning

 * 1) You have declared a conflict of interest with regard to Ethereum here.
 * 2) You !voted in the merger discussion here, emotionally, and giving no rationale based on policy of guideline and making a personal attack.  I removed your vote and gave you warning above.
 * 3) you !voted again here, again emotionally and without offering an argument based on policy/guidelines (but without the personal attack, so that was a step up).
 * 4) after having !voted, you closed the merger proposal here.  This was not appropriate, and I reverted.   There is no reason to close it yet, and having !voted, you should not be the one to close it.  That was shocking; everybody here knows that you don't close a discussion you voted in.

If you cannot restrain yourself and work in Wikipedia in a civil manner according to content and behavior norms, the community will take action against you. Please stop editing disruptively. Thanks. Jytdog (talk) 06:41, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
 * About this. I am dead serious. That close was inappropriate.  You are obviously conflicted.  If you cannot restrain yourself we will need to seek a topic ban.  I am trying to give you a heads up that you  are driving over a cliff.  You are of course free to do whatever you like.   Jytdog (talk) 08:09, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
 * You said I was trying to be a lawyer, but I thought I was just following the rules. Sanpitch (talk) 08:16, 1 May 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of List of EconTalk episodes for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of EconTalk episodes is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/List of EconTalk episodes until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Guy (Help!) 09:26, 8 April 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 18
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Lisp (programming language), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Scheme ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Lisp_%28programming_language%29 check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Lisp_%28programming_language%29?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:32, 18 June 2018 (UTC)

Asimov issue
You’re welcome. Interesting issue. Mr Serjeant Buzfuz (talk) 01:29, 14 January 2020 (UTC)

Editing of talk pages
Today you deleted some of your posts from Talk:Julia (programming language). Perhaps you felt that no one responded to them promptly enough. But we are all busy, both on Wikipedia and in real life. Please do not delete such posts, but just let them sit. I, for one, appreciated your response to my post, even if I haven't acted on it yet. Mgnbar (talk) 03:00, 27 February 2020 (UTC)

"Jeff Bezanson" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Jeff Bezanson. Since you had some involvement with the Jeff Bezanson redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Bruno H Vieira (talk) 18:25, 6 April 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:39, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of List of RadioWest episodes (2010)


The article List of RadioWest episodes (2010) has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Does not pass WP:NLIST and a redirect doesn't really make sense with the disambiguating qualifier '(2010)'. TipsyElephant (talk) 21:59, 31 January 2023 (UTC)"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TipsyElephant (talk) 21:59, 31 January 2023 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of List of RadioWest episodes (2011)


The article List of RadioWest episodes (2011) has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Does not pass WP:NLIST and I don't think it makes sense to redirect."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TipsyElephant (talk) 15:51, 1 February 2023 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of List of RadioWest episodes (2012)


The article List of RadioWest episodes (2012) has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Does not pass WP:NLIST and I don't think it makes sense to redirect."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TipsyElephant (talk) 15:56, 1 February 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:36, 28 November 2023 (UTC)