User talk:Sanskari/Archive 12

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 01:12, 1 January 2015 (UTC)

Happy New Year Cutest Penguin!


Happy New Year! Cutest Penguin, Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.

– Davey 2010 Merry Xmas / Happy New Year 01:15, 1 January 2015 (UTC)

Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year 2015}} to user talk pages.

The Signpost: 31 December 2014

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:10, 2 January 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Electronic cigarette
You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Electronic cigarette. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:03, 3 January 2015 (UTC)

Interview for The Signpost
This is being sent to you as a member of WikiProject Articles for creation

The WikiProject Report would like to focus on WikiProject Articles for creation for a Signpost article. This is an excellent opportunity to draw attention to your efforts and attract new members to the project. Would you be willing to participate in an interview? If so, here are the questions for the interview. Just add your response below each question and feel free to skip any questions that you don't feel comfortable answering. Multiple editors will have an opportunity to respond to the interview questions, so be sure to sign your answers. If you know anyone else who would like to participate in the interview, please share this with them. Thanks,  Rcsprinter123    (relate)  @ 20:53, 4 January 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Bitcoin
You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Bitcoin. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:03, 6 January 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:White supremacy
Hello! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:White supremacy. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated.

For tips, please see. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:04, 9 January 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 07 January 2015

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:39, 9 January 2015 (UTC)

Sonali Raut
please see, WP:DISINFOBOX. Ch an  de r  08:33, 10 January 2015 (UTC)

National Centre for Excellence
Hi pls reverse all the changes done by Primefac to National Centre for Excellence as he has almost deleted the entire text leaving just the Introduction section. If you wish yo can put it it the way I gave it to during the AfC time but don't leave it in this condition. If u wish u can delete the new section i created that is the Student's council. Thanks Rahulmdinesh
 * Always sign your post. — CutestPenguinHangout 09:04, 10 January 2015 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 16:36, 11 January 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Jimi Hendrix
Hello! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Jimi Hendrix. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated.

For tips, please see. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:04, 12 January 2015 (UTC)

Help needed with a draft you have reviewed
Ish malhotra (talk) 05:13, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Hi, I want to re-work this draft and needed your help with that. Could you perhaps quote a statement from the article where the tone is not neutral? Similarly, it would be great if you can give some examples of peacock terms used in this draft. Lastly, I understand that some sources here should simply be removed/replaced. Could you please help me with that? Tell me which sources are not credible at all so that I remove the source or even the data if need be?Ish malhotra (talk) 05:13, 6 January 2015 (UTC)


 * Eagerly awaiting your response! Ish malhotra (talk) 06:47, 12 January 2015 (UTC)

National Centre for Excellence
Hello cutest penguin, i had when as rahulmdinesh subitted National Centre for Excellence for reviewing you had accepted it. But now user called primefac has blocked me and made the article very short. I urge you to do something as there are many other school articles which have similar content as i had put. Example Little Flower Public School,Acharya Pathasala Public School, Nagarjuna Vidyaniketan. Please do something as you have admin privileges. I've got one more refrencing today in the TOI - .Indianboy12345 (talk) 01:36, 12 January 2015 (UTC)
 * The action was taken as per Wikipedia's policy. You are requested to add the contents only if you have reliable sources to verify the facts and information on the article. — Cute<b style="color:#00A300">st</b><b style="color:#0A47FF">Penguin</b><sup style="font-size:50%">Hangout 09:45, 12 January 2015 (UTC)

Tech News: 2015-03
<section begin="technews-2015-W03"/> Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.

Recent software changes
 * Rotated PDF files in landscape format used to show too small. They will now display correctly. You may need to purge older files.
 * You can now use the  magic word instead of Template:!. Many wikis used the template to create a pipe  in tables and templates. You can delete the template.

Software changes this week
 * The new version of MediaWiki ( 1.25wmf14 ) has been on test wikis and MediaWiki.org since January 7. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis from January 13. It will be on all Wikipedias from January 14 (calendar).
 * A bug in VisualEditor sometimes added a  (Sun) character. This is now fixed.
 * The search and replace tool in VisualEditor is now much faster in long pages.
 * The TemplateData editor now uses the same design as VisualEditor.
 * The  option is now shown in your language in the help of the classic editor toolbar.

Future changes
 * You can sign up to answer questions from designers. It will help them make editing easier.

Tech news prepared by tech ambassadors and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe. <section end="technews-2015-W03"/> 16:47, 12 January 2015 (UTC)

15:45:20, 8 January 2015 review of submission by Patience62
Hello, thanks for your feedback, however I have to say I am struggling to understand your reasons for decline.

I proposed the changes to an original page because previous submissions regarding proxy advisors were indeed just an advert for one firm and did not reflect the global situation nor the variations of service provision from the various participants. In this version I have attempted to be neutral by adding all industry participant names as taken from an industry association website: http://bppgrp.info Furthermore I have added balance by talking about controversy over the industry citing regulatory materials. This list of activities undertaken is a factual list also taken from the industry literature which is clearly referenced in the footnotes.

Please can you outline your concerns in more detail so that they can be addressed.

By way of reference please see this page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proxy_firm which the current draft is intended to replace.

Thank you for your patience. Kind regards

Patience62 (talk) 15:45, 8 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Your draft is more of like an advertisement and its reflecting promotional activity which is not appreciated on English Wikipedia. Well, there are several issues with your draft which includes lack of reliable sources to verify notability as well as it is requested that kindly maintain neutral point of view while contributing. — <b style="color:#D60047">C</b><b style="color:#F0A000">ute</b><b style="color:#00A300">st</b><b style="color:#0A47FF">Penguin</b><sup style="font-size:50%">Hangout 15:54, 9 January 2015 (UTC)

Thank you very much for your response, however I am not sure that we are making much progress on mutual understanding. Reliable Sources: Regarding "reliable sources", the articles are from major English-speaking financial newspapers and other verifiable national sources e.g. New York Times, Footnote 9 is from the US Securities & Exchange Commission (SEC) and there is a link to the US Government Accountability Office. Being financial industry regulators those two are about as high quality as is possible in financial services, why are those not acceptable? The BPP Group web site is the result of a European Securities Market Association (ESMA)regulatory review of the industry. ESMA is the European equivalent of the SEC. I am struggling to understand why these sources would not meet the criteria for a reliable sources given that they are regulators?

Neutrality: The article is balanced by the fact that there are facts which which are pro the industry and anti the industry - and these are attributed to specific sources. Could you clarify why this approach is not considered a neutral PoV?

Promotional: I am not clear why you believe it is a "promotion" to list the activities of a proxy advisor when, for example, the entry for Stockbroker also adds a list of activities https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stockbroker In terms of the existing article on proxy firms then that is indeed little better than an advertisement as it does not mention all the global constituents and puts an undue focus on one firm. This version is balanced on the basis that all the relevant vendors are included.

I look forward to understanding your PoV better in due course, in the meantime, perhaps given the technical nature of the subject matter we should consider inviting a third party to joint the debate and review the article. I am not trying to get into an edit war, just to get to the bottom of the problem. Patience62 (talk) 17:40, 12 January 2015 (UTC)

Request on 12:14:12, 14 January 2015 for assistance on AfC submission by LBCYP
My recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! The submission has not been accepted because of copyrighted information, which is not permitted on Wikipedia. Can you indicate the copyright information please? I want to create a page and it seems to be very difficult, whats wrong with the content of my page?I am new in Wikipedia --LBCYP (talk) 12:14, 14 January 2015 (UTC)LBCYP--LBCYP (talk) 12:14, 14 January 2015 (UTC)

LBCYP (talk) 12:14, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
 * You can check the copyvio here. — <b style="color:#D60047">C</b><b style="color:#F0A000">ute</b><b style="color:#00A300">st</b><b style="color:#0A47FF">Penguin</b><sup style="font-size:50%">Hangout 13:15, 14 January 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:9/11 Truth movement
Hello! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:9/11 Truth movement. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated.

For tips, please see. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:05, 15 January 2015 (UTC)