User talk:Sbf1998

Welcome!
I want to say their are other contributors on here and I need the highest ranking person to tell me what I am suppose to do than some other contributor that I have no info on as credibility wise. I am sorry but in the news and other places as of job wise whose going to believe who you know. Another worker cannot be the boss the supervisor is suppose to be the boss or manager.

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Editing tutorial
 * Picture tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Naming conventions
 * Simplified Manual of Style

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! Cindy ( talk ) 04:02, 22 December 2013 (UTC)

Your request to be an admin
If you want to be an admin, then may I suggest that you read some of the following:
 * Administrators' reading list
 * Guide to requests for adminship
 * Successful requests for adminship
 * Unsuccessful adminship candidacies

There are no fixed criteria for adminship - you need to be able to show that you will make a good admin through your history. As a rough guide, standards for adminship are  - I don't think that I am too far away from what the average editor is looking for!

Finally, you might want to read the essay What adminship is not - being an admin does not make you a more important or senior editor... it really is a maintenance thing! If Wikipedia was a University, admins would not be students or professors, they would be the janitors. They are essential to the smooth running of Wikipedia, but not important in and of themselves - and in fact, it can be stressful to be an admin!

Regards, ChamithN   (talk)  18:49, 6 April 2016 (UTC)

Confused
Hi - Thanks for reviewing Mary Ann Parker. I'm afraid I'm confused by the tags you've put on it, since it seems to me to be well-referenced and obviously not an autobiography. Can I assume there's been a misunderstanding? Lelijg (talk) 15:36, 7 April 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for your message. I still feel sure there must be some mistake. Why do you mention Shakespeare? I have used verifiable sources, even though they are print, not web-based (not unusual for some topics). Why do you suggest the Oxford Dictionary of National Biography and the other academic sources lack credibility? If you think my experience matters, you will be able to see that I have been contributing content to Wikipedia for several years. Lelijg (talk) 16:32, 7 April 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Lowell Ponte


A tag has been placed on Lowell Ponte, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a foreign language article that was copied and pasted from another Wikimedia project, or was transwikied out to another project. Please see Translation to learn about requests for, and coordination of, translations from foreign-language Wikipedias into English.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. CAPTAIN RAJU ( ✉ ) 17:31, 7 April 2016 (UTC)

Reference errors on 7 April
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. as follows: Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/RBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/RBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=ReferenceBot%20–%20&section=new report it to my operator]. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:23, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
 * On the Kait Walsh page, [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=714123610 your edit] caused a URL error (help) . ([ Fix] | [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&preload=User:ReferenceBot/helpform&preloadtitle=Referencing%20errors%20on%20%5B%5BSpecial%3ADiff%2F714123610%7CKait Walsh%5D%5D Ask for help])

References added with ProveIt
Hi sbf, just to let you know it is worth checking a bit more carefully when adding references - the references you added with this diff were for Kate Walsh (actress) not Kait Walsh, so I have removed them. Cheers, Melcous (talk) 02:28, 8 April 2016 (UTC)

Autobiographies
In future, I would advise against congratulating a user for creating an autobiography, since that is something we actively discourage. --Drm310 (talk) 04:35, 8 April 2016 (UTC)

Autobiography
Hi there. I was surprised to find you had tagged Mary Ann Parker as autobiography for the second time. This woman died in 1848! Also, the article has already been rated by 2 Wikiprojects. Please let's not spend any more time on this misunderstanding. Thanks. Lelijg (talk) 17:12, 13 April 2016 (UTC)

Greetings from Zee money
Hello, Sbf1998. This is Zee money. I am autoreviewed. Zee money (talk) 11:18, 14 April 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Cybereport


A tag has been placed on Cybereport requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Erick Shepherd (talk) 14:26, 14 April 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Adspeed
Hello, Sbf1998. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Adspeed, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted, go to my chat or an admin.

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. ThePlatypusofDoom (talk) 16:43, 14 April 2016 (UTC)

Re: WP:AIV
Please only use it for cases of actual vandalism. This is not an acceptable use of WP:AIV Yamamoto Ichiro (talk) 17:27, 14 April 2016 (UTC)

Your creations
You have created thirteen articles, all deleted except the last which doesn't appear notable. Please read WP:GNG and the links at that page. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 00:19, 15 April 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion
I would like you to know that I have changed my PROD tag to a speedy delete. I felt this was the better option, because of its obvious promotional tone. Please refrain from making non-notable articles in the future. If you want to talk, leave a message on my talk page. ThePlatypusofDoom (talk) 18:18, 15 April 2016 (UTC)

Consider reading WP:42. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 22:38, 15 April 2016 (UTC)

Wikipedia:WikiProject United States/The 50,000 Challenge
--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:37, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

RC Patrol-related Proposals in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey
Greetings Recent Changes Patrollers!

This is a one-time-only message to inform you about technical proposals related to Recent Changes Patrol in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey that I think you may be interested in reviewing and perhaps even voting for:


 * 1) Adjust number of entries and days at Last unpatrolled
 * 2) Editor-focused central editing dashboard
 * 3) "Hide trusted users" checkbox option on watchlists and related/recent changes (RC) pages
 * 4) Real-Time Recent Changes App for Android
 * 5) Shortcut for patrollers to last changes list

Further, there are more than 20 proposals related to Watchlists in general that you may be interested in reviewing. (and over 260 proposals in all, across many aspects of wikis)

Thank you for your consideration. Please note that voting for proposals continues through December 12, 2016.

Note: You received this message because you have transcluded User wikipedia/RC Patrol (user box) on your user page. Since this message is "one-time-only" there is no opt out for future mailings.

Best regards, — Delivered: 01:10, 8 December 2016 (UTC)

Your draft article, User:Sbf1998/sandbox


Hello, Sbf1998. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "sandbox".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the  or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Chickadee46  talk  00:14, 11 December 2016 (UTC)

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey
Hello! The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey. We want to know how well we are supporting your work on and off wiki, and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation. You have been randomly selected to take this survey as we would like to hear from your Wikimedia community. To say thank you for your time, we are giving away 20 Wikimedia T-shirts to randomly selected people who take the survey. The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes.

Take the survey now!

You can find more information about this project. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. Please visit our frequently asked questions page to find more information about this survey. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email to surveys@wikimedia.org.

Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 19:20, 13 January 2017 (UTC)

" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Celestina007 (talk) 01:08, 20 May 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Diana Lenska


Hello, Sbf1998. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Diana Lenska".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 03:15, 2 December 2020 (UTC)