User talk:ScriptusSecundus

Welcome
Welcome! Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:
 * The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Editing tutorial
 * Picture tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Naming conventions
 * Manual of Style

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:
 * Respect copyrights - do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
 * Maintain a neutral point of view - this is possibly the most important Wikipedia policy.
 * Take particular care while adding biographical material about a  living person to any Wikipedia page. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced to multiple reliable sources.
 * No Sockpuppetry.
 * If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to [ do so].
 * Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject. Deliberately adding such content or otherwise editing articles maliciously is considered vandalism, doing so will result your account or IP being blocked from editing.

The Wikipedia Tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! Dougweller (talk) 06:47, 19 September 2009 (UTC)

September 2009
Your recent addition has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

You appear to have done this in good faith at this article and Women in Ancient Rome, but I have to ask you to stop. Read the links I've given you above, start making small changes of your own - with references of course. Remember that Wikipedia articles shouldn't be building up arguments but reporting what reliable sources have to say about a subject giving all significant points of view - this is covered at WP:NPOV. Take a look at some of our featured articles to see what they are like. WP:Content is another place to discuss content.

Dougweller (talk) 06:51, 19 September 2009 (UTC)
 * I've just looked at your comments on the talk page of Roman Empire - that's a good way to go about editing when there are other active editors. I suggest you build on that where you will be able to get feedback from other editors interested in the article.


 * You can delete anything you want from this page, you know, so feel free to delete my comments. Dougweller (talk) 06:58, 19 September 2009 (UTC)

I see you intend to replace the material. Please don't do this as we cannot allow copyright material or even close paraphrase -- see WP:CLOSEPARAPHRASE Dougweller (talk) 16:39, 19 September 2009 (UTC)


 * Hi Scriptus. I thought it more appropriate to post here than on the talk pages of the articles you've been editing: those are really intended for discussion of specific improvements to specific articles. Please read Dougweller's welcome message - it's much more than a polite formality - and follow its links - they give the low-down on everything Wikipedian and are essential reading. I've only been editing here about six months myself and still use a "personal" user page as a Sandbox for developing articles, then leave it a while and re-read it for the inevitable flaws. I think quite a few editors do this. Anyway, I've now re-written this message several times because it seemed rather patronising, which was contrary to my intent. You're welcome to contact me on my talk-page should you wish it. Haploidavey (talk) 10:30, 22 September 2009 (UTC)

Spartacus
The issue is with original synthesis. These sources do not specifically address the show as required per WP:V.  Grsz 11  22:02, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Haha, true. I don't know why I did that.  Grsz 11  19:43, 11 April 2010 (UTC)

Please stop edit warring. Multiple users have brought up the issues, and those tags should remain while those issues exist.  Grsz 11  20:44, 29 April 2010 (UTC)

Roman women
Hy there, please answer a couple of points inside of Talk:Women in Ancient Rome asap. Flamarande (talk) 21:31, 16 May 2010 (UTC)


 * Hi, Scriptus (I keep thinking you must be a Scripta). Could you take a look at Women's rights and perhaps add a sentence or two? This section should reflect "Rome" as most people think of it: that is, from the Late Republic and throughout the Empire. Not just the early period. Also, I'm pretty sure I recall women being called as witnesses in trials. Nor do I see how Stoic philosophy could the prime mover in the change from a wife "belonging" to her husband to her remaining part of her own family; this change seems to have occurred before Stoic philosophy permeated the upper classes, and Roman law grew of the mos maiorum, not philosophy per se, particularly at this period. I know you have sources on hand, so I thought you might be able to clarify the section, which need only be a paragraph or two. Cynwolfe (talk) 13:00, 7 February 2011 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:13, 24 November 2015 (UTC)