User talk:Sdfisher

White Spot
'From 1999 onward, White Spot franchises have been installed on 11 ships in the BC Ferries fleet.' I don't know when they startted being featured in Chevron stations. HalfShadow (talk) 05:06, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

Merge list of office suites to office suite
Please comment at Talk:List_of_office_suites --Karnesky (talk) 17:59, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

Balloon Help
Good start to working on the weasel words on this article! thanks. Tiggerjay (talk) 19:05, 28 April 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Appleguidecoachmark.png
Thanks for uploading Image:Appleguidecoachmark.png. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 06:20, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

System 7
I did put a wee bit of thought into it. By all means point people to any pages that with Apple written content. Pointing people to discussions forums with content of dubious quality, where we normally point people to are official web pages, probably isn't a good thing. AlistairMcMillan (talk) 22:05, 3 October 2008 (UTC)

Article about X/Open Transport Interface
Hi, would you like to have a look over this article and review. Thanks Alecssicius (talk) 12:46, 25 July 2009 (UTC) !

Re: ZFS
Actually, I prefer back-and-forth (per the header at the top of my talk) :-). Could you explain why you feel that a blog by a major technology news outlet is unreliable? Most New York Times "blogs" are considered fairly reliable, and I would venture that ZDNet is analogously reliable in the tech news submarket. Would it help if the statement regarding ZFS was specifically attributed in the article text? --Cyber cobra (talk) 21:15, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Yes, that is a far better and more in-depth reference. --Cyber cobra (talk) 22:15, 9 November 2009 (UTC)

You are now a Reviewer
Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 18:33, 19 June 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Mailsmith


The article Mailsmith has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Non-notable software, only reference is a press release by maker (thus not independent).

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. RJFJR (talk) 02:31, 4 September 2011 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:13, 30 November 2015 (UTC)

2016
Still using AIM. --206.188.26.36 (talk) 19:12, 3 November 2016 (UTC)