User talk:Sean2074

Little context in REpower
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on REpower, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because REpower is very short providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting REpower, please affix the template to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that '''this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here''' CSDWarnBot (talk) 14:02, 19 November 2007 (UTC)

REpower
This article still doesn't include an explanation of why this company is notable, or any reliable sources. Without those, it'll be deleted every time. If it really is a notable company, try building the article in your userspace first, or at least not hitting 'save' until the article is ready to add to the encyclopedia. And, hey, how about a little less hate for the people enforcing those rules to keep Wikipedia from becoming nothing but a big collection of spam? We get hundreds, maybe thousands, of people every day adding articles about their non-notable companies to Wiki, which is why the articles that don't have an assertion of notability or reliable sources get deleted immediately. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 13:09, 20 November 2007 (UTC) sorry fisherqueen i kinda snapped when everytime i turned around the page was gone, i would have preferd that the artical had a pending deleation lable on it ~ Sean2074

REpower
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article REpower, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add db-author to the top of the page. UtherSRG (talk) 13:59, 20 November 2007 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of SPLAT!


The article SPLAT! has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Lacks independent reliable sources, thus fails the general notability guidelines

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.  Chzz  ►  13:36, 15 September 2009 (UTC)

 Chzz  ►  15:52, 16 September 2009 (UTC)