User talk:Seb az86556/archive33

March 2012[edit]

To enforce an arbitration decision, you have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for violation of the 1RR restriction and battleground conduct on the page Palestinian people. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, please read the guide to appealing arbitration enforcement blocks and follow the instructions there to appeal your block. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 20:42, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Notice to administrators: In a March 2010 decision, the Committee held that "Administrators are prohibited from reversing or overturning (explicitly or in substance) any action taken by another administrator pursuant to the terms of an active arbitration remedy, and explicitly noted as being taken to enforce said remedy, except: (a) with the written authorization of the Committee, or (b) following a clear, substantial, and active consensus of uninvolved editors at a community discussion noticeboard (such as WP:AN or WP:ANI). If consensus in such discussions is hard to judge or unclear, the parties should submit a request for clarification on the proper page. Any administrator that overturns an enforcement action outside of these circumstances shall be subject to appropriate sanctions, up to and including desysopping, at the discretion of the Committee."

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Seb az86556 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Honest mistake, I did not know that. Well, that is, I probably misconstrued the note on top of the page. What I understood was that this applies to the Israeli-Arab question of the article. In any case, whether or not this request is granted, I will never edit that article again. It's not that important to me anyways. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 ^{> haneʼ} 21:11, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Accept reason:

Fair enough, I'll take word for it. But please remember that the 1RR applies to all parts of all articles within the scope of the case, and please limit your edit summaries to summarising your edits, rather than making passive aggressive comments in them. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 21:22, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

thank you. Lesson learned. I've already taken the article off my watchlist; let them fight. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 ^{> haneʼ} 21:25, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 21:32, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

please[edit]

Please don't collapse those comments in the Obama article like was done recently. Thank you. Afghandeaths (talk) 23:19, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

And how long ago was that? I collapse whatever violates WP:FORUM. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 ^{> haneʼ} 23:33, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Why can't I talk about it on the talk page?[edit]

I don't get why I can't discuss Sandra Fluke on the talk page.Why is that disruptive? Casprings (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 04:14, 10 March 2012 (UTC).[reply]

Because you are not supposed to discuss Sandra Fluke anywhere on wikipedia. You are solely to discuss how to improve the article (which doesn't exist), based on specific suggestions (which you didn't make), using specific sources (which you didn't bring). Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 ^{> haneʼ} 04:24, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback[edit]

Hello, Seb az86556. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Midemer.
Message added 20:21, 10 March 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

There is a comment left, but no response. We'll have to close it if nothing else comes in. -- DQ (ʞlɐʇ) 20:21, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Such matters are for administrators and clerks to handle. I simply filed a case, you handle it. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 ^{> haneʼ} 02:24, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Nv zoo logo small.png[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Nv zoo logo small.png. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 16:06, 23 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]