User talk:Seba5tien/Archive 1

Welcome
 Hello, Seba5tien, and Welcome to Wikipedia!  Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page – I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.

--- Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:


 * Table of contents / Department directory


 * The Wikipedia Adventure (a tutorial orienting you with Wikipedia)

Need help?


 * Questions – a guide on where to ask questions
 * Cheatsheet – quick reference on Wikipedia's mark-up codes
 * Wikipedia's 5 pillars – an overview of Wikipedia's foundations


 * Article wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
 * The simplified ruleset – a summary of Wikipedia's most important rules
 * Guide to Wikipedia – a thorough step-by-step guide to Wikipedia

How you can help:


 * Contributing to Wikipedia – a guide on how you can help


 * Community portal – Wikipedia's hub of activity

Additional tips...


 * Please sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes ( ~ ). This will automatically insert your "signature" (your username and a date stamp). The [[File:Button sig.png]] or [[File:Insert-signature.png]] button, on the tool bar above Wikipedia's text editing window, also does this.
 * If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills without changing the mainspace, the Sandbox is for you.

Seba5tien, good luck, and have fun. – —&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·C) 21:46, 23 July 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Fountain pen
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Fountain pen you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of David Eppstein -- David Eppstein (talk) 22:20, 25 July 2016 (UTC)

Fountain pen
The dead links should stay. Tag them with or  see wp:KDL (keep dead links). Thank you Jim1138 (talk) 05:28, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Hi Jim, thank you for your message. Acknowledged and understood, I'll review WP:KDL and make sure not to remove any dead links. Seba5tien (talk/contribs) 05:34, 26 July 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 26
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Stellarium (computer program), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Shooting star. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:33, 26 July 2016 (UTC)



✅ Rectified link with appropriate astronomical context. Thanks! Seba5tien (talk/contribs) 10:38, 26 July 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Fountain pen
The article Fountain pen you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Fountain pen for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of David Eppstein -- David Eppstein (talk) 00:21, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Seba5tien, please ignore this message; your GA review is still ongoing. Unfortunately, when you submitted an FAC for this article—you should never have a GAN and an FAC submitted at the same time—and the FAC was closed, the bot erroneously closed both the FAC and the GAN, something it isn't supposed to do. Please be sure to address the issues that David Eppstein has raised in his review at Talk:Fountain pen/GA1. Thanks! BlueMoonset (talk) 02:45, 27 July 2016 (UTC)


 * Hi BlueMoonset, thank you for your message. Apologies for any inconvenience caused because of my mistake. I am now working to address the referencing and notability concerns identified by David in the Talk:Fountain pen/GA1 nomination. Thanks! Seba5tien (talk/contribs) 06:01, 27 July 2016 (UTC)

Dell International Services
I have cancelled your proposed deletion. WP:PROD is for uncontroversial deletions. You appear to be proposing a WP:MERGE or WP:REDIRECT to Dell. Either can be done WP:BOLDLY. ~Kvng (talk) 14:34, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
 * ✅ <b style="color:purple;">Seba5tien</b> (talk/contribs) 08:50, 28 July 2016 (UTC)

Sockpuppet investigations/JohnAdamsSapphireOne
I spotted your comment over at the sock investigation page. Since you are new to the site I thought I might offer some advice about how to approach situations such as the one you described, where an editor challenges a tag on article. When an article is tagged by any editor its usually because the editor in question believes that the material shouldn't be on site, so when you tag an article for CSD stand by your decision. I situations like this there is a "two man rule" concept in play, as administrators have to review the article(s) tagged anyway, so a neutral party will have to look over the article in question before deleting it. In this way then the onus is on an editor to prove to two different people with Wikipedia accounts why the article in question should not be deleted, and allows for an editor who placed the CSD tag to get an outside opinion on the article they think is questionable. Also, as unfortunate as it is to say, we have saying at the admin level, something to the effect of 'if you are not being called a Nazi (or being insulted by editors or putting up with other editorial bs by people who feel somehow wronged over your actions) then you are not doing your job correctly', so the louder the voice(s) complaining about your actions in CSD matters the greater the chances are that whatever you are doing you are in fact doing right.

Off the subject, as a new editor, I wanted to congratulate you for having a keen enough eye to have spotted and tagged the article for deletion. There are not too many new editors out there with natural skills like yours, so don't let this discourage you. Have the makings of a future administrator, should you decide to take up that mantle. TomStar81 (Talk) 07:40, 29 July 2016 (UTC)


 * Hi TomStar81, thank you for your advice and kind words of encouragement. I completely understand, and will definitely think of these points as I keep working at New Page Review and CSD. In terms of future plans, I have also applied at the CVUA and hope to continue supporting the community as a long-term member. <b style="color:purple;">Seba5tien</b> (talk/contribs) 07:52, 29 July 2016 (UTC)

AC9900
Seba5tien what changes to I need to make to my page: Renault e.Dams? AC9900 (talk) 12:44, 30 July 2016 (UTC)

Replied on this editor's talk page.

Merger discussion for Majority Strategies
An article that you have been involved in editing&mdash;Majority Strategies&mdash;has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. Adam9007 (talk) 21:50, 30 July 2016 (UTC)

Mistakenly Removed Edit
Hi, Seba5tien. I noticed that you removed an edit I had made on the Language page because you thought that it had been a practice edit. It was in fact a proper edit which I made to make the amount of elaboration between captions consistent throughout the article. I have since recorrected the article with the appropriate information. Backthrow (talk) 00:59, 31 July 2016 (UTC)

Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare Remasterd A10 tag
Thank you for your valuable work in NPP, but I've declined the A10 tag you've placed on that article. Please be aware of the note at WP:CSD: )This deletion rationale should only be used rarely. In the vast majority of duplicate articles, the title used is a plausible misspelling or alternate name for the main article, and a redirect should be created instead. If you need any help don't hesitate to ask me on my talk page. Keep up the excellent anti-vandalism work! → Σ σ  ς . (Sigma) 05:28, 2 August 2016 (UTC)

Message from User: Jaguar.D.Sam
Hi Seba5tien, in One Piece article you named the 35th daughter of Big Mom Charlotte Purin. I think that her name is Pudding, not Purin. That's how Eiichiro Oda named her. Jaguar.D.Sam (talk) 10:41, 10 August 2016 (UTC)

WikiProject Computer Security user status
Hello Renamed user HrWYwjQnRA,

I would just like to inquire on your status on WikiProject Computer Security as the list of WikiProject Computer Security/Members is going to be improved to list active and inactive users.

This is update is being done according to a request for comments on the WikiProject Computer Security talk page. Be sure to state your status at the User status section in the WikiProject Computer Security talk page before the end of four weeks as this will state your status as inactive in the project if not done before then.

FockeWulf FW 190 (talk) 23:17, 16 August 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of List of mergers and acquisitions by Amazon for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of mergers and acquisitions by Amazon is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of mergers and acquisitions by Amazon until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. --Jax 0677 (talk) 18:43, 1 September 2016 (UTC)

Guild of Copy Editors September 2016 News
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:36, 9 September 2016 (UTC)

Welcome
Welcome back! Dat GuyTalkContribs 17:48, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

Guild of Copy Editors December 2016 News
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:30, 8 December 2016 (UTC)

Guild of Copy Editors February 2017 News
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:20, 20 February 2017 (UTC)

We're on Twitter!
RachelWex 19:34, 10 June 2017 (UTC)

Guild of Copy Editors December 2017 News
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:04, 23 December 2017 (UTC)

GOCE February 2018 news
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:00, 25 February 2018 (UTC)

June 2018 GOCE newsletter
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:26, 5 June 2018 (UTC)

August GOCE newsletter
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:25, 15 August 2018 (UTC)

December 2018 GOCE newsletter
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:05, 3 December 2018 (UTC)

GOCE 2018 Annual Report
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:31, 31 January 2019 (UTC)

March GOCE newsletter
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:12, 19 March 2019 (UTC)

GOCE June newsletter
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:29, 12 June 2019 (UTC)

September 2019 GOCE Newsletter
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:58, 24 September 2019 (UTC)

GOCE December 2019 Newsletter
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:05, 4 December 2019 (UTC)

GOCE March newsletter
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:52, 18 March 2020 (UTC)