User talk:Second Skin

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:43, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 15
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Balenciaga, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fashion line.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 15 May 2024 (UTC)

ANI discussion
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. —DIYeditor (talk) 01:28, 23 May 2024 (UTC)

Final warning regarding topic ban violation
Second Skin, last October you were topic banned from all pages and discussions relating to music genres per this discussion, a discussion in which you participated. You were informed of the enactment of the topic ban here on your talk page. The topic ban was logged at Editing_restrictions. There is no possible way that it can be construed that you were unaware of this topic ban.

Your recent edits to Witch house (genre) constitute a clear, unequivocal violation of this topic ban. There are a number of people at the current ongoing WP:AN/I discussion who concur this was a clear violation.

This is a final warning. If you violate your topic ban again, you will be blocked, whether by me or another uninvolved administrator. It is highly likely there will be no further discussion and no further warnings to halt your violations. Either you abide by your topic ban, or you will be blocked.

If you have any questions about this, or are in any way unclear about your topic ban, then ASK before conducting any further edits that might, broadly construed, constitute a violation of your topic ban. If you persist as you have been without amending your behavior, you will be blocked. I hope I've been clear. If not, then by all means ask. You've been here 10+ years and made over 11k edits. Don't screw it up now. Thank you, --Hammersoft (talk) 15:59, 23 May 2024 (UTC)

May 2024
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for topic ban violations. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. —Ingenuity (t • c) 17:15, 28 May 2024 (UTC)

Suggestion/Comment
The reason for your block is because seven members of the community supported the proposal for a temporary indef, as seen in the discussion. So the only way to get unblocked, I believe, is to follow Cullen328 and Ad Orientem's advice - Recommendation: Admit your violation and promise to never repeat it. Keep your promise. and Acknowledge your mistakes, and please give us unequivocal assurances that you will respect the topic ban and be civil in your interactions with other editors going forward.

If I could opine further, I wouldn't focus on making excuses for the violation of the topic ban, but rather, focus on admitting it was a violation and explain in a convincing manner how you will not do it again. Hope this helps. Isaidnoway (talk) 17:39, 30 May 2024 (UTC)