User talk:SecretSquirrel78

Reverting your update of the WP logo
Please do note that even after the removal of gradients and shadows from the official logo, the hammer is still deemed to be over the threshold of originality by Commons volunteers and it's not my decision. I have reverted your revert until you can come to a I did not nominate your upload, and you will have to discuss it with them, not me. Until then, the simplified logo should remain to prevent the bot from alerting the Talkpage across many articles that the WP logo is going to be deleted.

As for the PAP logo, it was deemed to be under the threshold of originality, being composed of a simple roundel and lightning, and therefore deemed ineligible for copyright, unlike the hammer. If you can come up with a simplified hammer which closely resembles the original without being deemed a derivative work, please do upload one. Seloloving (talk) 17:47, 8 September 2020 (UTC)

Adding note:

I have further requested assistance for all the party logos at this link. Please do justify your criteria for the WP logo that it's under the TOO as I have done on the deletion page: that the simplified hammer conists of only simple geometric elements. Thank you. Seloloving (talk) 21:33, 8 September 2020 (UTC)

Peace truce here
Hello here, my name is Nelson. I just want to have a talk here. I apologize for any inconvenience caused, but the fact that you directly cited my name on the top of an article and asked for restraints to be put on me which kind of made me feel greatly affected. I have taken down the death row condition edits just to say. NelsonLee20042020 (talk) 04:11, 9 July 2022 (UTC)


 * also, i will edit away any unneeded info from the article. I have no hard feelings here, thank you for the cleanup reminder. NelsonLee20042020 (talk) 04:17, 9 July 2022 (UTC)
 * besides, some of my edits were updates to the list of notable cases of people receiving the death penalty and the changes to the law, which were not covered in detail before I first entered the wiki editor world just two years before. NelsonLee20042020 (talk) 04:26, 9 July 2022 (UTC)

I also want to clarify here. I am not a anti death penalty activist. I am in normal life a young ordinary fella who likes anything korean and reading about many types of things, including crime. I am most interested in reading about capital cases and especially murder. I absolutely support the death penalty with all of my heart. Also, I create articles not for an agenda but to explore my interest and to spread more awareness of some other noteworthy cases that deserve to have their stories written on Wikipedia. NelsonLee20042020 (talk) 05:16, 9 July 2022 (UTC)

Besides, I would want every murderer (excluding the ones who killed in a fight, provocation or under mental illness infuence) to be executed for their terrible crimes on the victims and families. I unconditionally despise them to be honest. NelsonLee20042020 (talk) 05:19, 9 July 2022 (UTC)

I do not wish to have a vendetta against anyone here, and I hope you do not misunderstand me. I am here to tell you my thoughts and clarify the misunderstanding you harboured about me. NelsonLee20042020 (talk) 05:57, 9 July 2022 (UTC)

I also would like to request to you to maybe amend the comments you made in the discussions about Kalwant and Norasharee NelsonLee20042020 (talk) 06:01, 9 July 2022 (UTC)

SecretSquirrel78, I removed your baseless personal attack from one of the two AfDs. Rest assured that the closing administrator will know how to value your personal attack in that deletion discussion. Please consider this note also a warning. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 00:59, 10 July 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion contested: Nazeri Lajim
Hello SecretSquirrel78. I am just letting you know that I contested the speedy deletion of Nazeri Lajim, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: The article makes a credible assertion of importance or significance, sufficient to pass A7. Thank you. BangJan1999 16:55, 5 August 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:32, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

June 2024
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Singapore. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.  Eve rgr een Fir  (talk) 16:24, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.