User talk:Seelefant

Disambiguation link notification for October 16
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Age of Sail, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cyclopaedia (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:46, 16 October 2013 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:57, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Re your Action Park edit
That was from the source, the accounts of lifeguards at the park, who may have been looking for explanations other than the poor swimming ability of the patrons or the way the attraction was run as an explanation for the many emergencies and near-emergencies that occurred. Obviously they weren't experts in this subject. Daniel Case (talk) 20:56, 14 December 2017 (UTC)

Jarrod Bleijie
As I previously pointed out, the words you used in your previous edit summary (now supressed) strongly suggest you have a Point of View about Jarrod Bleijie and that appears to impact on your ability to craft an accurate NPOV statement about him in those circumstances. Saying "publicly attacked" is both emotive and vague. What did he attack her with? A baseball bat? How public was the attack? In the town square? How badly was she injured? Concussion and broken bones? No, none of those things. He wrote a tweet. Why not just say what it was and skip the hyperbole? And why put it in the Attorney-General section? Did he tweet in his role of Attorney-General (perhaps through some use of time travel)?. Calm down, think of what should be said according to our policies and say it in a properly crafted edit with a properly formatted citation in the right place of the article and punctuate it correctly please, instead of just reinstating your problematic edit. FWIW, I don't agree with what JB said either. Kerry (talk) 09:00, 16 September 2018 (UTC)


 * My point of view does not matter. My edit comment might have been inappropriate, the content is not. Your tangent about bodily injury is ... irrelevant. If you see that as a problem, why did you remove my sourced comment instead of inserting the word 'verbally'? This is about deeply uncivil and disturbing behavior of a politician. The information is sourced and, all in all, not worded inappropriately. I am starting to get the impression that I might not be the only one with a "point of view" here, and that some people might be interested in whitewashing this.... person's page. -- Seelefant (talk) 06:30, 17 September 2018 (UTC)

Re:message from a pedant
K – BriefEdits (talk) 00:32, 10 January 2020 (UTC)

Important Notice
Doug Weller talk 09:45, 8 April 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:45, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:34, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 5
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Linas Antanas Linkevičius, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Belarusian. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 5 January 2024 (UTC)