User talk:Seraphimblade

Please read before posting

 * Post all new sections under a new header at the bottom of this page, not at random. If you make it clear you ignored these instructions by placing it elsewhere, I am likely to ignore your request in turn.


 * If you leave me a message here, I will respond to it here, as fragmented discussions are confusing. I may or may not leave you a notice that I've responded on your talk page. If you specifically request that I do (or do not) give you such a notice when I respond, I'll honor that request. If I contact you on your talk page, I will watchlist it so that I can respond there. If you'd like to leave me a notice when you respond (a ping will also suffice), it would be appreciated, and you'll probably receive a faster followup.
 * No lulztxtspk or emojis on my talk page, please. "You" is spelled "you", "though" is spelled "though", "because" is spelled "because", "people" is spelled "people", and so on. There is no character limit on Wikipedia comments, so there is no need whatsoever for ad-hoc abbreviating. If you don't even take yourself seriously, don't expect me to take you seriously either.
 * If you are an admin here to ask me about someone I blocked for vandalism or spamming/advertising, they've agreed to stop it, and you believe they intend to edit productively, go ahead and unblock them. If you still want my opinion please feel free to ask, but there's no obligation. For more complex cases I would appreciate a heads-up, but please go ahead with your best judgment if I don't seem to be online. I would appreciate it if you'd let me know after you do.
 * If you are here to discuss edits made to an article, please use the article talk page, not this talk page, to discuss them. If I made the edit and the question is specifically directed at me, you are welcome to ping me.
 * If you email me a question or request, and do not indicate why the matter is sensitive and must be handled privately (and such is not immediately obvious), I may ignore it or respond on your talk page rather than by return email. Talk pages are open to other editors to read, and so are the preferred method of communication for matters involving Wikipedia. If the matter you are speaking to me about is Wikipedia-related and would not violate anyone's privacy by being posted publicly, please use my talk page instead of email. This does not, of course, apply to editors who are blocked from editing, though I still may respond on your talk page rather than by return email.

Security Assurance by the Building Research Establishment
I didn't create Security Assurance by the Building Research Establishment, but I don't think it was unduly promotional. Perhaps draftifying it would have been better. LeapTorchGear (talk) 16:47, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
 * , there was nothing salvageable in there to draft, as, yes, it was promotional. I'll give you the sources used in it if you want to take a go at creating a neutral article, but if

you consider an article based almost entirely on primary sources and press releases which talks up how great something is to not be promotional, you might consider getting some more experience before you have a go at that. Seraphimblade Talk to me 17:11, 8 July 2024 (UTC)

A goat for you!
All your friends will want one now.

20:11, 8 July 2024 (UTC) 
 * Thanks, I think? Never played Goat Simulator myself, but I know some people who have really gotten a kick out of it. Seraphimblade Talk to me 20:24, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
 * ba dum tsh.  23:37, 8 July 2024 (UTC)

Notice of noticeboard discussion
There is currently a discussion at Administrative action review regarding an action which you performed. The thread is Unilateral overturning of a close by Seraphimblade. Thank you. –&#8239;Joe (talk) 13:07, 9 July 2024 (UTC)

Amaravati
I have replied to you about Amaravati unblock request, without even checking my reply messages and clarfying your doubts with me, and without even updating me back, you just blocked me. This is very unfortunate, when I am clearly being polite with you. Ustadeditor2011 (talk) 16:00, 9 July 2024 (UTC)

Books & Bytes – Issue 63
The Wikipedia Library: Books & Bytes

Issue 63, May – June 2024  Read the full newsletter Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --12:16, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
 * One new partner
 * 1Lib1Ref
 * Spotlight: References check

AE Sorabino
G'day Seraphimblade, we have problem with page Duchy of Saint Sava, which was a subject of AE on Sorabino, last week I believe. Now, both Sorabino and Levivich changing content without mandatory consensuses as per AE conclusion. ౪ Santa ౪ 99°  17:11, 18 July 2024 (UTC)


 * Prior to taking any of the actions of moving, merging and redirecting, or blanking and redirecting the article, consensus must be established for such an action. $(emphasis added)$ ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 17:36, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Ok, I understand, we have whole host of problematic content disputes anyway. ౪ Santa ౪  99°  17:38, 18 July 2024 (UTC)