User talk:ShadowX81

Welcome![edit]

Hello, ShadowX81! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Wakanda's Black Panther!♠/♦ 03:41, 19 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
A tutorial • Our five pillars • Getting mentored How to: edit a page • upload and use images
Getting help
Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention
Policies and guidelines
Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The community
Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community Portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Writing articles
Be bold in editing • Develop an article The perfect article • Manual of style Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation Pages needing attention • Peer review
Miscellaneous
User name • User pages • Talk pages Clean up: General - Spam - Vandalism Join a WikiProject • Translation Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

But please, don't get involved in edit-warring. If you are right in your edits, then surely you can find other editors who agree with you that will revert it for you. And, no, I don't mean WP:SOCKPUPPETS ~ Wakanda's Black Panther!♠/♦ 03:41, 19 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

ShadowX81 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Um. I got blocked for abusing multiple accounts. First of all, ive never had an account before this one. Second of all, I didnt abuse this one. Il admit I am in process of resolving an edit dispiute with another member, but we are calmly working that out.

Decline reason:

ahem... This clearly shows you're abusing multiple accounts to evade a block. If you want to get unblocked, your first objective should be to realize you're in a hole and stop digging. — Pascal.Tesson (talk) 04:08, 19 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Based on edits here and here, you appear to be the same as User:Bcute12. --Kinu ^t/_c 04:10, 19 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

ShadowX81 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Im sorry, but what about that proves ( ore even suggests) I have multiple accounts? I looked to see if other people agreed with me, found that they did, and eidted a comment that I already made to reflect that.

Decline reason:

We like to call it the duck test. Now if you still claim that you have nothing to do with Bcute12 (talk · contribs), we can always check that through a request for checkuser but like I said, stop digging. — Pascal.Tesson (talk) 04:19, 19 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

ShadowX81 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Ok, can you do a check user thing. I hardly think that im an "a hole" for not wanting to be blocked. I also think I have every right to know why I have been unfairly banned ( or digging, as youv put it.) There is no reason to be rude.

Decline reason:

There is no point in wasting the checkuser's time. Such a request would be declined as unnecessary. Your account was created today, in the midst of an edit war, which you leapt immediately into. Your very first edit makes it clear you are not a new user, but rather someone else who is abusing accounts to avoid a block. I am now protecting this talk page to prevent further disruption. If you feel you have some ground-breaking proof to show you are not who you obviously appear to be, you may send it to the unblock email list as directed in your block message. — Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 04:37, 19 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Email reply[edit]

Even if you aren't abusing multiple accounts, you are clearly here for the single purpose of disruption, that of edit warring. I am going to attempt to have a checkuser look into this, however if they decline there is really nothing I can do about it. Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 05:12, 19 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, it seems I owe you an apology. Not only were you not the same person as Bcute12, you two appear to be in different countries. As such, I have lifted the indefinite block placed on your account, as well as the protection on this talk page. However, you remain blocked for another 24 hours for creating this account to get around your IP block from the edit war. Edit warring is disruptive, and discussion needs to come to a consensus before any further edits are made in controversial situations. When your block is released, please take more care to finish your discussions before proceeding to undo other's edits. Sorry for the misunderstanding, however in the future, please leave the warring off the project. Thank you. Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 05:31, 19 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Its cool. I can understnad where the misunderstanding came about. Im just glad this was whole thing resolved.

(ShadowX81 (talk) 05:33, 19 May 2008 (UTC))[reply]