User talk:Shirik/Archives/2011/October

Hounding
This guy was repeatedly invited to disengage from me, because he was once warned to do not cross the boundaries of hounding me. After my topic ban was expanded, due a baseless ANI triggered by him, I do not find any encyclopedic reason or purpose for him still leaving me comments inviting me to "self-criticism" "leaving out my cave", and referring to me as "making a joke of [my]self", etc. Comments that I have explicity rejected but are reposted and reposted here and there. I certainly enjoy sending that sort of comments to the trash can, but I do not want any other pretext to be used to apply even more sanctions against me. --  ClaudioSantos ¿?  17:01, 15 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Another chapter in the long discussion. ClaudioSantos refuses to cooperate with other people, and has by now a few people on his shitlist. He refuses to talk with them. I am one of them. It is not for nothing that he has now his second topic ban, about the widest ever given... Night of the Big Wind  talk  19:21, 15 October 2011 (UTC)
 * I am not editing any wikipedia-article where NotBW is involved, not even editing any article at wikipedia. What sort of cooperation is he demanding? To response his futil request to endorse "criticism"? Does he want a kind of written speech from me declaring shame about my doings? I was talking with other people at my talk page where NotBW burst to provokate such sort of useless suggestions. NotBW already crossed the lines of hounding, although he was warned to stop doing so. I am not obligated to talk with NotBW nor to response his provokations even if I enjoy it. What sort of cooperation does NotBw want when he request from me to "Come on, Claudio! You are now making a joke of yourself. Why don't you just accept that life is nasty and that you sometimes loose battles?" ? What does sort of cooperation does NotBW want when he request from me "you should face the world, dear Claudio. Come out of your cave and start living and interacting with people!"? Is there any encyclopedic purpose on that or they are solely provokations? Once I  have explicity rejected his comments and once NotBW explicity recognized that his comments and discussions are not welcomed, then why to insist in reposting them again and again at my user-talk page and then again at other users-talk pages? Is there any encyclopedic purpose on insisting in that sort of useless discussionst or it is solely provokation and disruption? what sort of cooperation is NotBW demanding when he claims ""You are such a pity boy, Claudio. You can not win from me, so now you start crying"? Is this a request of a defeatist speech to satisfy any ego? Does it has any encyclopedic purpose or it is solely provokation, disruption and hounding?  --  ClaudioSantos  ¿?  20:05, 15 October 2011 (UTC)
 * If I was banned because of "combativeness" then why NotBW evidently warrior behavior is being allowed at all? --  ClaudioSantos ¿?  20:31, 15 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Yep, "combativeness". Because you answer every request or remark with an attack. Night of the Big Wind  talk  22:13, 15 October 2011 (UTC)

FYI: Hounding? Night of the Big Wind  talk  22:24, 15 October 2011 (UTC)

GOCE drive newsletter
Sent on behalf of the Guild of Copy Editors using AWB on 02:10, 29 October 2011 (UTC)