User talk:SkarmCA

Delta Muscae stuff
Hey, Skarm.

I'm not actually reviewing the article, but I took a look at it and made a few grammatical corrections. I honestly think a Nomenclature section can be added to the article; you could talk about all the different designations Delta Muscae has, and the Bayer designation itself. I managed to scrounge one up on one of the star articles I've been working on.

You created this article from stratch and now it's a good article nominee; I really do respect that. I bid you good luck with the review. --Starstriker7(Dime algoor see my works) 05:41, 18 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Hah, no problem. With a few last tweaks, Del Mus is probably going to pass GA. There aren't really any good star articles one can use as efficient templates (Sirius is outrageously well-observed and thus has a bit too much info for these purposes, and Barnard's Star is just plain "special"), and the passage of this article might also inspire others to improve star articles (which is really good news). --Starstriker7(Dime algoor see my works) 22:13, 18 December 2008 (UTC)


 * If it is of any help, I just thought I'd mention that we have a few other star articles at FA: Cygnus X-1, IK Pegasi and Tau Ceti. Good luck with your work.&mdash;RJH (talk) 16:02, 22 December 2008 (UTC)

Solar System
Thank you for your intention to work on Solar System related articles. Well, you do not actually need my permission because I do not owe these articles. This a basic principle of Wikipedia that the articles can be edited by anybody. However I would appreciate your help in copy-editing Moons of Uranus article. I have expanded it and added references, but it needs a pair of fresh eyes. If you do not understand something, please, ask me. I am also going to start work on Oberon article soon, and I would appreciate your help with it too. Ruslik (talk) 09:22, 18 December 2008 (UTC)

Galaxy in star infobox
Hiya,

I found your discussion with another user on the Sirius talk page relating to which galaxy stars are located in. I agree with you this would be entirely redundant, perhaps we could update the infobox to have a spot for which arm the star is in. These could just link to the Milky Way page thus eliminating any confusion. Is this plausible and better than writing in who knows how many star articles (and thousands more to come) that they're in Milky Way? Heck, in addition we could update the galaxy infobox template to include supercluster. Perhaps this would give astronomical objects more of a felt "location" rather than just listing the coordinates, which would be hard for the average reader to understand. Let me know what you think! SkarmCA (talk) 17:06, 21 December 2008 (UTC)


 * That's not a bad idea, assuming you can actually find a suitable reference that will provide the information. Thanks.&mdash;RJH (talk) 15:54, 22 December 2008 (UTC)

Moons of Uranus
I nominated this list to WP:FLC. Ruslik (talk) 18:23, 3 January 2009 (UTC)

Epsilon Aurigae
Hah, thanks.

This is a really interesting variable star system. I think it could use a few images, so I'll find the time to hunt around for them. I'll be pretty loaded up with work in the near future, but I'll try to fulfill your cross-check. --Starstriker7(Talk) 23:54, 8 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Hey man, sorry to bother you. If you have the time, can we wrap up this review? --Starstriker7(Talk) 16:12, 15 February 2009 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Delta Muscae
The article Delta Muscae you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. It hasn't failed because it's basically a good article, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within seven days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See Talk:Delta Muscae for things needed to be addressed. Wronkiew (talk) 18:16, 14 January 2009 (UTC)

Talk:Epsilon Aurigae/GA1
Hey, any plans to finish up this review? Looks like the nominator fixed your concerns a while back. Wizardman 16:41, 9 March 2009 (UTC)

Flag icon usage
Hi SkarmCA, I noticed you have been going through shuttle and expedition articles, adding flag icons to members from other countries. I thought you may wish to know that this has been discussed previously with regards to the manual of style for mission articles, and per the Manual of Style, ("Flags are visually striking, and placing a national flag next to something can make its nationality or location seem to be of greater significance than other things.") the general decision a few years ago was that for ESA astronauts, the country should be given after the agency (i.e. Léopold Eyharts (2) Flight Engineer 2 - ESA (France)), but that flag icons are visually distracting, and place undue weight on nationality, because an astronaut's nationality does not affect his duties during the mission, or the mission itself, which is why there were no flags in the articles. Flag icons are mostly used in tables, especially for sporting events, where nationality is of high importance to the reader's understanding of the article/table. Cheers, Ariel  ♥  Gold  15:58, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
 * There were a number of discussions on a whole bunch of different article and project pages, but if I recall correctly, I think the consensus was that since Expedition/Soyuz crews were often a mix of agencies/nationalities, the flags would be used once on the first mention, along with agency name, and for any subsequent mention, only agency would be used. (For example, when it lists the same person twice, for the multi-part expeditions, only one flag would be used on first mention.) For the shuttle missions, the flag use was just so visually distracting, and since all NASA astronauts are American, and JAXA astronauts are Japanese, etc., it was decided not to use the distraction of the flags. Also, those articles are longer, more prose, and the icons are generally reserved for tables, so they were unnecessary in the shuttle articles. Cheers :) Ariel  ♥  Gold  16:15, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Awesome, thanks! And hey, I just peeked at Moons of Uranus, great job on that FA! Ariel  ♥  Gold  16:33, 23 March 2009 (UTC)

Royal Stars
Hi, Any update on the Royal Stars and them being noted so far back as 3000BC? You mentioned you were doing some research about Regulus and were going to "try and scrounge up" additional info... Thanks in advance, CielProfond (talk) 03:17, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 01:06, 21 June 2012 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from, SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 17:10, 23 April 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Keith Edward Abbott


The article Keith Edward Abbott has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Alans1977 (talk) 18:25, 28 June 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:57, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Henry Alexius Abbott


The article Henry Alexius Abbott has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "NN merchant, fails the GNG and WP:NOTINHERITED. Could find no substantive coverage in reliable sources (the one reference listed, in fact, turning up a cropper). That he had children who might meet the GNG is neither here nor there.  Notability tagged for over a decade."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.   Ravenswing     09:34, 20 July 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:44, 29 November 2022 (UTC)