User talk:Skier Dude/archive/archive Apr 07

Cast tables
Hi Skier, about undoing cast tables, I often feel tempted to undo some, but there are MANY such tables. My suggestion is that we take a clear decision in WP Films talk, on which we could base a more general cleanup of such tables when we find any. The problem is that the very film suggested as an infobox example in the WP Films Style guidelines, i.e. The Terminator, has such a table. It may be that it's not as easy as just stating style guidelines for removing them. Hoverfish Talk 07:56, 2 April 2007 (UTC)

I'd be glad to support it when you raise the issue. Good going, by the way! Hoverfish Talk 15:35, 2 April 2007 (UTC)


 * I agree we need consistency between the film articles so for the new articles I am producing now I will start to list the cast as a simple list rather than as a table. I do think it might be worth starting a discussion at some point about these at WP film talk but for now I am more interested in just getting wider film coverage and it is maybe something we can all discuss in the future --Amxitsa 09:34, 7 April 2007 (UTC)

use of the film template
Hi, I noticed you've gone through some of the pages I've been tagging and was just checking to see if I'm doing the right thing and not wasting everyone's time!! I'm just going through all (or at least most!) to check for infoboxes and images (or lack thereof) and am not sure of the procedure with some films, I expect they all should have infoboxes and posters/screnshots etc. I'm alos not sure if I should be tagging tamil or indian films under wikiproject film or india cinema. Please let me know if I'm stuffing up a process in place or making it harder for people? Peter 01:04, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the notes. That's essentially what I'm doing, just defining class, needs infobox, and filmimage I guess I should do the other tags while I'm at it! The reason I'm going through is because I was just checking by year and noticed a few missing, and I wanted to start updating infoboxes/adding them but noticed some still weren't tagged, and some aren't tagged with film in general. Then it got the better of me and I feel like I have to finish this process to get a better idea of how many need infoboxes. It's a little deceiving when it looks like there's 1,000 left to do but there's actually now about 3,000 plus I would expect how it's going, another 2,000 or so (that's about a quarter of all film articles). This then gives a far more accurate view of how many are outstanding (but as you pointed out, this process has already been done by country, which means a sub project would them be to match year/country categories). Once years are done, I guess there's still all the other categories too (and the new ones being added). The main thing was to know if I was doing it right, not stuffing something up or tagging the wrong articles (such as novels etc). Thanks again. I really shouldn't be doing this though, I have too much other work to do, very distracting... :) Peter 01:29, 7 April 2007 (UTC)


 * I was wondering whether cartoons, and anime are considered part of the wikifilm project, or are they under a different category? I feel they are but have left some as I'm unsure, they already appear to have an established infobox and wikiproject. Peter 01:37, 7 April 2007 (UTC)

ROMANESQUE
Yeah, I'm expecting a long series of reverts until eventually someone cracks. It's already started, I'll be posting messages on the talk pages. WLU 19:38, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

Stub
I'm afraid that the stub does not seem to register. Sorry--Anthony.bradbury 22:29, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

Welsh films
THanks skier wow you get around. thanks for info boxing that welsh film - I think we have just come across the film director Helen herself - she has won BAFTA awards for her welsh films and is putting the films on wikipedia -if it is her she only lives about 10 miles away in Cardiff!! ♦ Sir Blofeld ♦ "Expecting you" Contribs 01:25, 9 April 2007 (UTC)


 * http://www.imdb.com/name/nm1635707/ This is who it is.

Yeah P.J. Sparkles ^^
Yeah, I was talking about that. And I thank you. I only remember watching it like 100 times when I was younger, and so I did not know much on it. I have searched for a DVD or a copy of the VHS but to no avail. It is barely anywhere, though in hopes of sparking new interest I created that page. I thank you very very much <3 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nikamuu (talk • contribs)

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. The WikiWhippet (talk)05:16, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

???
In what was written, you added a tag and Bold text to the articles history. So I wrote of the test. I removed the text. I was recorded in the history removing it.Check. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by The WikiWhippet (talk • contribs) 05:27, 10 April 2007 (UTC). I have proof. *http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Black_Cut&diff=prev&oldid=121611332 Thats OK. Who put it back in? I'm investigating…
 * http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Black_Cut&diff=prev&oldid=121611661

List of Highlander cast members
Thank you for having assessed List of Highlander cast members, which I created. Could you tell me how I could improve it ? Basically I gathered all the names that belonged to the category and then organized them a bit. Now that the category is gone, I want that list to look good. Thank you very much for your help. Rosenknospe 14:47, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Thank you ! Rosenknospe 08:44, 11 April 2007 (UTC)

List of pubs
As someone who has contributed to the talk page discussion on List of publications in philosophy and/or that article's previous deletion debate, I thought you might be interested in participating in its new nomination for deletion which can be found here. Thanks. - KSchutte 17:30, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

Film vs. Movie
I wonder if film should be used for movie. I always thought film is verb and movie is noun.  ≈Tulkolahten≈ ≈talk≈ 07:20, 11 April 2007 (UTC)

Konjiki no Gash Bell!!: 101 Banme no Mamono

 * I'm a little confused about how this isn't a film, seeing as that it was released in theaters. ^_^ JuJube 06:21, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Yeah, IMDB can be dumb that way. Will an ANN link do? http://www.animenewsnetwork.com/encyclopedia/anime.php?id=3446 :) JuJube 07:04, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Yeah, it's a good first step. Unfortunately, since A-D is still working on subbing the movie, I can't contribute myself for a good long time. ^_^ Well, off to tipsy land, Lunesta sending me to la la land ^_^ JuJube 07:14, 14 April 2007 (UTC)

AWB edits
Please stop -- that's not how you request edits, it's a violation of WP:ASR. Requests like that should also be templates so they're not included within article forks. Matthew 18:31, 14 April 2007 (UTC)

I asked Matthew about it. I hope we find the proper way soon. If template is required, I'll do it for you. Hoverfish Talk 18:44, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
 * The talk page would probably be the best place for it, you can self ref. there. Matthew 18:52, 14 April 2007 (UTC)

Ok, here is your maintenance talk page template: Template:Film needs cast section. Have a nice slalom. Hoverfish Talk 19:06, 14 April 2007 (UTC) And don't let any others keep on the other way, please!! Hoverfish Talk 19:07, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
 * The category will not empty! It's the very same category the tamplate is assigning. But instead of finding the articles in the category, you will find their talk pages. Hoverfish Talk 19:13, 14 April 2007 (UTC)

need cast
THis is a quite brilliant idea -excellent job. YOu are so efficient!!!!!! THe only thing which might be useful perhaps is "needs cast details". Often many articles don't have an adequate cast section. What do you think? ♦ Sir Blofeld ♦ "Expecting you" Contribs 01:58, 9 April 2007 (UTC)

I dont' think as yet there is a category for missing cast but I feel it an important addition if so. Many articles only mention one of two actors not the cast and characters played -this should be regarded as important as the others, We should propose it at WP Film talk see what others think ♦ Sir Blofeld ♦  "Expecting you" Contribs 13:54, 10 April 2007 (UTC) Hi, I see already 370 articles in cat:articles that need a cast section. I think it's not a good practice to put this in the article pages. That's usually talk page categories. I'm affraid you guys will hear from the overcategorization deletionists and all your work will be wasted. It's good what you are doing, but if it's not too late I would suggest moving it to the talk pages. Also with all the requests for infoboxes and the people that left the effort, do you think this might get any following? Hoverfish Talk 18:10, 14 April 2007 (UTC)

you don't even have to make a template for it, just put the cat in the talk pages. But if you want to make one, just copy the code from (edit it and copy-paste) in your User:SkierRMH/Sandbox and change the text, image and the category it assigns and create it. But you have to talk with the others and make sure they all agree and do the same. Mind you also that there are others who want to hide all the talk page templates as clutter, so you may not gain much. So let's say I don't advice one more template. The important thing is they will appear all in the talk page category, even without template. The down part is you will have to click twice to reach the article page itself, but it might save your work. Hoverfish Talk 18:24, 14 April 2007 (UTC)

I'm suggesting you just move the category from the main pages to the talk pages, without creating a template for it. Hoverfish Talk 18:33, 14 April 2007 (UTC)

Good to see it has been created -I can go through that category now when I feel like and add cast sections to articles. Keep up the great tagging Mr Skier! ♦ Sir Blofeld ♦ "Expecting you" Contribs 11:07, 15 April 2007 (UTC)

year tagging
Thanks for finishing of those last few years of tagging for me mate :) I was starting to go a little loopy there for a minute :) Peter 01:22, 15 April 2007 (UTC)

Peer review/Ananthabhadram/archive1
Submitted Ananthabhadram for a peer review. Would you care to take a look? Aditya Kabir 05:30, 17 April 2007 (UTC)