User talk:Skylark777

Disambiguation link notification for March 6
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Unification Church, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Capuchin. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 6 March 2015 (UTC)

Question re "opinion"
Just curious -- in your penultimate edit summary (Laurence Tribe article), you referenced an "opinion" as not being notable -- are you referring to SCOTUS (Windsor v. United States) or to Tribe's own comments re Scalia? I am pretty positive it's the latter but just want to make sure I get your point before I (possibly) reply. Yours, Thanks, Quis separabit?  15:07, 29 September 2015 (UTC)
 * I just felt an quote about one person or one case having a whole paragraph in a short biography is too much. I have no opinion on the case or Mr. Tribe's statement. Skylark777 (talk) 17:53, 29 September 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:09, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Christian-Muslim unity
Hello Skylark777,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Christian-Muslim unity for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

 Onel 5969  TT me 02:47, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Thanks.Skylark777 (talk) 13:39, 15 January 2018 (UTC)