User talk:SlowlySurely

Welcome!

Hello, SlowlySurely, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ~~~~; this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! Jaxfl 00:47, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

5 Section Taijiquan[edit]

For future reference: if you have created an article and you are the primary author, the only one to have made substantial edits to the content, you can request that the article be deleted under the speedy deletion criterion WP:CSD#G7. I have deleted 5 Section Taijiquan under this criterion. --User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 00:23, 16 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:5 Section logo.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:5 Section logo.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We requires this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 11:05, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

5 Section Taijiquan (五段太極拳)[edit]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article 5 Section Taijiquan (五段太極拳), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of 5 Section Taijiquan (五段太極拳). Bradeos Graphon (talk) 21:59, 16 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of 5 Section Taijiquan (五段太極拳)[edit]

An article that you have been involved in editing, 5 Section Taijiquan (五段太極拳), has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/5 Section Taijiquan (五段太極拳). Thank you. Bradeos Graphon (talk) 04:13, 18 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings. The thing is, I don't myself really know if the article is a keeper or not, which is why I haven't speedy deleted but rather have turned it over to AfD while declining to give an opinion myself. I've heard of Masich and have even seen Liang before myself, so I know it is probably a real thing, but I don't think my experience is enough. What would settle keeping it for me, once and for all, would be a link or reference to a secondary source article. I know Liang Shouyu has had articles on him in Smalheiser's T'ai Chi Magazine, has there been any on 5 section Taijiquan? Any newspaper articles? That would help a lot.

The COI issue is only a suspicion, the issue of would someone who wasn't teaching the routine know enough about it to write an article without secondary sources?

The Chinese charatcers in the article title are easy to fix with a redirect.

I hope this helps. There is no animosity in this, I know you are new here, too. If it's a keeper we want it to be secure. If it isn't we can add the info to Liang's or Masich's articles. Regards, --Bradeos Graphon (talk) 14:19, 18 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]