User talk:Snoobysoo

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.
 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia&.
 * To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk, via real time chat with helpers, or on the [ reviewer's talk page]
 * Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! —  The   Earwig   (talk) 20:14, 13 July 2012 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.
 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia&.
 * To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk, via real time chat with helpers, or on the [ reviewer's talk page]
 * Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Smcg8374 (talk) 12:50, 18 July 2012 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Double Sunset, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you are more than welcome to continue submitting work to Articles for Creation. Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! Icy // ♫ 00:31, 20 July 2012 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Nomination of Jeff Kent (author) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jeff Kent (author) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Jeff Kent (author) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nonsenseferret (talk • contribs) 04:22, 10 January 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Acting Witan of Mercia concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Acting Witan of Mercia, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 13:56, 20 August 2013 (UTC)

Hi Hasteur Thank you for reminding me of that. I'm intending to edit the proposed article and attach more sources to satisfy the requirements, but it will be a time-consuming job to dig out the references and I'm heavily involved in a project at the moment, so I won't be able to do it soon. If the proposed article is deleted before I can get down to it, will I be able to retrieve in a deletion area and work on it there? Best wishes Snoobysoo
 * Per WP:REFUND/G13 if the article gets deleted before you can get to it, you can request restoration of the article (assuming it doesn't violate any other policies). You can also request that the page be Userfied to remove the possibility of being speedy deleted in this manner.  I leave the options up to you. Further, it's almost always a good thing to start a new section on the page if you're not directly responding to a previous thread. Hasteur (talk) 11:56, 22 August 2013 (UTC)

Your article submission Acting Witan of Mercia


Hello Snoobysoo. It has been over six months since you last edited your article submission, entitled Acting Witan of Mercia.

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the  or  code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code:, paste it in the edit box at this link , click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing.  DGG ( talk ) 01:39, 27 November 2013 (UTC)

A barnstar for you & Talkback!
 ·addshore·  talk to me! 16:29, 10 January 2015 (UTC)

Jeff Kent
Please could you confirm that you are aware of WP:REFSPAM and WP:COI, and perhaps clarify your relationship to Jeff Kent? With respect, the pattern of your edits is rather striking, to say the least, and I do wonder whether your sole motivation for editing is to improve the quality of Wikipedia. Dave.Dunford (talk) 23:09, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Yes, I'm generally aware of the various criteria/procedures for entries/editing. Jeff Kent is pretty well known to me, hence the reference information I've supplied, but I try to make all my edits objective and factual. My recent contributions have mainly been adding independent references to support notability and correcting information on various related subjects (to try to get aspects concerning the topic to be accurate [to my knowledge]). I usually concentrate on one subject at a time, hence the pattern you've identified, and am about to move on, having almost tidied this area up. I take your point, though, and will continue to be very careful that my edits are within the Wikipedia remit, as I do wish to play my small part in helping it to remain a quality encyclopedic source.Snoobysoo (talk) 10:35, 28 April 2015 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Acting Witan of Mercia has a new comment
 I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Acting Witan of Mercia. Thanks! FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 23:10, 4 May 2015 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Acting Witan of Mercia has been accepted
 Acting Witan of Mercia, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. . Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 17:58, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User_talk:Snoobysoo help desk] .
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:02, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:11, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Mercia
Hi Snoobysoo, I responded to you on the talk page for Mercia, where you'll also see that I made an edit to the article and explain why. Cheers. Nortonius (talk) 11:28, 6 July 2016 (UTC)

Jeff Kent
Are you Jeff Kent? If you are, this would pose some problems, although it might explain the pattern of editing on the Jeff Kent (author) article and elsewhere. Are you Jeff Kent? 2A02:C7E:1028:F700:5C08:189D:E0E6:91AB (talk) 21:11, 2 August 2022 (UTC)
 * See User talk:Snoobysoo above. User claims to know the author, but not to be him. Dave.Dunford (talk) 08:52, 3 August 2022 (UTC)
 * See the selfie of Jeff Kent, which Snoobysoo uploaded as "Own work". Whilst pretending, on many other pages, to be merely a close associate of Jeff Kent who writes lots of content which aligns with Jeff Kent's interests, and cites sources which are written and "published" by somebody called Jeff Kent. Because reliable sources don't say what Jeff Kent wants to say. 176.24.58.125 (talk) 14:39, 16 August 2022 (UTC)