User talk:Somenolife

March 2017
Hello, I'm Avataron. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Energy Management Center have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Pls discuss on the talk page of the article instead of simply reverting the changes, thanks. Avataron  talk 03:47, 18 March 2017 (UTC)

July 2017
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Republics of the Soviet Union, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. bonadea contributions talk 07:35, 28 July 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 10
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Tupi people, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Guaraní ([//toolserver.org/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Tupi_people check to confirm] | [//toolserver.org/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Tupi_people?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:53, 10 October 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 6
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited La Raza, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Spanish Africa ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/La_Raza check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/La_Raza?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:54, 6 August 2018 (UTC)

October 2018
Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did on Equipment of the Pakistan Army. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Adamgerber80 (talk) 03:16, 12 October 2018 (UTC)
 * As I stated before, the source is from the Type 81 page. If you have a problem with it, then delete it there but don't come threatening me.Somenolife (talk) 03:21, 12 October 2018 (UTC)
 * I have removed it from there as well. In the future, if your edit is reverted, discuss on the talk page rather than throwing blame somewhere else or reverting back. Adamgerber80 (talk) 03:23, 12 October 2018 (UTC)
 * I didn't think I was throwing blame somewhere else when I simply said that this was cited on the main page; I understand that reverting can appear to be "warring" but that wasn't my intention. I did not see any reason to open a talk page discussion on something that seemed trivial but I will try to avoid reverting.Somenolife (talk) 03:31, 12 October 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 26
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sinaloa Cartel, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page El Universal ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Sinaloa_Cartel check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Sinaloa_Cartel?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:25, 26 January 2019 (UTC)

April 2019
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Spanish omelette, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. ''In addition to our requirement for cited content, please do not mark edits as "minor" when introducing new content. This flag is reserved for actual minor changes, such as a spelling correction.'' Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 20:57, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
 * I added the literal English translation of 'tortilla española' which is 'Spanish tortilla'; this English translation is on the sidebar which is, itself, not cited. Seeing that, I assumed there wouldn't be a problem. I have no problem looking for a source but to avoid any future issues, I am asking for clarification on this.Somenolife (talk) 21:35, 22 April 2019 (UTC)

May 2020
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Kashmir conflict. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose their editing privileges. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to result in loss of your editing privileges. Thank you. Kautilya3 (talk) 21:07, 3 May 2020 (UTC)
 * I don't understand why you are accusing me of edit-warring on the Kashmir conflict page when I have only reverted you once as is allowed in a 24 hr period on said page. I merely mentioned Demchok on the page while you have reverted me twice; if I have been uncivil, please let me know.Somenolife (talk) 01:12, 4 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Agreed. You did not violate the edit restriction on the page. But your reinstatement still counts as edit warring because it is repeatedly making the same edit without paying attention to what has been said. Moreover, your edit summary is not at all clear: "Added Demchok since this area is the only part of Ladakh disputed between China and India whereas Pakistan claims the whole of Ladakh". China claims X, Pakistan claims Y, but the sentence you are editing is that of the Indian-administered part. So what is the connection? My edit summary said, "Demchok is part of Ladakh", meaning you can't say "Ladakh and Demchok". It would be like saying "Punjab and Sialkot".
 * If the Chinese claim is important (which I don't think it is, for the purpose of this page), we should discuss that separately, but not in the India-specific sentence. Perhaps not even in the lead, because it would be UNDUE.
 * As for Pakistan, it is not clear whether it claims it or not. Pakistan has not specified its idea of the Ladakh-China border. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 01:49, 4 May 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 25
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Coordination Committee of Maoist Parties and Organisations of South Asia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Communist Party of Nepal (Maoist). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:23, 25 August 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:30, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:50, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 23
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Black radical tradition, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Robert Williams.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:52, 23 June 2024 (UTC)