User talk:SpanishResident

Duplicate images uploaded
Thanks for uploading Image:AlicanteCoastBetweenPortandUrbanova.JPG. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you also uploaded the same image under the name Image:AlicanteCoastBetweenPortandUrbanova.jpg. The copy called Image:AlicanteCoastBetweenPortandUrbanova.jpg has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.

This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone, and you do not need to respond. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and refer to 'my contributions' to remind yourself exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot (talk) 19:14, 25 November 2007 (UTC)

Alicante
I have reverted an edit you recently made to the article Alicante. You restored some content I had removed earlier. I'm not sure if you are the original author of this text, but I still would like to inform you that Wikipedia is not a soapbox for opinions or original research. A ecis Brievenbus 21:47, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

Hi Aecis,

While I agree with you that "soapboxing" is better done on a blog than on Wikipedia, and I stand in awe of your Wiki-contriubutions, I have to insist that the contribution I made to Alicante under the Recent History of the Port section constitutes important public information and is objectively & carefully documented. If you feel that a word or phrase is too biased, by all means, make it more "neutral". But please do not delete hours of hard work, which in the end of the day is an attempt to document the modern and very recent history of the Port of Alicante.

You will see that I have run through my contribution is a bid to take out more partisan terms (it was done late at night with little time with the help of local neighbours and environmentalists), but this really is a political and social development that needs careful documenting. Thank you for your understanding, please let me have any suggestions if you still feel that my summary is not neutral enough.


 * I have raised this issue on the article's talk page, at Talk:Alicante. I have also requested the input of WikiProject Spain, at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Spain. For the time being, I recommend hiding this information from view, using . This would cover the information from "The port has been reinventing itself..." to "...who should do all in their power to defend the rights of the citizen in Alicante.”" The information you added would remain in the article, and it can be edited at any given moment, but it wouldn't be visible from the outside. If you want to see what it looks like, you can go to the section, select a random paragraph, click the "Insert hidden comment" button above the edit box, and click "Show preview". It shows you what it would look like, without saving the edit itself. If you have any questions about this, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page.  A  ecis Brievenbus 23:10, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

NowCommons: File:AlicanteCoastBetweenPortandUrbanova.JPG
File:AlicanteCoastBetweenPortandUrbanova.JPG is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:File:CostaparqueAlicante.jpg. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case:. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 12:05, 6 April 2009 (UTC)