User talk:Spirtzis

Welcome!
Thank you :) I'll get on it right now! Spirtzis (talk) 19:43, 19 March 2015 (UTC)

Talkback
CaroleHenson (talk) 20:57, 23 March 2015 (UTC)

Talkback
CaroleHenson (talk) 22:30, 23 March 2015 (UTC)

Cuthbert Ackroyd
Excellent job adding content to Cuthbert Ackroyd. It looks so much better and gives a much more well-rounded idea of who he was as a result!

It used to be a common practice to list the sources below and not put the citations inline, but that makes it much harder for the reader to research sources or figure out what content came from where. So, I assumed that all of your additions came from Burke and made them inline citations.

Could you help out with something? Do you know if any of the content that was in the article before your additions is also in Burkes? Then we can switch the "citation needed" tags to citations.

Great job!-- CaroleHenson (talk) 02:40, 25 March 2015 (UTC)


 * If you're interested, here are some books. That have information about him. And, you can format a citation using http://reftag.appspot.com/ - you just copy the url for the particular book you're referencing and click on "Load". Magic happens and the citation appears in the lower portion of the page that you can copy into the article.-- CaroleHenson (talk) 02:52, 25 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Thank you :) Some of the information was indeed from Burke which surprised me when I started editing, because I wondered how the original poster had included some but not all of the information provided by Burke. Also thanks for fixing the references thingy. About the books the Baron definetely seemed like an interesting person. Spirtzis (talk) 23:56, 25 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Hi! Glad to see you digging in so successfully! If you have a chance, would you mind adding the reference tags, as you see it typed here, to the places where there are citation needed tags, but the information is in Burke? Or, if you could let me know which sentences, I could add them. Thanks!-- CaroleHenson (talk) 03:48, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Sure thing. I will go add them.
 * Excellent, thanks!-- CaroleHenson (talk) 20:36, 26 March 2015 (UTC)

Reference errors on 26 March
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. as follows: Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/RBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/RBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=ReferenceBot%20–%20&section=new report it to my operator]. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:24, 27 March 2015 (UTC)
 * On the Cuthbert Ackroyd page, [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=653632950 your edit] caused a broken reference name (help) . ([ Fix] | [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&preload=User:ReferenceBot/helpform&preloadtitle=Referencing%20errors%20on%20%5B%5BSpecial%3ADiff%2F653632950%7CCuthbert Ackroyd%5D%5D Ask for help])
 * Fixed it. Thank you for the heads up. Spirtzis (talk) 00:32, 27 March 2015 (UTC)

Reply
Γεια χαρά, είδα ένα μήνυμα στο userpage μου, το talk page μου είναι στο User talk:Σούπερμαν για ό,τι χρειαστείς.

Μην ανυσηχείς για το edit στο Planetes, συχνά οι άλλοι συντάκτες αντιστρέφουν edits που κρίνουν πως δεν τηρούν τους κανονισμούς. Μπορείς αν θες να διαβάσεις μερικά πράγματα για την επεξεργασία λημμάτων στο Verifiability, No original research, What Wikipedia is not και Neutral point of view, που θα καλύψουν πολλές πιθανές απορίες σου --δυστυχώς ειδικά στην χώρα μας δεν μας τα μαθαίνουν αυτά στο σχολείο.

Πράγματι, είμαι Παοκτσής  Σούπερμα ν/  S u per-man  (talk!) 13:47, 27 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Ευχαριστώ για την απάντηση και τα links είναι όντως πολύ χρήσιμα! Μην με σκοτώσεις αλλά είμαι βάζελος XDSpirtzis (talk) 19:56, 27 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Κανένα πρόβλημα! Επίσης έχε υπ'όψην ότι στα bots, όπως παραπάνω, δεν χρειάζεται να απαντάς, είναι αυτοματοποιημένα και δεν βλέπει κανείς την απάντηση. Σούπερμα ν/  S u per-man  (talk!) 21:25, 27 March 2015 (UTC)

Europe 10,000 Challenge invite
Hi. The WikiProject Europe/The 10,000 Challenge has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like Germany, Italy, the Benelux countries, Iberian Peninsula, Romania, Slovenia etc, much like The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. If you would like to see masses of articles being improved for Europe and your specialist country like WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon, sign up today and once the challenge starts a contest can be organized. This is a way we can target every country of Europe, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant and also sign under any country sub challenge on the page that you might contribute to! Thank you. --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:09, 7 November 2016 (UTC)

Women in Red World Contest
Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

Orphaned non-free image File:Coat of Arms (Crest) of the City of Westmount (Canada).jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Coat of Arms (Crest) of the City of Westmount (Canada).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:09, 19 August 2022 (UTC)