User talk:Star-one

Meeting for worship
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Meeting for worship, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. For more information about Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, take a look at our Five Pillars. Happy editing! Alphax &tau;&epsilon;&chi; 15:19, 13 October 2005 (UTC)


 * Since I'm the one who deleted the entry, let me explain the reasons.
 * Contributions to wikipedia get licensed under GFDL (GNU Free Documentation License), about which you can read at the links at the bottom of any page. Notice however that GFDL explictly allows content to be used in commercial (that is for-profit) documents (so for example you could download whole wikipedia and sell it as long as you hold the clauses of the GFDL). Howwever the text contributed was taken from another source which explictly stated that only noncommercial (nonprofit) use was granted, thus it becomes incompatible with GFDL and we cannot host it (it becomes a copyrigth violation as we would be giving it away to commercial uses). I hope this clears the issue. -- (drini's page| &#x260E; ) 15:25, 13 October 2005 (UTC)


 * hi drini, just trying to get to the bottom of the problem here !
 * as well as being the original author of the page on wikipedia, i'm also the actual author of the text itself, & almost certainly the controller of the website or other publication you've seen which has the copyright/left notice which is causing difficulty.
 * i accept aphax's view that there probably needs to be some text editing to make it more suitable for wikipedia than its original usage, but i do think substantially the article is of use on wikipedia to expand its coverage of quakerism, so please let me know what needs changing, either here or elsewhere, to make that happen.
 * simon


 * I don't know about the content (neutral point of view, cleanup etc). My only concern is about the licensing terms, and you being aware that if you repost the content, it will allow commercial use too. -- (drini's page| &#x260E; ) 15:59, 13 October 2005 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Wgyf-1985.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Wgyf-1985.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the image, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created the image yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the image on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the image yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the image also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture then you can use GFDL to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the image qualifies as fair use, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other images, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of image pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Admrb♉ltz (T | C) 18:10, 28 January 2006 (UTC)

Image:Wgyf-2005.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded, Image:Wgyf-2005.jpg, has been listed at Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Admrb♉ltz (T | C) 18:10, 28 January 2006 (UTC)

Birmingham
I changed your wording back for the article's introductory paragraph because I think 'many' is too vague. Being objective I think 'generally' is entirely fair - especially by reference to, for instance, references from any reputable news source. For example, see what a search for 'second city' brings up on the BBC (you'll have to ignore things such as 'Durham is the second city to consider implementing a congestion charge': http://search.bbc.co.uk/cgi-bin/search/results.pl?scope=all&edition=d&q=%22second+city%22&go.x=23&go.y=17&go=go Matthew 16:00, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Just to clarify - I certainly didn't find 'second city' being used of Manchester except in reference to the MORI poll from 2002. In general parlance, 'second city' is used to refer to Birmingham only as far as I can tell. Matthew 16:01, 19 September 2006 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Simon Gray (composer)
An editor has nominated Simon Gray (composer), an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 09:59, 6 February 2008 (UTC)

Transwiki to a more suitable site
As your article is currently under review for deletion, you may wish to consider transferring it to Wikipopuli, a wiki that hosts biographical articles and does not impose a notability requirement. TheYellowCabin (talk) 14:49, 6 February 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Microgroove (band)


A tag has been placed on Microgroove (band) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Rwiggum (Talk /Contrib ) 17:40, 28 May 2011 (UTC)

Page protection
Hi Star-one, I noticed your addition of a protection template to Kay Burley. Page protection is requested at WP:RFPP, but make sure you read the Protection Policy first. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 11:03, 5 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Also, with regards to this article: please note Wikipedia's WP:BLP policy, which says that unsourced or poorly sourced negative material about living people must not be added to Wikipedia. All negative allegations about living people must have a reliable source; and YouTube is not a reliable source by our standards. Removing such BLP-violating material is not vandalism by our standards. Thanks for reading. Robofish (talk) 14:19, 5 October 2012 (UTC)
 * huh? are you saying a youtube clip of an individual doing something is not a reliable source of somebody doing something? Star-one (talk) 15:22, 5 October 2012 (UTC)
 * No, he's saying its not a reliable source for statements about "the child's godmother", or putting anything under a heading of "criticism", which cannot be determined from the clip. Andy Mabbett ( Pigsonthewing ); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 16:00, 5 October 2012 (UTC)
 * the reference to the child's godmother had already been deleted; it appears that other people had already also provided the citations of the actual criticism on the talk page before robofish removed the section anyway. Star-one (talk) 16:06, 5 October 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 3
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * English Disco Lovers (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to EDL


 * Google bomb (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to EDL

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:59, 3 February 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 16
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2001: A Space Odyssey (film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Symphony Hall (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:56, 16 June 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 24
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited University (Birmingham) railway station, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page William Rogers. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:11, 24 September 2015 (UTC)

Your contributed article, Snot (nasal mucus)


Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Snot (nasal mucus). First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Mucus. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Mucus. If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Dorsetonian (talk) 18:35, 6 February 2018 (UTC)

February 2018
Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give Mucus a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into another page with a different name. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Requests for history merge. Thank you. Cabayi (talk) 19:35, 6 February 2018 (UTC)

Neil Gaiman
Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Neil Gaiman. Thank you. —David Eppstein (talk) 17:53, 13 January 2021 (UTC)

Please stop adding unreferenced or poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial, to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Neil Gaiman. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. —David Eppstein (talk) 21:23, 13 January 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 29 November 2022 (UTC)