User talk:StenssonSK

Welcome!
Hi StenssonSK! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! Berig (talk) 20:08, 26 April 2021 (UTC)

Thank you very much! I'll do my best. It is very rewarding if one can help a little. StenssonSK (talk) 20:34, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
 * If you need any help, just leave me a message.--Berig (talk) 14:06, 27 April 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Ingvar Expedition
Hello, StenssonSK. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Ingvar Expedition, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:02, 1 January 2022 (UTC)


 * The page has been developed since you wrote your note above. You have most certainly noticed that, but anyway - sorry I didn't notice it until now. StenssonSK (talk) 07:31, 31 July 2022 (UTC)

Carl L. Thunberg
Hi, I am not at all sure what is happening over at Carl L. Thunberg, but the claims being made for him seem far too large for his very limited activities. He seems to be a minor popular historian and in charge of a country museum, neither of which exactly qualify him for being described as a professional historian or archaeologist. I see you've also edited the museum article, so I wonder if your enthusiasm for the area has not led you to talk up Thunberg somewhat. Please note that his own publications do not provide evidence of notability; obviously, reviews by scholars or newspapers of his works would be proof that he is indeed notable. Right now, he looks a very doubtful candidate for a Wikipedia article of his own. I've tagged the article for notability and possible conflict of interest, though it may well be that neither you nor other editors have more than local matters at heart. It is essential, however much you like or admire the man or the museum, that you write about him strictly neutrally, using reliable independent sources. All the best, Chiswick Chap (talk) 09:08, 18 May 2023 (UTC)


 * Dear Chiswick Chap, Mr. Alexander,
 * Thank you for your friendlier response,
 * I am not the person who would hold on and "fight" in matters like this, far from it. And as I said on Thunberg's talk page, I absolutely do not want to cause any problems and worries, and especially not for Thunberg, who is a living person who has done nothing wrong.
 * One aspect that appears to be particularly important in this though, and which I want to point out with determination, is the fact that there are actually many published scholarly works that cite Thunberg's work. Good examples of such works that quote him are:
 * Beronius Jörpeland, Lena; Göthberg, Hans; Seiler, Anton; Wikborg, Jonas (eds.) (2017). At Upsalum – människor och landskapande. Utbyggnad av Oskustbanan genom Gamla Uppsala. Arkeologerna Statens historiska museer, Upplandsmuseet and Societas Archaeologica Upsaliensis ; Pedersen, Anne & Sindbæk, Søren M. (eds.). 2020. Viking Encounters: Proceedings of the Eighteenth Viking Congress ; Sorgenfrei, Simon (2018). Islam i Sverige de första 1300 åren ; Wolf, Kirsten; Mueller-Wollmer, Tristan (2018). The Vikings: Facts and Fictions ; Saenko, Alexandr (2021). ”The battle of Fyrisvellir as dualistic ’Cornerstone’ of Swedish andDanish historiography”. In: Humanities and Law Studies Scientific Bulletin, 1, 2021. FederalState Autonomous Educational Institution for Higher Education, Moscow.
 * Best regards, and probably enough from me in this matter, StenssonSK (talk) 09:59, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Best regards, and probably enough from me in this matter, StenssonSK (talk) 09:59, 18 May 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:55, 28 November 2023 (UTC)


 * I haven't been logged in for quite a while and missed this unfortunately, but I am otherwise generally interested to participate in things like this. Best regards/ StenssonSK (talk) 00:29, 26 April 2024 (UTC)