User talk:Summerinside

Speedy deletion of Tarck bike
A tag has been placed on Tarck bike requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. tennis man  23:41, 30 January 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Tarck bike
A tag has been placed on Tarck bike, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Tagishsimon (talk) 00:12, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
 * I have contested the speedy deletion of the article since I see potential notability. You need to keep improving the article if you want to see it remain. It is critically important for you to add reliable sources immediately. Royal broil  03:33, 31 January 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Tarck bike
I have nominated Tarck bike, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Tarck bike. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Tagishsimon (talk) 03:33, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

Image:Animal_Chin_Chicago.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Animal_Chin_Chicago.jpg, has been listed at Images and media for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Kelly hi! 15:02, 28 March 2008 (UTC)

Tarck bike AfD, 2nd nomination
I have nominated Tarck bike for deletion. As mentioned in the discussion, this entry is a neologism and fails to meet WP:V. Correct me if I'm mistaken, but it also seems you removed the merge tag despite the decision to merge the article at the close of the previous AfD discussion. The discussion can be found at Articles for deletion/Tarck bike (2nd nomination). --Gerta (talk) 21:00, 21 July 2008 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Animal Chin Chicago.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Animal Chin Chicago.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly hi! 04:52, 25 December 2010 (UTC)