User talk:Supershow

I'm Done
Thank you for all the years, but I'm gone from wikipedia. Everybody do well. And happy new years

Archives
Archive 1

Welcome back
Just like to say hi to everyone. Thanks for a great first year. Try to be nice in approaching my articles. I was new. We all were. I Tried my best. I don't have to sign on my own page.

Visual Kei
I am contacting a few people in the WikiProject Music genres project to please come and give a Neutral point of view on if we should consider Visual Kei a "genre". There is currently an edit war that has been going on since January of 2007 - we really some outside opinions. I have put some information on the WP Music Genres talk page, if you have time to look. Thanks either way. Denaar 06:47, 6 August 2007 (UTC)

History of Stoke City F.C.
Hi, I had to revert your edit as it repeated a lot of the text and references (probably a WP bug) and I couldn't work out how to fix it without reverting. Please feel free to add your edit again and sorry for any inconvenience. Dave101 →talk  11:46, 23 August 2007 (UTC)

Peer review/Geography of Newfoundland and Labrador/archive1
Please do not change comments by other editors or reviewers: it is impolite and misleading. If you disagree with what was said, add your own comments. Silverchemist 13:31, 1 October 2007 (UTC)

ACID Atom
The article Atom, which you voted for the Article Collaboration and Improvement Drive on August 19, and was removed on September 11, because on one got around to choosing it as the winner, has been renominated and needs votes. Zginder 16:02, 10 November 2007 (UTC)

League of Copyeditors roll call
Melon ‑ Bot  ( STOP! )  18:26, 28 December 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Abefrontsmall.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Abefrontsmall.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 05:07, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:LouisvilleCatbirds.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:LouisvilleCatbirds.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 18:37, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Raycashdelivery.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Raycashdelivery.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 04:03, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Scb1cover.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Scb1cover.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 05:09, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

GA Sweeps invitation
Hello, I hope you are doing well. I am sending you this message since you are listed as a GA reviewer. I would like to invite you to consider helping with the GA sweeps process. Sweeps helps to ensure that the oldest GAs still meet the criteria, and improve the quality of GAs overall. Unfortunately, last month only two articles were reviewed. This is definitely a low point after our peak at the beginning of the process when 163 articles were reviewed in September 2007. After nearly two years, the running total has just passed the 50% mark. In order to expediate the reviewing, several changes have been made to the process. A new worklist has been created, detailing which articles are left to review. All exempt and previously reviewed articles have already been removed from the list. Instead of reviewing by topic, you can consider picking and choosing whichever articles interest you.

We are always looking for new members to assist with the remaining articles, so if you are interested or know of anybody that can assist, please visit the GA sweeps page. In addition, for every member that reviews 100 articles or has a significant impact on the process, s/he will get an award when they reach that threshold. If only 14 editors achieve this feat starting now, we would be done with Sweeps! Of course, having more people reviewing less articles would be better for all involved, so please consider asking others to help out. Feel free to stop by and only review a few articles, something's better than nothing! Take a look at the list, and see what articles interest you. Let's work to complete Sweeps so that efforts can be fully focused on the backlog at GAN. If you have any questions about the process, reviewing, or need help with a particular article, please contact me or OhanaUnited and we'll be happy to help. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 07:32, 16 May 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Scb1cover.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Scb1cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:


 * I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
 * I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
 * If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
 * To opt out of these bot messages, add  to your talk page.
 * If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:46, 28 May 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Abefrontsmall.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Abefrontsmall.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:


 * I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
 * I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
 * If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
 * To opt out of these bot messages, add  to your talk page.
 * If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:29, 23 June 2010 (UTC)

Acid blues listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Acid blues. Since you had some involvement with the Acid blues redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Gyrofrog (talk) 23:37, 5 December 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Lonie Walker


The article Lonie Walker has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * No reliable sources found.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 11:41, 24 December 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Marshall Lawrence


A tag has been placed on Marshall Lawrence requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 11:43, 24 December 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Marshall Lawrence


The article Marshall Lawrence has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Very little notability. No sources found that do anything more than name-drop. Article not improved after copyvio and puffery removed.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 19:16, 24 December 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Colossal Connection for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Colossal Connection is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Colossal Connection until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Feed back  ☎ 04:36, 14 April 2013 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:06, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

1980 in rock listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect 1980 in rock. Since you had some involvement with the 1980 in rock redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 21:57, 19 January 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Hoopfest for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hoopfest is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Hoopfest until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 02:54, 18 January 2018 (UTC)

"Orange ball" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Orange ball and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 February 20 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Hog Farm Talk 01:26, 20 February 2022 (UTC)