User talk:Supreme Deliciousness/Archives/2012/June

Crossing out socks
It's good you take the time to cross out comments left by confirmed sockpuppets on Discussion pages. Lest one get the impression – hopefully the wrong impression – that your actions are directed specifically at socks advocating only one side of POV dispute in the topic area, here are two more socks whose messages you should cross out: Special:Contributions/Vatan79, Special:Contributions/VivaWikipedia. You can find their case documented here.—Biosketch (talk) 20:42, 18 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Again leave it to Biosketch to demonstrate complete pettiness. Considering your presumed knowledge of how things work on the internet, why don't you cross them out on your own? SD is free to cross out/not cross out what ever socks he/she wants to. -asad (talk) 21:12, 18 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Well. Some monkey on my back you're starting to become. Whatever crisis it is you're going through in your personal life, Asad, I'd mighty appreciate if you'd stop projecting your frustrations onto me. This puerile trolling for which you appear to have developed a penchant of late is beginning to reach a level that I'm finding irritating. It's not at that level yet, but I encourage you to find more constructive things to occupy your time here with than following me around to leave whiny comments like those of an indignant adolescent.—Biosketch (talk) 13:18, 19 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Please remove your personal attack against me. -asad (talk) 16:09, 19 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Also, you may wish do rediscover what the word "trolling means". Trolling would be indicated by me going through your contributions searching for stuff to bug you about. But, as a matter of fact, this is our second "encounter" in about a months time that happen to be on two talk pages that I have on my watch list due to the fact we all have a persist vandal in common. So when I open a page that I have watched to find you either a) instructing a user to do something citing non-existing WP policy or b) telling a user that their strike-throughs should be of socks on both "sides" of the debate. Talk about irritating. -asad (talk) 16:24, 19 June 2012 (UTC)