User talk:Supreme Deliciousness/Archives/2020/November

Warring
SD, stop edit-warring at Syrian Kurdistan. The RfC moderator has urged you to accept the clean-up while discussion continues, and I urge you likewise. Enough is enough. Konli17 (talk) 16:08, 16 November 2020 (UTC)

You're projecting again. Konli17 (talk) 19:38, 17 November 2020 (UTC)

There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. GPinkerton (talk) 12:00, 22 November 2020 (UTC)

Preferred pronouns
Hi I try to use singular they until I know someone's preference, but since you don't declare a preference on your userpage, and we are engaged in what looks like it might be a lengthy talk page discussion, I thought I should do you the courtesy of trying to find out. I am not asking you to declare your gender, which is of course absolutely none of my business, simply how you would prefer to be addressed. If you think that this question is an impertinence, please by all means revert this edit. Best Girth Summit  (blether)  20:27, 24 November 2020 (UTC)
 * I'm a man.--Supreme Deliciousness (talk) 06:25, 25 November 2020 (UTC)

November 2020
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 hour for not assuming good faith; accusing other editors of cherrypicking, as you did at Special:Diff/991164254. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. —valereee (talk) 17:24, 28 November 2020 (UTC)
 * So if I point out that someone is cherry picking sources, how does that justify a block? Thats how I viewed the situation. --Supreme Deliciousness (talk) 17:32, 28 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Talk about the edits, not the editor. Assume good faith. Pointing out that someone is cherrypicking sources is assuming bad faith. —valereee (talk) 17:38, 28 November 2020 (UTC)
 * , I said "cherry picked sources", so I was specifically talking about the suggested edit. --Supreme Deliciousness (talk) 17:56, 28 November 2020 (UTC)
 * SD, sorry, lots of things to reply to right now and a busy day. When we say "cherrypicked sources", what other editors hear is "this editor cherrypicked these sources." A better choice would be to say "these sources aren't a complete representation of reliable sources on the issue." That takes the editor out of it and focuses on the sources. —valereee (talk) 20:56, 28 November 2020 (UTC)

Archived apology for incorrect block --Supreme Deliciousness (talk) 10:50, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
 * FTR, the block wasn't "incorrect". It was less-than-ideal, and I should have chosen a better response. If I had it to do again, I'd have blocked you only from the article in question, and probably for a week. —valereee (talk) 18:55, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
 * That would be a ban, not a block.--Supreme Deliciousness (talk) 19:33, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
 * We have partial blocks now, a recent development. We can block editors from editing one or up to I believe ten articles. —valereee (talk) 19:47, 29 November 2020 (UTC)