User talk:Supreme Deliciousness/Archives/2021/October

Unexplained "disputed" tag
Hi Supreme,



The disputed inline tag appears to be originated by you (I can't find that it had existed previor to this edit). But I don't see any explanation about what is disputed. Based on your preventing removal of the tag under 500/30 ARBPIA, I assume it's not something as simple as the mere fact of which cemetery and its GPS coordinates. Could you clarify what your concern is (or if there was a previous explained-but-unresolved concern raised by someone else)? DMacks (talk) 09:40, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
 * The tag was added because someone added "Israel", after the occupied and disputed city of Jerusalem. The IP is therefor violating the 500/30 rule by removing the tag. If you take a look at Jerusalems main page, it is presented as being disputed and the fringe Israeli pov is not presented as a fact. That same consensus should be used in other articles that mention Jerusalem. If someone would like to change this, they must open a new discussion at the main Jerusalem article and get a new consensus. --Supreme Deliciousness (talk) 15:50, 9 October 2021 (UTC)