User talk:Surajt88/Archive 7

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 20:05, 4 July 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 4 July 2011
Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 11:43, 5 July 2011 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 18:05, 11 July 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 11 July 2011
Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 01:38, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

Puzzled by your reversion
Hi. I'm really puzzled and hurt by your reversion of my contributions to David Meerman Scott. Can you elaborate? Maybe the TW bot made a mistake? (I'm watching this page so you can reply here.) Woz2 (talk) 11:21, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Hello Woz2. I am really sorry if I hurt u, which you can be assured I dint mean to. The first thing that struck me was the title of the subsection. Next, blogs and social network websites cannot be trusted as reliable sources for information added to Wikipedia (see: Reliable sources. Hence, at first glance, they appeared as vandalism and I thought it was best to remove the content till the editor finds more reliable sources. Suraj T  11:34, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
 * I have undone your last revision to David Meerman Scott as I could not establish the reliability of the sources. Suraj T  11:43, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Please assume good faith and not accuse your fellow editors of vandalism lightly. The blog refs are known to me to be accurate but I've removed them in any case in an over abundance of caution. Hope it's OK now. Woz2 (talk) 12:29, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Sorry if my tone made you feel I was accusing you. But still you have twitter.com, which is a social networking site, as a reference. And snappytv.com is not a reliable source for information. Even if you know the facts to be true, the information must be verifiable (see: Verifiability). I think it will be best to discuss this here. Cheers. Suraj  T  12:44, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
 * OK I commented there. BTW, maybe you're not aware of this but when you use TW as you did, the message I see in the history is "(Reverted 6 edits by Woz2 (talk) identified as vandalism to last revision by Nick Number. (TW)) (undo)" . I don't use Twinkle, but I think you can/should set it to say "Revert good faith edits..." instead. Woz2 (talk) 14:14, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Hello Woz2. What it says is in the history of the article. All that can be done is to revert what I have done. And you have undone my edit yourself. Please remember that what I did was in the interest of the article and I have nothing personal against you. And I expect you to act with the same intentions. Cheers. Suraj  T  04:51, 14 July 2011 (UTC)

FYI
- F ASTILY  (TALK) 18:51, 13 July 2011 (UTC)

A kitten for you!
Thanks for the brownie. Please keep up your diligent editing.

Woz2 (talk) 11:38, 18 July 2011 (UTC) 


 * Thanks Woz2! Suraj  T  04:12, 19 July 2011 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:51, 18 July 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 18 July 2011
Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 01:31, 19 July 2011 (UTC)

Your request for rollback
Hi Surajt88. After reviewing your request for rollback, I have enabled rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback: If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see New admin school/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing!  F ASTILY  (TALK) 22:44, 19 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
 * Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
 * Rollback should never be used to edit war.
 * If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
 * Use common sense.

Category:Renewable energy
Per Categorization please stop adding parent category Category:Renewable energy to the all articles about photovoltaic power stations. --Jklamo (talk) 11:48, 20 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Right. Sorry. Is it going to be reverted or shall I do it now? Suraj  T  11:51, 20 July 2011 (UTC)
 * I think you can revert it. And be carefull next time, when adding general categories, because simply categories are not tags. --Jklamo (talk) 11:59, 20 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Righto. Thanks. Suraj  T  12:01, 20 July 2011 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:43, 25 July 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 25 July 2011
Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 23:51, 25 July 2011 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!
Thanks Gurt Posh..:-) Suraj  T  04:03, 29 July 2011 (UTC)