User talk:Surge Of Reason

Welcome!
Hi Surge Of Reason, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like it here and decide to stay. Our intro page provides helpful information for new users—please check it out! If you have any questions, you can get help from experienced editors at the Teahouse. Happy editing! Grand&#39;mere Eugene (talk) 11:31, 23 February 2022 (UTC)

Arbitration Request

 * This isn't a matter for Arbitration. No comment on the rest of the contents of the appeal. Barkeep49 (talk) 20:25, 16 April 2022 (UTC)
 * And this backhanded edit summary isn't appropriate .  Acroterion   (talk)   21:10, 17 April 2022 (UTC)


 * (°〇°) I could go on for a long time about the things that are inappropriate around here. Unfortunately, the act of doing so would be considered inappropriate.

You are not allowed to remove declined unblock requests. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 00:54, 18 April 2022 (UTC)

Talk page access revoked
Since you seem to be unable to structure an unblock request that anyone would even consider unblocking you for, and since your unblock requests don't want to address any of the issues raised in the ANI thread that was headed towards having you blocked even before your completely unacceptable group attacks, I've removed your talk page access to prevent this from becoming more of a time sink to editors. If you wish to have your unblock requests treated seriously going forward, you'll need to go through the WP:UTRS system. Canterbury Tail talk 12:32, 18 April 2022 (UTC)

Your emails
Hello. As you were advised above, this is not a case for arbitration. Otherwise, I can only strongly echo the advice to follow the terms of the standard offer, and wait for your appeal to be processed. --BDD (talk) 01:25, 25 April 2022 (UTC)


 * I expect what BDD wrote is a disappointing answer but it is the answer. Further emails along these lines will likely result in your email access being turned off. Barkeep49 (talk) 15:27, 25 April 2022 (UTC)


 * is closed. -- Deep fried okra ( talk ) 22:55, 7 May 2022 (UTC)


 * I have added the pertinent email addendum to the ticket. Please note that you were blocked for personal attacks and not vandalism. Please note that your response regarding dealing with content disputes was insufficient. Please see WP:DR. I see a checkuser notice on your user page, so apparently you were evading a block or using multiple accounts. Ultimately, you will need a checkuser to agree to unblocking you Best,  -- Deep fried okra  ( talk ) 18:37, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
 * In reply to your email, your block log shows you were blocked for personal attacks and harassment
 * 12:30, 18 April 2022 Canterbury Tail ...  changed block settings for Surge Of Reason ... with an expiration time of indefinite (account creation blocked, cannot edit own talk page) (Personal attacks or violations of the harassment policy)
 * 13:49, 23 March 2022 Canterbury Tail ... blocked Surge Of Reason ... with an expiration time of indefinite (account creation blocked) (Personal attacks or violations of the harassment policy) -- Deep fried okra ( talk ) 19:48, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
 * I had quite forgotten this ANI thread -- Deep fried okra ( talk ) 19:52, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
 * PS. It had not been 48 hours. -- Deep fried okra  ( talk ) 20:10, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
 * A strict reading of policy says that anyone could unblock this account. It's only when a CheckUser changes the block rationale to use Checkuserblock-account, CheckUser block, or Checkuserblock-wide that policy mandates a CheckUser review.  I don't know if everyone on Arbcom would agree with that interpretation of policy, but that's how I personally see it. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 09:31, 14 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Thanks, but given the consequences of undoing a check user block, and as you say, not all Arb's might agree, better safe than sorry. -- Deep fried okra  ( talk ) 14:37, 17 May 2022 (UTC)

Apology
You have not personally wounded or offended me, so you have nothing to apologize to me for. Best. -- Deep fried okra ( talk ) 14:39, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
 * I also do not need an apology no, there's nothing personal going on here just editors trying to make the best of what we have and sometimes people's emotions get caught up in it. Canterbury Tail talk 19:25, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Seems a bunch of people got those e-mail apologies. I'd forgotten about the incident, of course, but given the sentence I got of "Will you support my unblock request so I can advance knowledge about companies and protect people from financial ruin and humiliation?" it's pretty clear that Surge of Reason still doesn't get it, and likely never will.   Ravenswing      19:20, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Yeah we're not here to help people make financial investment decisions, we're an encyclopaedia. Canterbury Tail talk 20:01, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Stop sending me emails. If you have something to complain about, do it here. Oh and it’s not “my encyclopedia”. Canterbury Tail talk 01:15, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
 * There's a link in those e-mails you can click to block future e-mails from him. I just used it, myself. (Psst: he CAN'T talk about it here. You removed his talk page access.)   Ravenswing      01:54, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Oops, oh yeah. Forgot about that. That's old age for you. <b style="color: Blue;">Canterbury Tail</b> <i style="color: Blue;">talk</i> 11:28, 19 May 2022 (UTC)

A word of advice it might be best if you stop sending e-mails eliciting support for an unblock. For a start many of us are not admins, and so can't even comment at a UTRS appeal. Secondly, you were blocked for many reasons, not just being rude to people (and I doubt most of them would have even supported your block for just upsetting them). Third, and I really can't emphasize this strongly enough, from my perspective the fact you are trying so hard to get an unblock means you are here for a reason, and that is not to build an encyclopedia, but to push an agenda. You need to demonstrate that is not the case, not to me but to the admins at UTRS. Slatersteven (talk) 10:27, 19 May 2022 (UTC)

And your latest email to me tells me you are also not all that sincere with your apologies, as rather than address the issue I raised you said "Well you were apologized to anyway, for all the good it did." (as if that was all that was needed). Slatersteven (talk) 17:41, 20 May 2022 (UTC)

Trolling
has been declined, obviously. User is not eligible for unblock consideration under WP:SO until 2022-11-30 and will then need to account for deliberately wasting our time on UTRS. --Yamla (talk) 21:03, 30 May 2022 (UTC)

Unblock request via new account
See User talk:Passionate Dynamo and contributions. They've been directed to the SO page for instructions on how to appropriately request unblocking under the terms of SO.  Acroterion   (talk)   13:03, 2 December 2022 (UTC)

was neither concise nor clear. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 09:26, 5 June 2023 (UTC)