User talk:SwordofStorms

Welcome!

Hello, SwordofStorms, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, your edit to Talk:Samus Aran does not conform to Wikipedia's Neutral Point of View policy (NPOV). Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media.

There's a page about the NPOV policy that has tips on how to effectively write about disparate points of view without compromising the NPOV status of the article as a whole. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Below are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! -- KRAPENHOEFFER!  TALK  04:57, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Simplified Manual of Style
 * A personal note that you should also review WP:BLP, and review the currently active Discretionary Sanctions surrounding articles that are related to the Gamergate controversy. -- KRAPENHOEFFER!   TALK  05:00, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
 * It's worth noting that talk page entries do not have to be NPOV. Thanks. &#124; Naypta✉ opened his mouth at 08:33, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Other edits were indicative of POV-pushing, and the edits on the talk page were libelous in nature. This was just the best template I could find for the situation. -- KRAPENHOEFFER!   TALK  14:30, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

As I failed to follow the proper procedure
-- KRAPENHOEFFER!  TALK  14:54, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

January 2022
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Languages of North America, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. BilCat (talk) 19:28, 2 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Rather than removing my factually correct edits wouldn't it have been more prescient to simply add the sources used on the pages linked of the three distinct North American dialects I added? I get the policy, just a critique of how you go about correcting peopleSwordofStorms (talk) 19:39, 2 January 2022 (UTC)


 * If I'd been familiar enough with the topic, I might have done that, especially if I'd had access to the sources. But to be honest, that's your responsibility, as you added the content. If you need help citing the sources, I'm happy to help out, but I don't have the time to run down every unsourced edit I find, nor should I. I'm sorry if that sounds callous, but as the person adding the content, you're the one most familiar with where it came from, and thus the best person to cite your own additions. BilCat (talk) 19:57, 2 January 2022 (UTC)