User talk:SystemBuilder

NP (complexity)
Hi there, and welcome to Wikipedia! Sorry I hastily reverted some of your changes on NP (complexity). I've looked over them and they seem quite appropriate, although perhaps slightly redundant with some of the material in Complexity classes P and NP. I had some friendly advice for your future editing &mdash; please don't feel intimidated, I invite you to continue your editing whether or not you follow it, and to create an account so that you can get a free user page and create an identity others will be able to trust.

My advice:
 * Try to avoid excessive use of quotes:
 * Although it's good to identify phrases that are intended to be informal, it's better to avoid oversimplification in the first place by making statements that are literally true (and so don't require quotes).
 * Don't quote terms that are real, meaningful terms such as decision problem (you can italicize them when using them as words or introducing them)
 * Where possible and clear, use real terms instead of made-up terms in quotes. For example, correctness is the real term for "rightness".
 * Never ever use quotes for emphasis.
 * If only part of the phrase is informal, just quote that part.
 * "NP Turing machines" don't technically exist; nondeterministic Turing machines do, and NP is typically defined as the set of problems that nondeterministic machines can solve in polynomial time. Attempting to create a class of machines that solve exactly the problems in NP is actually rather complicated, so people don't typically do this.
 * Typically math and computer science people prefer lowercase variables to uppercase ones, unless there are so many variables floating around that they need to use both. Why this is, I don't know, but it's the convention.
 * Remember that many articles have a general readership; try not to assume too much about a person's background, such as specialized vocabulary or knowledge of certain facts or processes. On the other hand, don't spend too much time reviewing related material &mdash; a brief one or two sentence review and a link should be sufficient.

I hope this helps! Deco 02:25, 4 Apr 2005 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:Illiac II Control Panel.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Illiac II Control Panel.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Media copyright questions. 21:08, 12 January 2007 (UTC)

PLATO user interface innovations
Hello &mdash; The long-ago creators of the PLATO system actively sought a design that wouldn't confuse or intimidate users who were new to computers, including young children. (To use an anachronistic term, they wanted PLATO to be &ldquo;user friendly&rdquo;.) In particular, there were multiple innovations in the layout of the PLATO IV keyset (File:PLATO4kb.jpg) which I'd like to mention in a Wikipedia article. Might you know of any published writings on the design rationale of the PLATO IV terminal? Thanks! { 50.181.30.121 (talk) 20:34, 3 May 2014 (UTC)

Unfortunately you weren't logged in when you sent this message, so I cannot reach you. I recommend that you connect with the PLATO Programmers group on LinkedIn :.

Disambiguation link notification for July 18
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited PARC Universal Packet, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page XNS. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 18 July 2015 (UTC)

Chromebook
Thanks for adding information from your own personal experiences to Wikipedia, but, being an encyclopedia, we don't accept original research. All text added must be cited ti reliable sources so that it is verifiable. - Ahunt (talk) 23:18, 27 July 2019 (UTC)

Your are being discussed at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.--Eyebeller (talk) 19:54, 17 November 2020 (UTC)

Note regarding Donald B. Gillies
I have suppressed a recent edit that you submitted to the article Donald B. Gillies because you added a link to what appears to be a private email correspondence that contains the phone numbers of non-public individuals. In order to protect the privacy of non-public individuals, Wikipedia has a policy of removing this information if it is added. Please do not reinsert that link into Wikipedia. I will also note that in general it is not a good idea to use private email correspondence as sources of information on Wikipedia. One of our core content policies is a policy called "no original research", which states that all information on Wikipedia must be attributable to published, reliable sources, such as reputable news organization, published books, academic journals, etc. Because private email correspondence is not published in a reliable source, it is inappropriate for use on Wikipedia.

Additionally, I would like to caution you about our policy on edit warring. In general, if you have a disagreement with another editor about article content, you should discuss the issue rather than continue to repeatedly revert the other's edits. Repeatedly reverting is problematic because it often leads to animosity between editors and is a form of disruptive editing. In particular, we have a bright-line rule called the three-revert rule, which states that editors may not make more than three reverts on a single article in a 24 hour period. You appear to have exceeded the three-revert rule already on the Donald B. Gillies article, so this is a warning that a further revert may result in you being blocked from editing to prevent the disruption associated with edit warring. I hope this information is helpful. Please let me know if you have any questions, and I would be happy to clarify anything. Mz7 (talk) 21:11, 17 November 2020 (UTC)

Comment on your ANI case
Hi, I'm User:CodeTalker. I've noticed your recent frustration with the edits you have been attempting to make to the article about your father. I want to preface this by saying that I attended the University of Illinois 1974-1978, used the Plato system extensively, and I believe I had some slight interactions with your father on the Plato system, although I don't think we ever met in person. Now, I would hate to see you get blocked or sanctioned for your sincere attempts to improve the article about your father, so I want to try to explain what's happening. Wikipedia has certain guidelines and policies about what information can be included here. Perhaps counterintuitively, the truth of the information is not really relevant. What matters is that the information is reported in WP:Reliable sources, and that it can be verified by other editors. I hope you can see that adding information that is only known to you and your family clearly cannot be verified by other editors, so that cannot be included here. I understand that this can be frustrating; I myself had to leave an article with a statement I knew to be false from personal knowledge, for several years until a reliable source could be found. But I'm sure you can see that if Wikipedia allowed anyone to add any information that they claimed to know from personal knowledge, there would be no way to stop misleading, erroneous or plainly fabricated information from being added. I would encourage you to read the WP:Verifiability policy to further understand this. You will note that at the top of that article it says "This page documents a Wikipedia policy". There are only a handful of articles that say that; it means that this is a core foundational principle on which Wikipedia operates, unlike other "guidelines" or "essays" that you may see here which are less strictly adhered to. I hope this helps, and I hope you will continue to contribute to Wikipedia. CodeTalker (talk) 04:29, 18 November 2020 (UTC)


 * Telling me that wikipedia's corrupt and foolish policies cause my article to be in violation of their corrupt and foolish policies is just corrupt and foolish. SystemBuilder (talk) 05:47, 1 June 2022 (UTC)

Invitation to Local Wikimania Event in San Francisco this Friday
Hi!

Wikimania is happening and hopefully you're enjoying the sessions. While it's fairly last minute, you're warmly invited to participate in the local Wikimania-themed meetup in the Wikimedia Foundation office this Friday (tomorrow!). You will have to register in advance, but we would love to see more people from the WikiSalon community participate! For more information and registration, please check out Wikimania 2022/San Francisco Meetup.

The event will involve hacking, teaching, learning, and celebrating and we'll have snacks. We will have the opportunity to watch live sessions at Wikimania together in the afternoon. The rest of the day we'll have opportunity to participate in the hackathon, and we may have some on-demand workshops/learning sessions.

In case we run out of space, it's first-come-first-serve so let us know soon! Hope to see you there.

(Subscribe/Unsubscribe to this talk page notice here)

On behalf of the Bay Area Wiki Salon team and Bittakea, Effeietsanders

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 28 November 2023 (UTC)