User talk:Tchan24601

This user is a student editor in Cornell_University/NS1150_Health,_Health,_and_Society_(Spring_2018) .

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Tchan24601, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Ian and I work with the Wiki Education Foundation; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.

I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing.

Handouts
Choosing an article to edit Editing an article • Add images to articles Citing sources on Wikipedia
Additional Resources
You can find answers to many student questions on our Q&A site, ask.wikiedu.org

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Ian (Wiki Ed) (talk) 16:34, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

NS1150 article selection[edit]

Hi Tchan24601, I am going to assign you to edit the article on Rousong. I am curious as to what you want to add to this article! Let me know if you have questions or would like to discuss other article options. Saguaromelee (talk) 15:45, 26 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback for annotated bibliography[edit]

You have a nice start on your research but you will need to expand your summary of the findings of your sources and analyze the strengths and weaknesses of your evidence and how that contributes to your controversy. You may also want to look for a review, systematic review or meta-analysis (using the article type filters in Pubmed). Camand74 (talk) 19:00, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Good job on realizing there was no particular controversy around rousong and broadening to processed meats and controversies around that! Sometimes that will be the case and you'll have to reframe the issue. Also note that when evaluating articles, a lack of definitive conclusion is not necessarily a weakness (sometimes studies are inconclusive but that is a useful addition to the knowledge base as well) and an article can come to a conclusion but needs to consider the evidence evenhandedly. Camand74 (talk) 16:35, 8 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]