User talk:Tedperl

March 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Ushahidi has been reverted.

Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove unwanted links and spam from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. The external links I reverted were matching the following regex rule(s): \bwordpress\.com (links: http://irevolution.wordpress.com/2009/02/27/huridocs09-from-wikipedia-to-ushahidi/huridocs09:).

If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 15:58, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

Arizona SB1070 and importance of Krenz
Hi, I contributed to the Arizona SB1070 article recently, in the edit summary you questioned the role of Robert Krenz. I just wanted to point out that Mr. Krenz demise was responsible for the legislation, Sen. McCain mentioned him and cited his example in support of the law. If you would google(news) Mr. Krenz name you will encounter hundreds of articles related to the law that mention him, I can provide links to several if you need sources. I agree that nationally it might not be as relevant, but in Arizona it was an important incident. Thank you.--Theo10011 (talk) 13:57, 25 April 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Arizona SB1070
Thanks from me and the wiki Victuallers (talk) 00:02, 30 April 2010 (UTC)

2012 Benghazi attack
A discussion has begun in order to gain a consensus on whether to include or exclude material involving the CIA and weapons smuggling in the article. Please weigh in on the discussion at the talk page. This may also be a good time to reassess the rating on the article. Thank you.--Maleko Mela (talk) 22:12, 2 May 2014 (UTC)