User talk:Texttramp

Greetings
I note that you added yourself as a participant in Wikiproject Nudity. I seem to have been the only active member for some time, and would like to determine your level of interest. My participation in WP is the opposite from the one you state; rather than copy-editing I have been adding content based upon research into topics that interest me. In the past few months, the topic has been nudity, which I approach both as a social scientist and visual artist. As with any other writer, I value the need for other eyes, particularly regarding grammar/syntax. Any assistance will be appreciated. --WriterArtistDC (talk) 22:11, 24 January 2021 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the comment. I do plan to add to existing articles and possibly compose new ones where useful. I'm still learning, so my contributions will grow as I see where I can add useful info. So far I've added the Wikiproject banner to a few relevant pages--trying to rope in more articles that seem to be within it's scope. As I gain a sense of the breadth of the subject area, I plan to do more in-depth work on articles. Look forward to working with you and everyone else in the project. Texttramp (talk) 23:18, 25 January 2021 (UTC)

Peer review
Just a note to say how much I appreciate the detail and thoughtfulness of your response to my request for feedback on the Nudity article. I will reply in kind soon.--WriterArtistDC (talk) 23:27, 22 March 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 2
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Timeline of social nudity, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Berkeley. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 2 April 2021 (UTC)

Feedback Request
Hi there! I have recently made a request for an assessment of the article Puppetry of the Penis on various WikiProjects. I have been editing this article for over a month, adding almost 3000 words, new sections, an infobox, media and more references for verifiability. I noticed you were a very active (and helpful) editor of WikiProject Nudity, and was wondering if you had the time if you could have a look at the article and provide me any feedback. Any general feedback would be much appreciated and possibly an assessment of the article for importance and quality. Thank you very much. Rubyredgirl (talk) 09:57, 11 June 2021 (UTC)

November 2021
Hello, and thank you for your efforts to improve Wikipedia! However, you should know that it is not a good idea to remove citations or information sourced through citations simply because a link to a source is not working, as you did to Andrew Martinez. Dead links should not be deleted. Instead, please repair or replace the link, if possible, and ensure properly sourced information is retained. Often, a live substitute link can be found. Links not used as references, notes or citations are not as important, such as those listed in the "External links" or "Further reading" sections, but bad links in those sections should also be fixed if possible. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. TJRC (talk) 23:16, 8 November 2021 (UTC)


 * @TJRC - Thank you for pointing this out. I was unaware of this policy but I will follow it from now on. Texttramp (talk) 11:39, 10 November 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:45, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:58, 28 November 2023 (UTC)