User talk:Thanissaro

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~&#126;); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place  on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Notability of Thongsuk Samdaengpan
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Thongsuk Samdaengpan, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Thongsuk Samdaengpan seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Thongsuk Samdaengpan, please affix the template to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that '''this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here''' CSDWarnBot (talk) 23:02, 6 February 2008 (UTC)

What is Editorial Policy on Bad External Links?
If a Wikipedia entry bases its citations on external links which have since become defunct, how should a Wikipedian improve the page in the case
 * that equivalent citation can be linked from another source
 * that no equivalent citation is available
 * The guidelines for what to do when a reference link goes dead are here. Regards, Gr1st (talk) 11:30, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for Magha Puja article!
Hi Thanissaro - just wanted to thank you for creating the Magha Puja article. Good job! Happy Uposatha day! Larry Rosenfeld (talk) 15:13, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Book?
Are you the same Thanissaro who appears as the 3rd author in the 5th edition of Robinson et al, Buddhist Religions? Peter jackson (talk) 11:37, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

Is this really a case of a copyright infringement?
helpme There is a user who persistently removes a link to a news article claiming it is a copyright infringement. The user in question does not discuss changes, but just deletes things, with a comment in the edit summary. The edit in question is this one. Am I missing something? Is this criticism justified? If it is not justified and the user in general continues with this behaviour, is there something that can be done about it? Thanissaro (talk) 21:19, 23 March 2008 (UTC)


 * Links can't be copyright violation. However, in this case, the links that were removed were all spam anyway, so all well and good that they're gone. KTC (talk) 21:27, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Sorry, those weren't spam links. I made a mistake like my ad-blocker because of the word 'advert' in the URL. What were deleted there were links under the references section. That come under Reliable sources. Those images are hosted on a geocities site, which mean it normally wouldn't pass the reliable criteria. However, (some of) it looks like newspaper clippings to me, with me not being able to understand what it say, and hence where it came from, I can't comment whether it constituents reliable sources. (Of course, I'm completely ignoring whether the linked to website are hosting those images legally...) KTC (talk) 03:15, 24 March 2008 (UTC)


 * I presume the bit of the article where you're using those articles as references already provide that summary. Otherwise yes, citing giving the date/newspaper title etc. using Cite news would be the way to go, all assuming the newspaper pass as reliable sources. KTC (talk) 07:36, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

Oxford Wikimania 2010 and Wikimedia UK v2.0 Notice
Hi,

As a regularly contributing UK Wikipedian, we were wondering if you wanted to contribute to the Oxford bid to host the 2010 Wikimania conference. Please see here for details of how to get involved, we need all the help we can get if we are to put in a compelling bid.

We are also in the process of forming a new UK Wikimedia chapter to replace the soon to be folded old one. If you are interested in helping shape our plans, showing your support or becoming a future member or board member, please head over to the Wikimedia UK v2.0 page and let us know. We plan on holding an election in the next month to find the initial board, who will oversee the process of founding the company and accepting membership applications. They will then call an AGM to formally elect a new board who after obtaining charitable status will start the fund raising, promotion and active support for the UK Wikimedian community for which the chapter is being founded.

You may also wish to attend the next London meet-up at which both of these issues will be discussed. If you can't attend this meetup, you may want to watch Meetup, for updates on future meets.

We look forward to hearing from you soon, and we send our apologies for this automated intrusion onto your talk page!

Addbot (talk) 07:38, 31 August 2008 (UTC)

The role of faith (saddha) in Buddhism?
The article on the Kalama sutta has a sub-section, "Faith in the Kalama Sutta", which has changed quite a bit over time. I've heard this debate outside of Wikipedia and since you're an expert, I'd like your opinion for the article.

It might also be good to take a look at Faith in Buddhism. &#9775; Zenwhat (talk) 03:05, 6 July 2009 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Gongtham.jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Gongtham.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. -- Skier Dude ( talk ) 06:41, 2 October 2009 (UTC)

suggestion
Hello! I noticed you contributed to Middlesex University entry on Wikipedia. If you studied at that University, please consider including this userbox on your userpage. Simply paste  to your userpage. Thank you. Invest in knowledge (talk) 18:09, 17 June 2011 (UTC)

A kitten for you!
Thanks for making wonderful articles!

Binko71100 (talk) 03:41, 29 January 2013 (UTC) 

Proposed deletion of Dhammakaya Open University


The article Dhammakaya Open University has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * No indication that this unaccredeted institution meets Wikipedia notability guidelines. No third-party sourcing whatsoever. Nothing but an advertisement.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. AndyTheGrump (talk) 20:21, 7 August 2014 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Dhammapasala.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Dhammapasala.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as non-free fair use or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 17:36, 2 June 2016 (UTC)

Merger discussion for Thongsuk Samdaengpan
An article that you have been involved in editing&mdash;Thongsuk Samdaengpan&mdash;has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. S Khemadhammo (talk) 14:12, 17 September 2016 (UTC)

Merger discussion for Luang Por Dhammajayo and Luang Por Dattajivo
Articles that you have been involved in editing&mdash;Luang Por Dhammajayo and Luang Por Dattajivo&mdash;have been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. S Khemadhammo (talk) 14:18, 17 September 2016 (UTC)

—S Khemadhammo (talk) 14:18, 17 September 2016 (UTC)

Possible removal of AWB access due to inactivity
Hello! There is currently a request for approval of a bot to manage the AutoWikiBrowser CheckPage by removing inactive users, among other tasks. You are being contacted because you may qualify as an inactive user of AWB. First, if you have any input on the proposed bot task, please feel free to comment at the BRFA. Should the bot task be approved, your access to AWB may be uncontroversially removed if you do not resume editing within a week's time. This is purely for routine maintenance of the CheckPage, and is not indicative of wrongdoing on your part. You will be able regain access at any time by simply requesting it at WP:PERM/AWB. Thank you! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:36, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Dhammakaya
Template:Dhammakaya has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Zackmann08 (Talk to me/What I been doing) 16:48, 17 October 2017 (UTC)

DYK for Chandra Khonnokyoong
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:03, 8 March 2018 (UTC)

DYK for Luang Por Dattajivo
Gatoclass (talk) 00:02, 24 June 2018 (UTC)

Discussion about Dhammakaya Movement
You might want to weigh in this discussion about the Dhammakaya Movement. Thanks.-- Farang Rak Tham   (Talk) 21:23, 7 December 2018 (UTC)

DYK for Magha Puja
--valereee (talk) 00:01, 3 December 2019 (UTC)