User talk:Thanos5150

I've been frequenting pages over the last several weeks that you frequently edit and must say a big thank you for fighting the good fight in the more controversial areas of ancient history and the like. For a long time now I've known that the only way to get an overall view on any controversial topic or person is on Wikipedia is to go straight to the subject's "Talk" page after reading the main article, because it's pretty clear that the pseudosceptics are in complete control of all controversial subjects on Wikipedia. I've often been astonished at the lengths some will go to protect the orthodox view by completely discrediting alternate views, often without foundation and using sources that would be considered dubious if used to discredit orthodox views. I've been reading over discussions on various talk pages going back several years and your commitment to balance is very much appreciated. Keep up the good work! Johnnyc (talk) 16:47, 13 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the acknowledgement Johnnyc.Thanos5150 (talk) 01:59, 26 January 2012 (UTC)

Article Utsurobune
Hi! It's me, the main editor of besaid article. Yes, I scndalously removed the "citation needed"-mark.^^ All sources listet at the end of the chapter cover ANY sentence written there. ;o) Regards;--Nephiliskos (talk) 00:05, 30 December 2013 (UTC) PS: Please answer at my discussion page - you are always invited! But I depend on the new-message-herold, otherwise I gonna miss your answers.

Article Great_Pyramid_of_Giza
Hey, I found a piece of text that got cut off. It goes:

"Recent further excavations of the town and a newly discovered harbor"

It was added here: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Great_Pyramid_of_Giza&diff=594902238&oldid=594898652

ThijsDeschildre (talk) 08:52, 1 March 2014 (UTC)

Biden–Ukraine conspiracy theory
Hi Thanos5150, I've just reverted your edit to Biden–Ukraine conspiracy theory, and wanted to let you know why in case you haven't seen my edit summary. Neither Newsweek nor National Review (the original sources of the MSN & Yahoo articles you cited) are considered reliable for contentious claims related to US politics per WP:RSP. There are currently extensive discussions going on at the article's talk page, and I'd appreciate it if you could offer your input there so we can build a consensus for what should or shouldn't be included. Best regards, Jr8825  •  Talk  03:09, 22 October 2020 (UTC)

New message from Jr8825
Jr8825 •  Talk  05:08, 22 October 2020 (UTC)

Signing messages
Hi Thanos, just a reminder that you should sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes ( ~ ), this way a script will automatically add your details. I noticed you were trying to sign manually, which is more effort and doesn't leave a timestamp. I've retroactively added the timestamps to your messages at the Talk:Biden–Ukraine conspiracy theory for you. Cheers, Jr8825  •  Talk  16:11, 22 October 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:23, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 28 November 2023 (UTC)