User talk:The1337gamer/Archive 6

AO Tennis‎‎
What are you doing?. Why are you so mean to me. I did what you said, and again you added notability, to my page. Tell me what is now wrong with my page. Why did you again add notability. Why????. Please, I really want to know what I do wrong. --thomediter (talk) 17:57, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Firstly, I wouldn't consider removing inappropriate constant and adding a notability tag to an article as being mean. Secondly, the tag itself explains why it's there, so read it. And also read WP:NOTABILITY. All the sources I've found just mention the game is coming out. There is no preview coverage, or much information on its development/gameplay. Therefore, it probably shouldn't be an article until there is more significant coverage from reliable, secondary sources, like critic reviews. --The1337gamer (talk) 10:19, 7 January 2018 (UTC)

Halo Recruit listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Halo Recruit. Since you had some involvement with the Halo Recruit redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. ZXCVBNM (TALK) 15:24, 22 January 2018 (UTC)

Halo: Recruit listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Halo: Recruit. Since you had some involvement with the Halo: Recruit redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. ZXCVBNM (TALK) 15:27, 22 January 2018 (UTC)

Retro Gamer #91
Hi, would it be possible for you to provide me with scans of "The Making of Sonic Adventure" from Retro Gamer #91? JOE BRO  64  14:56, 27 January 2018 (UTC)
 * I can however the issue at my parents house and I won't be visiting there until the end of February. So you'd have to wait about a month. You could ask on the WikiProject talk page if anyone else has a copy. There are other editors who collect and read Retro Gamer. --The1337gamer (talk) 16:44, 27 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Thanks for replying quickly. If I'm not able to find a scan I'll just let you know. JOE BRO  64  22:19, 27 January 2018 (UTC)

I have unreviewed a page you curated
Hi, I'm PRehse. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Monster Hunter Freedom Unite, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.

PRehse (talk) 18:42, 9 February 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:The stranglers the collection.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:The stranglers the collection.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:23, 21 February 2018 (UTC)

Angry birds / kirby IP
Range blocked 1 year. Didn't realize it was the same guy as before at first. -- ferret (talk) 21:51, 22 February 2018 (UTC)

Mount & Blade 2: bannerlord
Hello there, i edited/added the ps4 and xbox platforms because several sites around the internet claims that the game will launch on consoles so based on these statements i added the plaforms in which the game will launch. ZenIceHero (talk) 06:52, 28 February 2018 (UTC)

Ubisoft Montpellier/Red Storm
No need to commentlessly revert the redirect twice. As pointed out, both articles carry just about no sources, and as such fail WP:GNG (keep in mind that notability is not WP:INHERITed). Both articles can be recreated if enough sources are found, but should be because sources can be found. Lordtobi ( &#9993; ) 19:25, 12 March 2018 (UTC)
 * WP:BRD. You blanked an article without explanation. I reverted. You do not blanked it gain. You discuss. Stop making shit changes. I'll find sources if you're too lazy to bother. --The1337gamer (talk) 19:27, 12 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Bad day? Please don't let off your steam onto other editors, thanks. I also don't see the point in massively restoring WikiProject templates that state the redirects are Start-class articles. Lordtobi  ( &#9993; ) 19:29, 12 March 2018 (UTC)
 * You've been around long enough to understand how things should work. Yet I still see you frequently edit warring and acting ineptly. I can give you a bunch of reasons why not to redirect those talk pages but I'm not going to waste my time. --The1337gamer (talk) 19:33, 12 March 2018 (UTC)

Collaborating on Halo
Hey The1337gamer, you seem to be willing to rescue the first Halo's Wikipedia entry from the FAR situation that's been brewing lately. I'd like to lend my hand for this effort, but in my view the first order of business will be to assemble a credible information base to beef up the article's Development section, which seems substandard to me. I think it is important to obtain scans of an article from Electronic Gaming Monthly's Issue 151 (February 2002) titled "Afterthoughts – Halo", which explains the rationale behind some of the more fundamental revisions made to the game during its development. However, neither this particular issue nor the feature seem to be available in electronic form, as do many of EGM's issues from the early 2000s. I wonder if you happened to come across this article or know some way to access it in the short run? I would be much obliged to be able to count on your support. Electroguv (talk) 12:12, 17 March 2018 (UTC)

I have unreviewed a page you curated
Hi, I'm Anaxial. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Kathy Rain, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.

Anaxial (talk) 20:52, 27 March 2018 (UTC)

Notability of The Sims 4 Game Packs
Hi The1337gamer, I noticed you've tagged The Sims 4: Jungle Adventure as questionable notability. I was curious as to whether or not this is applicable to other expansion packs for the game that have their own articles. I've been focused on editing The Sims articles recently because the franchise is very near to my heart, so I would appreciate other viewpoints as to the notability of these specific expansion pack articles. I'm also more than happy to continue working on articles such as this and others that are lacking citations, as I have been able to find more sources other than what is already featured on the article. Thank you, Nanophosis (talk) 17:40, 1 April 2018 (UTC)
 * I have similar issues with the other Sims 4 articles. These articles are very short and there is no coverage from reliable sources on the development and design of these expansions. Reception/review coverage is minimal as well. I think merging them to one article would be more appropriate than having 10 separate articles. An article titled something like The Sims 4 expansion packs or The Sims 4 downloadable content that covers all of the content from these expansion articles would work.--The1337gamer (talk) 18:18, 1 April 2018 (UTC)

APRIL FOOLS
2601:647:101:D030:BC0D:DB84:C4CF:C9F4 (talk) 20:40, 1 April 2018 (UTC)

TFL notification
Hi, The1337gamer. I'm just posting to let you know that List of BioWare video games – a list that you have been heavily involved with – has been chosen to appear on the Main Page as Today's featured list for April 30. The TFL blurb can be seen here. If you have any thoughts on the selection, please post them on my talk page or at TFL talk. Regards, Giants2008  ( Talk ) 23:19, 9 April 2018 (UTC)

List of artists who have portrayed themselves in music games
Hi, have deprodded this to merge into the List of celebrity appearances in video games. That list is currently unreferenced so I will try to add a reference for every entry. User:PMC said to go ahead with the merge as it has been proposed since 2017 but am a bit busy so will hope to start it and add refs within the next two weeks, thanks Atlantic306 (talk) 10:39, 11 April 2018 (UTC)

Edge Magazine no. 240 May 2012
Know how to get ahold of this? According to the cover, it contains something on Quantic Dream, which I wanna rewrite. The studio profile you suggested contributed a lot to Dontnod Entertainment. I'm just grasping at straws for something like that to improve Quantic Dream's article. Cognissonance (talk) 17:08, 5 May 2018 (UTC)
 * I don't have this issue of Edge and I don't think it has a detailed Studio Profile feature like the one on Dontnod in #293. It does have an interview with David Cage though. Edge republished the interview from #240 on their website. Here's a link: . If you're looking for other print sources, then I know that GamesTM #194 released this year had a feature on Detroit with David Cage and Quantic Dream. --The1337gamer (talk) 18:07, 5 May 2018 (UTC)
 * I found this in Games TM, p. 30: "the rate at which human intelligence develops pales in comparison to that of a machine". I wrote that in Detroit: Become Human's development section. Nice, they borrowed from me. Cognissonance (talk) 20:08, 5 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Wow ye, just checked it myself. Word for word copy there. I've noticed this a few times with some of my work on Wikipedia. Writers for video game websites or YouTubers copying stuff almost exactly from Wikipedia articles that I edited. I feel like a handful of WP:VG's most dedicated editors are better content writers than the majority of the video game press anyway and we do it for free. --The1337gamer (talk) 20:26, 5 May 2018 (UTC)
 * I've noticed the same on multiple occasions, like Metro Times quoting me instead of David Cage: "to revitalize a city that had succumbed to economic decline after having made a historical contribution to American industry". All they did was change the s to a z! Cognissonance (talk) 20:51, 5 May 2018 (UTC)

About DS Bosses list
Do I need to restrict the list to bosses important to the plot, or do I add NPCs? Or is it because it isn't finished? VolseniMack (talk) 18:55, 15 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Lists of bosses, NPCs, weapons, enemies, etc don't belong on Wikipedia. #6 and #7 at WP:GAMECRUFT cover this. --The1337gamer (talk) 19:02, 15 May 2018 (UTC)
 * I just thought "Hey, since there are already lists of video game characters, why not make this list?". And I know about the part on "no boss lists on Wikipedia"(at least now I do). I would assume that the bosses within the Souls games have more significance than the main characters and are one of the important parts of the series gameplay-wise. VolseniMack (talk) 18:29, 18 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Most lists of video game characters are really poor quality and shouldn't exist. It's just that a lot of them are old and nobody has bothered to deal with them. We have actually redirected/deleted a bunch of them in recent years. We should only write about video game characters that have real world significance and not focus too much on the in-universe perspective. Dark Souls bosses, while they are a significant component of the games, they are not really subject to coverage outside of that fictional universe. A boss list also runs the risk of being written too much like a game guide since the player's interaction with the characters is simply fighting them, and Wikipedia is not a game guide. Content like this is better for a Dark Souls wiki rather than Wikipedia. --The1337gamer (talk) 18:45, 18 May 2018 (UTC)

How does leaving a link to either the Dark Souls wiki or Fextralife as a "for more information" sort of thing? VolseniMack (talk) 19:05, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Video game guideline on external links is here: WP:VG/EL. Open wikis are usually a no. But it says that if the link has substantial information that is relevant but not necessarily encyclopedic in nature, like a dedicated wiki, then it may be added on a case-by-case basis. So you're best off making a topic on the talk page of the article you want to add the link on to see if other editors think it is appropriate or not. --The1337gamer (talk) 19:27, 24 May 2018 (UTC)

Kneejerk idiocy
Dude, at least do us the basic human courtesy of checking our edits before you hit the revert button. Other people are trying to improve articles too. Thank you. Equinox ◑ 03:18, 27 May 2018 (UTC)

Regarding “Windows” on Sea of Thieves
Regarding, when Microsoft Windows is first mentioned in any article, it goes by its full name, Microsoft Windows. The article is called “Microsoft Windows” and it is the name of the family of operating systems. Other articles, including articles about video games, use the full name of the operating system in the article body and infobox, and so does one of the examples in the template documentation for the infobox (look at the examples of the platform parameter. This is partly so that that it is not ambiguous. Inter qwark talk  contribs 17:22, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Plenty of video game articles just use "Windows". It is obviously not ambiguous in the context of a video game. Saying "Microsoft Windows" is just plain clumsy. Video game and tech sources almost never state "Microsoft Windows", therefore why should we? It's like writing "Microsoft Xbox 360" or "Sony PlayStation 4" etc. for every single platform. You don't see that on video game articles. The only reason people write "Microsoft Windows" is because the article is located at that title and people have some weird subconscious problem with using perfectly fine redirects (like Windows) instead of the actual page title, even when it is better to use the redirect. --The1337gamer (talk) 17:28, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
 * There is no problem with using redirect links (per MOS:NOPIPE and WP:NOTBROKEN), but in this case, we’re debating whether the infobox should say “Windows” or “Microsoft Windows.” As I said, other articles use the latter, and that is the name of the page and the operating system.


 * Perhaps we could use some help from another, experienced editor.
 * Help me


 * By the way, I reverted you because, in this case, I wasn’t looking for consensus but rather reverting your incorrect revision, but we might want to reach a consensus since we both disagree. Inter qwark talk  contribs 17:40, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Thel337gamer is one of our most experienced editors in the video game area. It would do you well to heed his statements. -- ferret (talk) 17:44, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Understood. I was confused since every other video game article I’ve come across uses “Microsoft Windows” rather than simply “Windows,” both in the article bodies and infoboxes. Inter qwark talk  contribs 17:45, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Should every article listing Windows as one of the platforms simply use the name (and link) “Windows” instead of “Microsoft Windows”? Inter qwark talk  contribs 18:26, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
 * MOS:VG has no specific guidance on this, but it strikes me as a bit like the current discussion about whether to include video game in the lead. The argument "Everyone knows that a first person shooter is a video game" could just as easily be argued that "Everyone knows what Windows is when talking about video games". If you want a strong consensus I would pose it as a question on MOS:VG's talk page. -- ferret (talk) 18:38, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
 * I agree. Everybody does know what Windows is. Windows isn’t just related to video games, though, so I’m not sure if MOS:VG is the appropriate talk page to post a discussion like that on. Inter qwark talk  contribs 18:54, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
 * It's use in video games is appropriate for MOS:VG. If people disagree the discussion could move to MOS:COMPUTING. -- ferret (talk) 18:56, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Okay. I’ve started a discussion on Talk:MOS:VG. Inter qwark talk  contribs 19:01, 1 June 2018 (UTC)

It is better to provide a listed overview of the included games?
About Street Fighter 30th Anniversary Collection: A list, in this case, works much better for readers to interpret the information. See Manual_of_Style/Embedded_lists, specifically WP:LONGSEQ. --Agilo (talk) 12:14, 6 June 2018 (UTC)

FYI
Administrators'_noticeboard/Edit_warring. Black Kite (talk) 21:40, 10 June 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 13
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Batman: White Knight, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Trade paperback ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Batman:_White_Knight check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Batman:_White_Knight?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:19, 13 June 2018 (UTC)

File:WarioWare Gold Cover.jpg
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:09, 13 June 2018 (UTC)

Your revert on Fallout (series)
Hi. Regarding on Fallout (series), the article was initially written in British English (although using the MDY date format); I went back and checked. I’m not sure if MOS:TIES counts video game series; it only mentions nations and modern writers. However, if a video game series does count, it should use American English. I suppose it could count since the video games are basted in America, but I’m unsure about that.

You also reverted my other edits. For instance, I also reverted a revision by where he or shes moved the “Fallout New Vegas (2010” revision to the “Spin-off games” section. Even though it might take more time, I think it would be better to undo the edits that you need to undo manually instead of reverting entire revisions that have other valid, unrelated edits. No worries, though: . Inter qwark  talk  contribs 22:17, 19 June 2018 (UTC)
 * If you don't want large complicated edits reverted in total, don't make them. Use smaller edits to do individual edits at a time, not 4 unrelated changes together. No one else is obligated to pick apart your large edits to fix one. New Vegas is a spin off, and I added sourcing supporting that after the IP moved it. -- ferret (talk) 22:22, 19 June 2018 (UTC)
 * I like to do more in single revisions since it’s less tedious to browse the revisions that way, but I understand what you mean. I have no problem with undoing edits manually, but of course, it’s more tedious to do so.
 * I didn’t know that New Vegas was considered a spin-off now. I’m sorry that I moved the section again. I’ve added this information to the Fallout: New Vegas article. Inter qwark talk  contribs 22:27, 19 June 2018 (UTC)


 * It is completely irrelevant what the article was written in originally. WP:RETAIN says to retain the existing variety that has been established in the article. A revision from ~15 years ago is not established. The existing variety is obviously American English because that is what the article has almost if not entirely been written in for at least several years now. That is established. No valid reason for change. --The1337gamer (talk) 23:07, 19 June 2018 (UTC)
 * I understand. . Inter qwark talk  contribs 23:32, 19 June 2018 (UTC)

Wasteland (series)
Why did you turn it into a redirect after it reviewed and without discussing it with anyone? Shouldn't there have been an AfD opened? ShimonChai (talk) 23:18, 24 June 2018 (UTC)

Do you want to be an admin?
Since you really helped catch sock puppets and worked hard to clean up Wikipedia, maybe become an admin and a checkuser! I think you really have the qualifications! Maybe I’ll nominate you at WP:RFA The2002 bmw (talk) 09:13, 7 July 2018 (UTC)

Halo Silentium
Yeah.....i wrote some nonsence about a character in the book cause i hadnt done enough research and most of my edit was utter bullshit and actually i was about to delete it miself when but then i saw you had already done this. But i gotta ask why there is no information about Dawn-over-Fields in the page about halo silentium. This character is there but the page doesnt mention him at all. You could have left the part of my edit mentioning his existence and only deleted the bullshit about the autor. MajorMihov (talk) 09:16, 14 July 2018 (UTC)

Knack 2 revert
Why did you revert so many Knack 2 edits when most are literally adding true content? Knack 5 appreciator (talk) 09:29, 14 July 2018 (UTC)

What is your problem?
Why are you following all my edits and immediately reverting them? You’re also just putting warning templates on my talk page without actually discussing anything. Please leave me alone. You do not own those articles. Reedetch (talk) 15:06, 14 July 2018 (UTC)


 * Uh, the warning template tells you what the problem is. You aren't using reliable secondary sources. On top of that, your response was to go into the1137gamer's edits and "revenge revert" to restore other unsourced content that he had validly removed, including a spam link he reverted. If you continue disruptively editing in this way you will be blocked. -- ferret (talk) 16:06, 14 July 2018 (UTC)


 * To be fair, both sides hold some responsibility. It's important to remember WP:OWN. "No one, no matter how skilled, or how high-standing in the community, has the right to act as though they are the owner of a particular page." It is worth a read, thanks! Editorguy117 (talk) 21:16, 22 July 2018 (UTC)


 * Your view on this topic is naive, ignorant and incorrect. Reedetch is a vandal and has been blocked indefinitely. I hold no blame or responsibility for doing anything wrong here. I correctly reverted their vandalism and correctly warned them. They were blocked because of CheckUser evidence, which means they are a sockpuppet/previous vandal. Reedetch only posted this topic on my talk page because they are an idiot troll looking to waste my time and start an argument with me. It is typical behaviour for a troll to immediately go on the offensive when they've been reverted; genuine new users don't do that. I suspected they were a sockpuppet based on their edits and responses so I deliberately ignored them because that means the troll doesn't win. If trolls are reverted, ignored and blocked then they have accomplished nothing. --The1337gamer (talk) 17:17, 23 July 2018 (UTC)


 * I was under the impression that they were a normal user, and it was an opinion dispute. Seeing as they are a confirmed vandal that is another story. Nevermind thenEditorguy117 (talk) 21:58, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Calling an editor an "idiot troll" is a personal attack. Please don't insult others. JOE BRO  64  18:44, 25 July 2018 (UTC)

About Halo 2 comparison.jpg
Hi The1337gamer, thanks for uploading a comparison of the old and modern graphics of Halo 2 Anniversary. Would you mind if I replaced this image with a better comparison? The current image is low fidelity and doesn't quite show off the quality of the graphical upgrade. I plan to take a better graphical comparison myself to do the game justice, is that alright? Thanks Editorguy117 (talk) 21:10, 22 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Don't care. --The1337gamer (talk) 17:18, 23 July 2018 (UTC)


 * Done, as agreed upon. It looks way better now, thanks Editorguy117 (talk) 23:03, 6 November 2018 (UTC)

"Avoid using smaller font sizes in elements that already use a smaller font size, such as infoboxes, navboxes and reference sections."
Must be outdated or something, because the whole problem i have with it is the font size is of normal size. SNAAAAKE!! (talk) 13:06, 29 July 2018 (UTC)
 * If it's a problem, then why are the +4 million other articles on Wikipedia with reference lists using normal size font? 🤔 You should raise this issue at Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style if you actually want a consensus to change it across the encyclopedia. --The1337gamer (talk) 13:10, 29 July 2018 (UTC)

And as I said, nobody's even going to go there, because it's a computer website and so a ref window pop-ups. (Not that 99.9% will even check any reference reading an article, you know. But let's pretend people do check references.) Also since it's a computer website, font size can be regulated by user in any case at any moment, with no loss of quality, if there's a rare person that enjoys to read references sections.

I have no problem if the references are few. Actually I take "less than 100" as "few" lol. SNAAAAKE!! (talk) 13:30, 29 July 2018 (UTC)

Also if you visual edit the refs actually are quite nice and small. But not when reading. So it's only fixing it at it should be. --SNAAAAKE!! (talk) 13:41, 29 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Your changes introduce WP:Linter errors. It sounds like there is something broken on your side, not out side, as references should appear at 90% already. --Izno (talk) 14:38, 29 July 2018 (UTC)

Date LTA
Issued a 6 month block on the /64 for that date vandal. Previous 1 month block ended apparently. -- ferret (talk) 21:44, 1 August 2018 (UTC)

Mystery Case Files: Escape From Ravenhearst
Dear The1337gamer, I´ve seen that you have reverted my edits on the article Mystery Case Files: Escape From Ravenhearst. I cannot understand this action, because the only thing that based on the IMDB source were the names of the actors. So it wouldn´t have been necessary to revert the whole article. If you agree I will make a screenshot of the credit scenes from the game where the actors are also mentioned and will integrate it into the article. An answer would be very kind. Sincerly --Chrom Toaster (talk) 19:39, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Sourcing was terrible. Notability was not established. Read WP:GNG. --The1337gamer (talk) 20:35, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Now I am confused. I can understand you concerns about IMDB, but if the sourcing in general was terrible and the notability was not established I think the articles Mystery Case Files: Ravenhearst and Mystery Case Files: Return to Ravenhearst should also be reverted to redirection links. They are sourced and written the same way. If these both articles are not reverted I can't understand the deletion of Escape From Ravenhearst. Sincerly--Chrom Toaster (talk) 13:41, 11 September 2018 (UTC)
 * What's confusing exactly? Do you think I alone have time to view all 5.7 million articles on Wikipedia and judge if notability has been established? At a glance, those two articles also looks like they fail notability and should probably redirected if they can't be improved to a sufficient standard. Obviously I haven't looked at those articles because I have other things to do in life, otherwise I would have decided to redirect them. --The1337gamer (talk) 16:51, 11 September 2018 (UTC)

Cover Art for Video Game Titles
You are distorting the public's understanding of release chronology with misleading solid black ESRB letters. --David Ross Garrett (talk) 18:51, 11 September 2018 (UTC)
 * That's an absurd argument. The public has no understanding of any sort of chronology when we only allow a single cover, nor is the exact year of a cover or ESRB labels of any significance. -- ferret (talk) 19:07, 11 September 2018 (UTC)
 * A white ESRB letter signifies a pre-Y2K release. Whatever signifies date of release is significant as many people view these articles to get a feel for a palpable zeitgeist. --David Ross Garrett (talk) 19:23, 11 September 2018 (UTC)

Rayquaza Revert
Dear The1337gamer, it seems that you have reverted my edit on the Rayquaza article. Could you please elaborate on which sources you thought were unreliable, and why? Thanks, TheTiksiBranch (talk) 21:50, 11 September 2018 (UTC) Read WP:RS. I'd suggest using sources that have been vetted and listed as reliable at WP:VG/RS. --
 * Bulbapedia is a user generated wiki. Anybody can edit it. It is therefore unreliable per WP:USERG.
 * Same rationale for Smogon. It's a user generated and unreliable.
 * Random people on Twitter (e.g. PokemonLegality) are unreliable sources.
 * GameRant listed as unreliable at WP:VG/RS after consensus.
 * LoadingXP and Twifinite both look like amateurish blogs. Avoid them.

The1337gamer (talk) 22:00, 11 September 2018 (UTC) Thank you for the aid, i will use WP:VG/RS and fix those. After reading WP:RS, though I do disagree with including Smogon as unreliable due to:

Content from a collaboratively created website may be acceptable if the content was authored by, and is credited to, credentialed members of the site's editorial staff.

Smogon analyses and articles are primarily written by the site's contributor 'badgeholders', and cannot be approved/published without undergoing quality control from consistent, site-accredited qc teams. These contributors (and, usually, qc teams) are individually credited. I guess "credentialed" is a bit of a nebulous concept re: competitive Pokemon, but I can point to the in-site and Nintendo VGC tournament performances etc. of these members. (If I shouldn't be seeking this consensus here and need to go somewhere broader, I will, but if possible I'd prefer to do it here so I can get back to the article). Thanks, TheTiksiBranch (talk) 22:11, 11 September 2018 (UTC)

E: In the meantime, I re-added most of the changes that were reverted, but without any unreliable links. The added links now are to Kotaku, the official Pokemon website from Nintendo/TPCI, and Hardcore Gamer (in WP:RS) TheTiksiBranch (talk) 02:37, 12 September 2018 (UTC)

Edits reverted
You had reverted some of my edits to rhythm games such as this week's Rock Band DLC and the Michael Jackson: The Experience release date. Why? 51.171.179.183 (talk) 22:37, 22 September 2018 (UTC)

Halo Wars 2
Hey mate, looking over the article I think it's in a decent place to get worked into shape for WP:FAC. What do you think? Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs (talk) 13:28, 23 September 2018 (UTC)
 * What do you think needs to be improved to get it to FA-status? I haven't looked over the article much since I got it to GA, but I can spare some time to work on it again. --The1337gamer (talk) 14:09, 23 September 2018 (UTC)
 * I'm gonna' give it a prose look over and double-check sourcing. One organizational thing I wanted to run by you is collating the marketing/sales/release stuff under a single heading. I'm a fan of directly citing reviewers in the prose, but I note that at more recent FAC's that's been discouraged, so reworking the reception might be in order. Could try for more opinions at a PR. Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs (talk) 17:59, 23 September 2018 (UTC)
 * I've combined marketing, release and post-release info under one heading. I don't the think reception section has any direct quotes currently. I'll open a peer review and look at some recent FAs while I check through the article. --The1337gamer (talk) 19:22, 23 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Sorry, what I meant was directly citing the reviewers as in "IGN's John Smith", not in the quotes. Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs (talk) 22:27, 23 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Understood. I've revised the reception section a little and removed the names. --The1337gamer (talk) 20:59, 24 September 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Halo wars 2 cover art.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Halo wars 2 cover art.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:31, 25 September 2018 (UTC)

Ways to improve Dirt Rally 2.0
Hi, I'm Willsome429. The1337gamer, thanks for creating Dirt Rally 2.0!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Thank you for making the page! Make sure to fill in citation fields

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

 Willsome 4 29  (say hey or see my edits!) 13:44, 28 September 2018 (UTC)

I wasn't vandalizing
I was testing the move mechanic but it didn't allow me to move the page back.--GeraltOfRivia2077 (talk) 21:58, 2 October 2018 (UTC)
 * I'm not naive. It's vandalism. You already "tested" the move mechanic with this bullshit move: . Stop it. --The1337gamer (talk) 22:02, 2 October 2018 (UTC)

you are not nice.--GeraltOfRivia2077 (talk) 22:09, 2 October 2018 (UTC)
 * WP:NOTHERE blocked, borderline VOA. -- ferret (talk) 22:12, 2 October 2018 (UTC)

Call of Duty: WWII
Re Call of Duty: WWII can you help educate me? What'd I do wrong? What is the issue with the photo I added? You are absolutely far more knowledgeable about this area than I am so not challenging you at all! Just want to learn... :-) As a side note, that edit of mine came from this discussion which might be great to have you chime in on. -- Zack mann  (Talk to me/What I been doing) 20:14, 6 October 2018 (UTC)
 * 1) WP:VGBOX says "If a suitable English-language cover art already exists on the subject page, then do not waste time replacing it with a different version." There is already a suitable cover art present. It doesn't need to be replaced.
 * 2) WP:IMAGERES says shouldn't be more than 100,000 pixels. The image you uploaded is 562,000 pixels.
 * 3) The image you uploaded isn't even the cover art. It's a phone wallpaper. Compare it to the one that is currently in use on the article, which is the main cover used on retail boxes. The image you uploaded is cropped too closely around the soldier's head and the title text is in a different position. The aspect ratio is odd as well.
 * I don't really understand why you're replacing a suitable image with an unsuitable one. --The1337gamer (talk) 20:21, 6 October 2018 (UTC)

Greninja blank-and-redirect
Was this action discussed anywhere beforehand? From my brief investigation it doesn't seem to comply with WP:BLAR; the article was well-sourced and doesn't seem to fit any deletion criteria. I noticed on Talk:List of generation VI Pokémon there's a section about the creation of the Greninja article, and an administrator gave the OK. Why is it being undone now? — Randomwaffle23 (talk) 18:51, 11 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Reverted and redirected per WP:EVADE. Article creator is a sockpuppet of an indefinitely blocked user. The article is terrible quality anyway. --The1337gamer (talk) 18:54, 11 October 2018 (UTC)
 * See User_talk:Sergecross73. The user is socking. --Izno (talk) 18:56, 11 October 2018 (UTC)
 * That makes sense, thank you for explaining. So, if a legitimate user were to now re-make the article (without all the problems it had), would it be kept? I understand that evading blocks shouldn't be condoned, but there's still good reason to have an article on Greninja. — Randomwaffle23 (talk) 19:19, 11 October 2018 (UTC)

I Too Wasn't Vandalizing
I added a legitimate review of Knack 2 with a valid source from an accredited reviewer and you repeatedly took it down. I do concede that my first posting's presentation was flawed with my calling it "The Only Actual Review," but with my second posting I simply titled it "Other Reviews" opening up the public's understanding of the reception of the game beyond the main stream reviewers while simultaneously inviting others to add other indie reviews to the list, once again to enhance the reader's understanding of the reception of this game. Furthermore, the article is cited as a stub, I was trying to remedy that problem in a small way. By preventing the public from adding details and nuance to the article you're explicitly contradicting the effort to amass a comprehensive, publicly edited, publicly accessible collection of information. There was no reason to take down my edit and in truth by doing so you're actually hurting the community. Torchito (talk) 04:27, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Dunkey is not a accredited reviewer. He's a joker and an entertainer. You're nearly 5 years late to the "Knack is amazing" meme. It isn't funny anymore. Writing this bullshit on my talk page doesn't make you clever or knowledgeable of how Wikipedia works. You're shitposting doesn't belong here so go back to YouTube comment sections. --The1337gamer (talk) 06:36, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Be careful about WP:NPA. JOE BRO  64  10:49, 15 October 2018 (UTC)

Re: Ridley (Metroid) edit
Hi.

I had noticed that you had completely undone my edit on the Ridley (Metroid) page just because I cited a Wikia page. While it's true that Wikia in of itself is not a reliable source, the purpose of that citation was to link to a specific webpage that only provided a collection of photographed animation reference sheets, concept art, and other behind-the-scenes materials that are unfortunately not available elsewhere (to my knowledge). Essentially, the page in question contains minimal "unreliable information" (i.e. content added by the wiki's editor), since it largely consists of the gallery of images straight from the primary source. Unfortunately, directly linking to the image itself (the closest we have to the primary source) would be difficult, since Wikia images sometimes have a nasty tendency to shrink down to a thumbnail when viewed through an external link.

Additionally, I do not believe it was necessary to undo the entire edit, especially since there were other minor fixes made to the article in the same edit. If you were concerned about Wikia specifically, then removing the citation and adding a "citation needed" tag would have sufficed, along with bringing the topic to the talk page for discussion. Perhaps then, the primary source could be more easily identified.

--PeabodySam (talk) 23:02, 16 October 2018 (UTC)
 * The1337gamer's revert is correct, including the entire edit. Some of it's simply unnecessary. Most of it represents WP:OR, as it's your interpretation of primary sources. The Wikia gallery is not a valid source, as we have no way to verify any authenticity of the images and interpreting them is again WP:OR, even ignoring that any use of Wikia is inappropriate as a user generated source. -- ferret (talk) 23:09, 16 October 2018 (UTC)


 * Allow me to review my edit with you:
 * Adding "Mystery Creature", the specific creature's name according to sources such as Metroid: Other M Premiere Edition and Super Smash Bros. for Wii U. This is no less "unnecessary" than specifying the name of "Little Birdie" in the same article, which is already present in the same paragraph.
 * Removal of "Ridley-X" (fan conjecture) and specifying the origins of "Neo Ridley" (Japanese media). This is the most necessary part of the edit, since (as I previously stated) it removes uncited fan conjecture from the article. If anything, I should have added the specific sources for "Neo Ridley" (in particular, Metroid Prime and Fusion Original Soundtracks and Nintendo Official Guide Book for Metroid Fusion).
 * Cutting down on the unnecessarily long description of Ridley's appearance in the Captain N comics, including someone's personal interpretation of his face appearing "more lizard-like".
 * Correcting vague wording ("cartoon series") that could be misinterpreted as the "Ridley impersonating a judge" plotline occurring in the TV series, since the word "cartoon" can also apply to animation.
 * All this is in addition to the aforementioned discussion about behind-the-scenes materials that are publicly available for viewing on this Wikia gallery. Surely, there was a better way to go about this than to just undo the whole thing? --PeabodySam (talk) 23:32, 16 October 2018 (UTC)

Back in Time (iOS app) vs Bobo Explores Light
Hello,

Need your help please.

I've created my first wikipage: Draft:Bobo_Explores_Light and submitted it for review.

Later, I've started my second wikipage: Draft:Back_in_Time_(iOS_App) using the code of my first wikipage as starting point (probably not the best way to do this)

I left my work unfinished and the user: Hastethanwoman (now apparently retired) assumed I've made a mistake and moved (or redirected) my page second page to the first one.

I know that you've tried to revert Hastethanwoman edits

Now both pages showing exactly the same content

Can I undo this mess? could you explain me how.

Thanks in advance, Coel Jo (talk) 11:29, 17 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Hi, I don't think I'm able to fix this. I think an admin will have to clean up the page moves. I'm guessing you want to move Bobo Explores Light back to its original location Draft:Back in Time (iOS App) so that you can continue working on it in draftspace? Then you'll be able to go into the history and change the revision back to what you wanted.
 * Can either of you sort this out? One of Raymondskie99's socks moved another editor's article out draftspace. I think it needs moving back and all the mainspace redirect pages need to be deleted. --The1337gamer (talk) 12:34, 17 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Fixed. -- ferret (talk) 12:42, 17 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Thanks. And yes, this appears to be a trait of Raymond/Haste - my first known interactions with them also involved them moving an unfinished draft of mine into the mainspace. Sergecross73   msg me  21:29, 17 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Thank you guys!
 * Very cool of you to take the time to help a newbie.
 * Coel Jo (talk) 21:54, 17 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Coel Jo (talk) 21:54, 17 October 2018 (UTC)

Neverrainy
I see you warned him before I had a chance to. I do think you shouldn't have cussed at him about it though, even if you were (my guess) properly angry.

Back on topic, what are you going to do if Neverrainy reverts the edits on Universal Interactive games and thinks that he's right about it? I might report him for edit warring as I think he's causing that. Luigitehplumber (talk) 10:29, 27 October 2018 (UTC)

FAC: Forca Bruta
I found an edit of yours for an album article on my watchlist, and have been considering asking someone since the FAC stagnated. Can you offer comments or review? Dan56 (talk) 04:20, 29 October 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Halo 2 comparison.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Halo 2 comparison.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:31, 8 November 2018 (UTC)

Need for Speed Carbon
Hi. Thanks for reviewing my work on this article. Following the guidelines in the Infobox article, I've added some additional text to the article, including a citation to the developer's webpage, which details that they developed this game. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dreamcasher (talk • contribs) 08:06, 14 November 2018 (UTC)

Thanks for helping
Thanks for helping a lot with reverting edits for vandalism. Benjaminkirsc (talk) 11:55, 15 November 2018 (UTC)

Help with a small mess here....
Hey I saw you reported as a sock of  good eye! However while reviewing new pages I have noticed a small mess left behind and not sure what to do here.

So he created the following drafts Draft:Bongo Cat, Draft:Hairy Jack, Draft:Moth Lamp and Draft:Is This a Pigeon?. Instead of moving the drafts to mainspace he just created the same articles in mainspace (Bongo Cat, Hairy Jack, Moth Lamp and Is This a Pigeon?). I'm thinking delete for the Hairy Jack draft and article since no other editors have touched the article and requesting histmerge for the other three drafts into their parent articles here. He also created the articles The Infographics Show, Tukomi and Dark complected man which haven't been edited by others. Based on my knowledge of socks they should just be tagged for detention (besides I don't believe the two YouTube channels would pass WP:GNG anyway.) He also created RP-S512 but one other editor has contributed to this article so it should be fine IMO. What do you think here? Is my understanding of policy and guidance correct in this matter? (Sorry I don't deal with socks that often :/).  ♪♫Al ucard   16♫♪  12:00, 23 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Per WP:EVADE and WP:DENY, any pages he has created that have not had substantial contributions from other editors can be deleted using . If the page has had contributions from editors, then inform them first and judge on a case-by-case basis. I was planning on cleaning up his mess this weekend once he was confirmed a sock but by all means go ahead and sort it out. --The1337gamer (talk) 12:09, 23 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Ah okay so I was on the right track then. I saw you tagged most of them already thanks! I went ahead and grabbed the few redirects he created that were still showing up at NPP before anyone reviewed them.  ♪♫Al ucard   16♫♪  12:40, 23 November 2018 (UTC)

Re:Diablo II citation
Hey. Regarding the Diablo II article listed as "Holiday 2000", there's no way to include the month, because the magazine itself lists "13/2000" as its publication date. It was a special holiday issue, as a lot of European magazines tended to have, published after the December issue. As a result, Holiday 2000 is the only legitimate date for the issue. Is there a way to override the template error? JimmyBlackwing (talk) 16:55, 26 November 2018 (UTC)
 * I know that numerous magazines use "Holiday" or "Christmas" for their 13th issue but that should not be included because it's not valid publication date. Also the month on the front of the magazine is usually not the actual publication date, e.g. Edge #325 December 2018 was released on 16 October 2018. In the citation, we should use 16 October 2018, not December 2018. If the exact publication date or month isn't known, then just the year should be listed. It's useful to check the previous issue for the publication date because they usually say when the next issue is out. --The1337gamer (talk) 17:03, 26 November 2018 (UTC)
 * The magazine didn't make those dates public. It also didn't have issue numbers. As a result, with just "2000" there's no way for any editor to know which issue contains the cited article. I'll reformat the citation in plain text. JimmyBlackwing (talk) 17:10, 26 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Previous issue says the Holiday 2000 issue of PC Player was released on 24 November: . See the yellow circle in the top right. I would use that since it is the actual publication date: --The1337gamer (talk) 17:28, 26 November 2018 (UTC)

"ign unreliable"
Hi, can you respond to the talk page comment at Corrinne Yu article? The comment sourced the microsoft quote that you said had an unreliable source. Does this source have a past history of unreliable statements? Thanks for your contributions!144.35.114.45 (talk) 02:38, 6 December 2018 (UTC)
 * While IGN staff articles are definitely reliable, their Wikis are not. All wikis that allow for public editing are user generated and considered unreliable. -- ferret (talk) 12:32, 6 December 2018 (UTC)

Reverted
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=The_Witcher_3:_Wild_Hunt&diff=873472180&oldid=873455504

Why? - Alexis Jazz 11:20, 13 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Blurry, miscoloured, PEGI rating and says "PROVISIONAL" in the bottom left. Objectively inferior quality to the non-free version. --The1337gamer (talk) 11:24, 13 December 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Witcher 3 cover art.jpg


A tag has been placed on File:Witcher 3 cover art.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a non-free file with a clearly invalid licensing tag; or it otherwise fails some part of the non-free content criteria. If you can find a valid tag that expresses why the file can be used under the fair use guidelines, please replace the current tag with that tag. If no such tag exists, please add the Non-free fair use tag, along with a brief explanation of why this constitutes fair use of the file. If the file has been deleted, you can re-upload it, but please ensure you place the correct tag on it.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. G M G talk  11:37, 14 December 2018 (UTC)

Fact
The worst poverty is that you can not speak your own language if you consider it important to repeat the word, but only to manage it. 50.192.232.222 (talk) 22:39, 14 December 2018 (UTC)

Notice
Hey again! Not sure if you saw it but I did some work on All Star Cheer Squad by adding the sources in including merging the sequel in because of lack of reliable sources.Jovanmilic97 (talk) 12:53, 26 December 2018 (UTC)

Deprodding of Avenger (1981 video game)
I have removed the tag from Avenger (1981 video game), which you proposed for deletion. I'm leaving this message here to notify you about it. If you still think this article should be deleted, please do not add back to the file. Instead, feel free to list it at Articles for deletion. Thanks! Pavlor (talk) 14:14, 28 December 2018 (UTC)