User talk:ThePURPLEpirate

Sarah McLachlan
A couple of notes: Thanks. Bearcat (talk) 05:24, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
 * 1) The photo you'd like to add is not, as present, properly tagged for Wikipedia's licensing and source requirements. As such, it cannot be used in any article until you've provided the necessary updates.
 * 2) The photo you'd like to add actually has a Kharen Hill credit at the bottom of it — so unless you are Kharen Hill, it's not likely your copyright to release into the public domain in the first place. Can you clarify where you actually got the photo from?
 * 3) Your edit summary seems to imply that we have some sort of requirement to privilege her Surfacing-era appearance over any other phase of her career. Is there an actual reason why that would be the case?


 * Hello. First off, let me clarify that for you. I am not Kharen Hill. The license confused me, as I am a new Wikipedia.org 'editor' (if you'd like). Thus, Wikicommons was ever more confusing. So I apologize for not specifying the correct license. Secondly, I found that photo at the University of Calgary website (http://www.ucalgary.ca/). Seeing as nearly all photos on their website are public domain (and the said Sarah photo had no credit given on the site) I chose it.


 * Lastly, I did not imply that it was a requirement to give more credit to Sarah's Surfacing-era appearance over others. I liked the picture for the same reason others like the current 'live' photo of her. So your point on that is void. Nice try. ThePURPLEpirate (talk) 06:59, 31 January 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Ben worthlisberger
A tag has been placed on Ben worthlisberger, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the article or have a copy emailed to you. Peasantwarrior (talk) 09:27, 3 February 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Ben worthlisberger
A tag has been placed on Ben worthlisberger, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the article or have a copy emailed to you. Bihco (talk) 18:58, 3 February 2009 (UTC)