User talk:TheRealJoeWiki

Nyttend (talk) 02:52, 14 September 2012 (UTC)
 * I also responded.-- SPhilbrick (Talk)  11:58, 14 September 2012 (UTC)

Please fill out our brief Teahouse guest survey
Hello fellow Wikipedian, the hardworking hosts at WP:Teahouse would like your feedback! We have created a brief survey meant to help us better understand the experience of new editors on Wikipedia. You are being selected to participate in our survey because you edited the Teahouse Questions or Guests pages sometime in the last few months.

Click here to be taken to the survey site.

The survey should take less than 10 minutes to complete. We really appreciate your feedback, and we look forward to your next vist to the Teahouse!

Happy editing,

Jonathan and Sarah, Teahouse hosts 02:23, 2 October 2012 (UTC)

The summary line is opinionated and pejorative, does not match citation
The summary paragraph (the introduction) describes rent-seeking very differently than the rent-seeking section of the Wikipedia "public choice" article that it cites. Furthermore, it states definitively that rent-seeking is bad/harmful, which is an opinion, not a fact. Even if "economics" and "public choice theory" felt rent-seeking was bad, the summary should state that *those theories feel it is bad*, and not simply state that it is bad.

In summary, the summary is biased, states as fact what is opinion, and misleadingly suggests that "public choice theory" and "economics" agree with the conclusions stated. TheRealJoeWiki (talk) 20:30, 10 December 2016 (UTC)