User talk:TheWhistleGag

Hello/edit summaries
Hi! It's great to see you uploading new astronomical images. Many of your new images might get reverted, but it's always better to have the choice of a new image than to never see any other options, so It think your images are valuable whether they stay or not. I actually like your Mars picture better, and will try to get it to stay as the main picture sometime soon.

I have one request though-- please leave edit summaries with your edits. They serve two purposes: they make it easier to read the page history and they let other editors know the reasoning behind the change you made. For instance, something like "changed lead image to higher-res image" or "made lead image square-ish". A2soup (talk) 21:09, 21 February 2015 (UTC)

Okay, then...
I understand.

I just liked the recency the images showed.


 * I don't mean to be discouraging-- by all means, keep trying new images if you think they are better! Just leave edit summaries briefly stating why you think the new images are better, so that others can better decide whether to keep them or not. Also, if someone reverts your image but you still think it is better, you can start a section on the talk page about which one should be used so that there can be a proper discussion. A2soup (talk) 21:13, 21 February 2015 (UTC)

Mars picture
If you want to keep the Rosetta Mars picture, you need to show that it is free to use. I don't know much about this since I don't upload files, but everything you need to know and instructions on what to do are linked in the template under. A2soup (talk) 04:31, 22 February 2015 (UTC)

Mars
Hi. Mars is the red planet, so it is nice color enhancement, better resolution, please keep the 2007 Rosetta image. This is a better way to discuss the page at least. Thank you! :) -- Jcpag2012  (a.k.a. John Carlo) from Wikipedia 05:52, 22 February 2015 (UTC)


 * Okay, Mars is known as the "red planet" but the actual hue is more orangey. It seems extremely silly to me to artificially turn it red in the lead image just to fit a colloquialism ("red planet") that dates to before it was ever even visited by spacecraft. Let's let it look how it actually looks, not make it look like we want it to. I was wrong, "enhanced" color image was listed by ESA as true color. A2soup (talk) 06:06, 22 February 2015 (UTC)

Jupiter
Please keep the 2007 image from New Horizons. Thank you! -- Jcpag2012  (a.k.a. John Carlo) from Wikipedia 05:57, 22 February 2015 (UTC)

Okay...
Someone please search up "Mars Rosetta" and find a non-color-enhanced version of Mars. In full. Please do it for me.

Thank you very much.

Signing your talk page messages
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either: This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
 * 1) Add four tildes  ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment; or
 * 2) With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button (Insert-signature.png or Signature icon.png) located above the edit window.

Thank you. --David Biddulph (talk) 11:37, 26 February 2015 (UTC)

Welcome!
Hello, TheWhistleGag, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
 * Introduction and Getting started
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! --David Biddulph (talk) 11:38, 26 February 2015 (UTC)

Epsilon Canis Majoris
I notice you are moving articles to various star names. Please don't do that, it's very disruptive. Please read WP:Article titles (more specifically, the section WP:COMMONNAME), where it talks about making the title of an article the most commonly recognized name. Adhara is nowhere near as commonly used as Epsilon Canis Majoris, and the other stars you are moving have the same problem. Tarl N. ( discuss ) 21:50, 7 November 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 1
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Interstate 78, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Springfield Township, New Jersey ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Interstate_78 check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Interstate_78?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:02, 1 January 2020 (UTC)

TV Tropes
You added a citation to TV Tropes about the website's crash. I am afraid it currently links to no source on the information. It only says "ERROR: Unable to connect to database server!"

Where did you get the information on the loss of pages? Dimadick (talk) 18:57, 7 July 2020 (UTC)

That was the source, but I have a tweet as well. I will add it. TheWhistleGag (talk) 19:05, 7 July 2020 (UTC)

Proxima Centauri
Hello! I noticed you reverted Proxima d's discovery date back to 2019—however I thought the first paper mentioning it was published in 2020. Was there an article or something I didn't see? (I'm not trying to start a dispute I just genuinely want to know what I missed). Thanks! :) Supernova58 (talk) 20:47, 2 August 2020 (UTC)


 * I did not do that; not on purpose. The data was gathered in 2019, but it was released in 2020. TheWhistleGag (talk) 20:49, 2 August 2020 (UTC)


 * Ah — no problem; thanks for the clarification! Supernova58 (talk) 21:43, 2 August 2020 (UTC)

December 2020
Hello, I'm Sol505000. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to French phonology have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. Sol505000 (talk) 10:17, 12 December 2020 (UTC)

Please do not mark all edits as minor
Thank you for your contributions to Neptune Odyssey. I noticed you marked your edits as minor, even though you added significant new content to the article. I looked at your recent contributions across Wikipedia and it seems you mark all of your edits as minor. Please take a look at Help:Minor edit. Minor edits include those that fix typos or other mistakes, fix links, or revert vandalism. They are not any edit which adds or changes the content of an article. Many editors do not pay as much attention to minor edits, so its important that edits marked as minor truly are minor edits. Thanks! Mdewman6 (talk) 17:21, 23 June 2021 (UTC)


 * Ah, thanks! It's just become force of habit recently since so many of my edits have been grammar edits. I'll make sure that any substantial edits are not marked as minor in the future. TheWhistleGag (talk) 20:38, 23 June 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:24, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:46, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

January 2024
Hi TheWhistleGag! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor&#32;at Symphony No. 4 (Brahms) that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. ''Not a big deal, but I see that you have been warned about this before. So please be more careful in the future.'' CurryTime7-24 (talk) 17:25, 31 January 2024 (UTC)


 * Alright, thanks, sorry about that--force of habit. I'll be more careful with it in the future. TheWhistleGag (talk) 17:30, 31 January 2024 (UTC)