User talk:The Avengers

Semi protect my talk page
An IP sock-troll came to post unblock request on my talk page. I filed SPI against him in the past. Semi-protect my talk page and my user page also indefinitely. The IP geolocates to Moscow.

-- The   Aven gers  15:01, 25 December 2015 (UTC)

Please semi-protect my talk page and user page indefinitely. -- The   Aven gers  16:05, 25 December 2015 (UTC)
 * I don't see any need for an IP to edit here with the account blocked, so I have done as you request. 16:10, 25 December 2015 (UTC)
 * I am 99% sure that the IP belongs to User:Никита-Родин-2002. You can file SPI or ask a check user. I had reported him in past. He is the only Russian sock master I ever came across. The   Aven gers  16:14, 25 December 2015 (UTC)
 * I think they're probably best ignored, to be honest. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 16:15, 25 December 2015 (UTC)


 * Continuously and unrepentantly lying about not being CE at your SPI is not exactly consistent with this unblock request. You continued to contest that you were not him. Now you want an admin to unblock you with the excuse that you can not access that account? It's a really bad excuse. -- lTopGunl (talk) 08:59, 27 December 2015 (UTC)
 * I am not going to revert your comment. But you can ask a check user, when was the last time CosmicEmperor actually logged in. You can also ask arbitrators which is the registered E-Mail of CosmicEmperor. After that use gmail to login as . You will get the red message, . I have deleted the E-Mail in July. The   Aven gers  09:13, 27 December 2015 (UTC)
 * That's the issue. You don't negate your sock puppetry. Having been CU confirmed, it does not matter wheather CE had not logged in (or can not log in). Even without my comment a CU knows that. My comment was at you that this doesn't do. -- lTopGunl (talk) 09:16, 27 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Whatever the issue, I can never login with CosmicEmperor account. Indefinite block is not infinite. You can stop me for some time, but not forever. The   Aven gers  09:24, 27 December 2015 (UTC)
 * That your misunderstanding of WP:Blocking policy. If you intend to wait and then get unblocked only to come back with your POV pushing, trolling and stalking editors and / or making blanket accusations against long term editors like you did with your CE account, the "wait" will have no meaning. Secondly, socking is even more of a "no no". Regardless, we can not tell if you actually dont have access to that account and have not intentionally deleted the email account even if this mattered some how. -- lTopGunl (talk) 09:26, 27 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Came back to troll and stalk whom??????? It's very natural to forget password if it's difficult password and you don't login for months. Yes I intentionally deleted that email as I won't be able to reset my password through registered E-mail and I will never be able to login as CosmicEmperor.   The   Aven gers  09:35, 27 December 2015 (UTC)


 * Perhaps if rollback/pending changes permissions were removed and the editor agreed to go through mentorship as well as the self-imposed conditions above a CU would agree to unblock and give the editor some WP:ROPE? -- samtar whisper 09:05, 27 December 2015 (UTC)
 * , if you check out the level of trolling at his SPI and the reason for his original block, you might want to reconsider even that opinion: Sockpuppet_investigations/CosmicEmperor/Archive. -- lTopGunl (talk) 09:08, 27 December 2015 (UTC)
 * In that SPI you made a comment about administrator shopping. No one was blocking me, I emailed three administrators GorillaWarfare, Mike V, Anna Frodesiak the truth. Still they were not blocking me. After that I emailed oversight as mentioned by Mike V. Your proofs were not enough to block me, if i had not accepted. The   Aven gers  09:18, 27 December 2015 (UTC)
 * No SPI administrator negated my points but anyway, emailing in private while trolling in public will not instill anymore confidence in anyone. -- <b style="color:#060">lTopGunl</b> (<b style="color:#000">talk</b>) 09:21, 27 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Then why I was not getting blocked by any administrator before my emails? The   Aven gers  09:25, 27 December 2015 (UTC)
 * WP:SOUP at the SPI? Anyway, let's see what your reviewing admin has to say. -- <b style="color:#060">lTopGunl</b> (<b style="color:#000">talk</b>) 09:30, 27 December 2015 (UTC)

Reviewing administrator may not unblock me right now, As I said indefinite block is not infinite. The  Aven gers  09:34, 27 December 2015 (UTC)
 * I thought will support The Avengers because somewhere he is supporting another sock puppeteer. But TopGun has different stand here, maybe his mood changes with different socks. But my stand is same on both sockpuppeteers, both should try for six month standard offer and should not repeat such sock puppetry in future. -- Human 3015   TALK    17:14, 27 December 2015 (UTC)
 * If Mar4d reverts comments from his talk page, it's his talk page right. If I revert comment then I am not following talk page guidelines. He supports Mar4d but is obsessed with my talk page. Still administrators remain silent and watch like mute spectators. He accuses others of POV pushing. Doesn't he has his own POV in supporting Mar4d and accusing me? The   Aven gers  17:59, 27 December 2015 (UTC)


 * Note Archive or don't archive; remove or don't remove; you have that freedom as long as the discussion context is preserved. You're also free to unbox this discussion and continue the discussion but as far as I can tell, both sides have demonstrated hostility in form of accusations and bad faith. If the discussion does continue then further measures may need to be taken, but do not expect them to be one sided. I personally recommend to simply let this die and not speak to each other. Mkdw talk 19:10, 29 December 2015 (UTC)

The  Aven gers  08:57, 17 March 2016 (UTC)

Help me!
Please help me with...Though it may not help me much, but still I request administrators to remove the false/wrong taggings from these accounts:


 * was tagged by TopGun


 * User:Cosmic will return iafter April 2016 with a new identity user page created by topgun


 * User:CosmicEmperor is Maheshkumaryadav also tagged by topgun.


 * User:Gta1077 tagged by Favonian for God knows what reason. Favonian is an administrator not a Check User. I can't see any edit from this account.

Check users who are active in SPIs will confirm that I didn't create these accounts.

The  Aven gers  10:04, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Talkpage access disabled. SQL <sup style="font-size: 5pt;color:#999">Query me!  11:35, 7 April 2016 (UTC)

--UTRSBot (talk) 06:49, 15 June 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Singh Is Bling.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Singh Is Bling.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:48, 16 October 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Roti 1974.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Roti 1974.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:55, 21 December 2018 (UTC)