User talk:The Four Deuces/Archives/2012/February

9/11 CT article
Was this comment meant to be in jest? If it was then I would like to know what your serious opinion is on the subject.--The Devil&#39;s Advocate (talk) 23:27, 3 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Ultimately, all conspiracy theories come back to the Jews. TFD (talk) 05:02, 4 February 2012 (UTC)
 * I agree that most conspiracy theories involving developed nations mention people who are Jewish at some point and usually there is some variant that makes a big stink about those individuals being Jewish, but I don't think that means it would be reasonable to label all conspiracy theories based on that. Conspiracy theories are really just claims of government/corporate malfeasance so the idea that we should say they are inherently about Jews is worrisome.--The Devil&#39;s Advocate (talk) 06:40, 4 February 2012 (UTC)

Evolution as fact and theory
Hi-- I've added a few comments to the talkpage for this article, and invite you to take a look. Thanks. Milkunderwood (talk) 19:20, 8 February 2012 (UTC)

Talk:Far-left politics
I am sending this message to all the editors which I believe have been engaged in reversions on this article. Please discuss and gain consensus before removing/adding the section. &mdash;Dark 09:19, 10 February 2012 (UTC)

POV Tag
That was uncivil of you. Please replace the tag until we've discussed this, unless you feel that further discussion is pointless and we should move straight into arbitration. TreacherousWays (talk) 17:21, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Never mind. I have reverted the text in the section added by Rick Norwood. Since the source is cited for both versions, I am asking for either a different source or a clearer cite including page numbers. TreacherousWays (talk) 19:09, 13 February 2012 (UTC)

Request for attention to an RS/N item
Dear TFD. As I value your opinion highly, I would value your attention and contribution to this RS/N discussion of the potential reliability or unreliability of using professional oral history. Fifelfoo (talk) 01:15, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

Rename at Campaign for "santorum" neologism
Hello, since you recently participated in an RfC at Campaign for "santorum" neologism, I thought you might be interested in this proposal for renaming the article, or perhaps another of the rename proposals on the page. Best, Be— —Critical  22:07, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

If you want to argue with me about the content of what I added to the far left article, I do not want to talk with you
By the tone of what you said it sounds like you are argumentative over what I added, if you are this way, I do not want to talk with you now. I am not in the mood to argue over the content of the material that was recently added. I paraphrased information from a scholarly book I found on Google Books. Just look up the source on Google books. If you have a problem with the content post it on the talk page of the article. I do not want to talk about it now, or on my talk page.--R-41 (talk) 04:30, 18 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Hi R-41!
 * Glad to see that you are still active.
 * Please do not leave angry messages for TFD! That's my department! ;)
 * Cheers, Kiefer .Wolfowitz 11:12, 18 February 2012 (UTC)

Second Amendment to the United States Constitution
Thanks for your input at the Second Amendment talk page. Apologies again for my technical mishap with editing that article. I have added a section to the talk page explaining my intended edits, your further input would be appreciated. -Stevertigo (t | c) 07:56, 21 February 2012 (UTC)

Bad you!
You nominate Foundation for the Investigation of Communist Crimes for deletion. The same evening the organization's founder Mart Laar – then acting prime minister of Estonia – suffers a stroke – no doubt because of the stress caused by your hostile actions. None of his Wikipedia supporters are able to materialize in support of the article and it is deleted. If you had any decency you would have asked the deletion discussion to be suspended until Laar could recover from his illness. -- Petri Krohn (talk) 07:23, 26 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Kierkegaard's character in Eithor/Or said, "They never use the liberties they have, they demand those they do not have. They have freedom of thought, they demand freedom of speech." There is an unfortunate direct influence of Stalinism on modern E. European nationalist ideology and tactics.  TFD (talk) 04:01, 27 February 2012 (UTC)