User talk:Thegunkid

Abkhaz roundel
You forgot to note if you created that image, without copyright status, it will be deleted, so you might want to fix that. :) - The Bushranger (talk) 20:19, 27 April 2010 (UTC)

Russian Air Force Roundel
Dear new user

Please do not add this blue-red-white rounder to the article. This roundel is used by Russian Border Force aircraft. Furthermore, the Russian DUMA has voted against roundel change last year (please research this on-line and also see the page talk section). So the red star will remain as the roundel.

Also, the contents in the Govt. link you provided were highly ambigious and doesn't have any images attached to it for confirmation.

I have notified experts (admin) of this constant vandalism and if you keep on changing the content without discussing it first, you could risk being blocked from editing contents in future.

Thanks - Ash sul (talk) 23:42, 2 April 2010 (UTC)


 * The Government Link I posted had a .doc file attached with the Images. Here's the direct link to that .doc if you can not locate the link on the Page I linked

I have also extracted the Image of the newly approved Roundel and uploaded it if you cannot for some reason view the .doc.

Title: Многоцветный рисунок - знака государственной принадлежности - изображения пятилучевой звезды (Eng- Multi-color image of the mark of nationality - images five-pointed star)

Meanwhile The Act stated the Star is for Military Aircraft only, to support this, recent Images of Russian State Aircraft show them with the new fin flash in place of where the Red Star was formerly applied.

Also to add to this, the Russian Page on Wikipedia shows the Tricolor Roundel being the official one with two citations --Thegunkid (talk) 14:44, 1 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Hi Thegunkid, greetings from New Zealand. Thanks for your contributions regarding the new roundel. However the discussion on the talkpage at the moment does not seem to make clear whether the three-colour design has actually been accepted, or rejected, by the Federation Council. Please check what the actual official status is and cite your sources before making any further edits on this. Cheers and thanks, Buckshot06 (talk) 11:07, 6 May 2010 (UTC)

File:Louis Michel Aury flag.png missing description details
Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as File:Louis Michel Aury flag.png is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors to make better use of the image, and it will be more informative for readers.

If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 17:18, 6 January 2011 (UTC)

Tunis
I suggest to put Tunisia in colunt with rebel forces and coalition states with note that there are border clashes but without official statement that Tunisia is in the war. I think that this would be the most precise solution.--Vojvodae please be free to write :) 12:21, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

Uhh, last time I checked Tunisia isn't picking sides... yet, but they are currently engaged in combat with Gaddafi Forces in defense and not on the side of the Rebels so they need to be placed in their own box --Thegunkid (talk) 12:31, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

US flag colors
As a participant in the most recent debate I can find on this subject, I thought you might be interested in this discussion here. Thanks.  CRRays Head90  | Get Some! 20:03, 30 July 2012 (UTC)

Notification of automated file description generation
Your upload of File:Abkhaz Roundel.png or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 11:18, 7 December 2013 (UTC)

An updated "The Flags and Seals of Texas"
In case you hadn't seen it, an update version of Charles A. Spain's "The Flags and Seals of Texas": http://nava.org/digital-library/frq/FRQ_010_2016.pdf.

Enjoy. TuckerResearch (talk) 14:20, 24 April 2018 (UTC)

-Thank you, that reminds me I need to get ahold of one of the Inkscape guys about working on some stuff. --Thegunkid (talk) 08:17, 25 April 2018 (UTC)

Unspecified source/license for File:2020 tennessee license plate.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:2020 tennessee license plate.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like (to release all rights),  (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * File copyright tags

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (Talk • Contribs • Owner) 21:46, 11 June 2020 (UTC)