User talk:Theparties

Automatic invitation to visit WP:Teahouse sent by HostBot
Wow. Thank you.

DYK for The Magical Delights of Stevie Nicks
— Crisco 1492 (talk) 16:03, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Yehey, I'm happy.--Theparties (talk) 21:31, 16 January 2014 (UTC)

Featured picture candidates/Ifugao Tribesman
Love it. fabulous.--11:42, 2 February 2014 (UTC)

DYK for Sasheer Zamata
Thanks from the DYK project and I Victuallers (talk) 00:02, 3 February 2014 (UTC)

DYK for Imelda (film)
Orlady (talk) 05:17, 9 February 2014 (UTC)

The Magical Delights of Stevie Nicks DYK
Thanks for nominating the episode article for DYK! Since it was approved, it became the second most viewed DYK article in January 2014 and was ranked 731 on WPTV's popular pages, which, you'll notice does not include many (if any) episode articles! Thanks again! —  Wylie pedia  18:42, 11 February 2014 (UTC)

DYK for Fernanda Lima
The DYK project (nominate) 00:02, 16 February 2014 (UTC)

DYK for Orlando Quevedo
— Crisco 1492 (talk) 08:02, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

Dom Justo Takayama
Nice work on the article. FYI, per the rules, an article may only be featured once per year (there are a few exceptions for holidays and observances), so I removed the article from February 4, leaving it on February 3. Thanks. — howcheng  {chat} 19:09, 2 March 2014 (UTC)

March 2014
You have been blocked temporarily from editing for inappropriately marking edits as minor. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. -- Mufka (u) (t) (c) 12:20, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
 * When this current block expires, be aware that you are very likely to be blocked for edit warring if you continue your activities at Philippines. -- Mufka (u) (t) (c) 12:26, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
 * I am going to address why I mark all my edits as minor. There is a tendency I have to get into fights with other people and I just don't want that. Marking them minor makes me avoid these. It's not to be rude, no offence.--Theparties (talk) 8 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes, marking all of your edits "minor" does mean fewer people will see them. This is exactly why marking all of your edits as "minor" is not acceptable. - Sum mer PhD  (talk) 19:20, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
 * I'm sorry, I did not thought it was a big deal because I had been doing it for four months and no one complained until now. Fine, I am not going to do it again.-- ♥  00:02, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
 * No one complained? - Sum mer PhD  (talk) 00:48, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Oh! I forgot about that one in December. Fine. I'm stopping. You win.-- ♥  00:51, 9 March 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Imelda (film)
The article Imelda (film) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Imelda (film) for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- 16:21, 11 March 2014 (UTC)

Your new signature
Can you please change your signature so that it contains your username? A heart symbol doesn't really help people in identifying who you are. Sᴠᴇɴ Mᴀɴɢᴜᴀʀᴅ  Wha?  01:39, 13 March 2014 (UTC)
 * The new signature works. Thanks, Sᴠᴇɴ Mᴀɴɢᴜᴀʀᴅ   Wha?  17:40, 13 March 2014 (UTC)
 * You're welcome.-- ♥ (Theparties) 23:04, 13 March 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Imelda (film)
The article Imelda (film) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Imelda (film) for comments about the article. Well done! Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- 13:31, 13 March 2014 (UTC)

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for inappropriately marking edits as minor even after a recent block, as you did at Juliette Barnes. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. -- Mufka (u) (t) (c) 23:21, 13 March 2014 (UTC)

@Gabriel Yuji (talk), I honestly don't know how to upload an image without any copyright issues. I may be able to fill the rest of the infobox once my block expires. In the meantime, could you find anyone who can do it?-- ♥ (Theparties) 15:14, 14 March 2014 (UTC)
 * I can upload it. I found this and this image. Do you have any preference or another image? Gabriel Yuji (talk) 19:12, 14 March 2014 (UTC)
 * The second one. I went to an error page for the first one.-- ♥ (Theparties) 22:13, 14 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Does this link work? Gabriel Yuji (talk) 04:44, 15 March 2014 (UTC)

DYK for Saddle Ridge Hoard
The DYK project (nominate) 00:02, 18 March 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Imelda Marcos
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Imelda Marcos you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jonesey95 -- 20:00, 25 March 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Imelda Marcos
The article Imelda Marcos you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Imelda Marcos for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jonesey95 -- 01:41, 31 March 2014 (UTC)

Unblock request
{Unblock|1=(I am putting this unblock on hold as I figure out what to do next.) Seven months have passed since this block/ban was implemented. The list that justified this "ban" has been deleted because the pro-deletion side commented that it is based on "outdated" information. The user who imposed this block has been inactive for over a month. That user has also created a page about me that may violate Wikipedia's policies about privacy and personal information and that page should be deleted. There have been many times when I have filed appeals to the Ban Appeals Subcommittee but I was always denied and I have grown to be disillusioned by that process. I would like to invoke the "second chance" policy and I would like to cut my ties to my old account and start over fresh and new.}}


 * This is a checkuser block and requires either the Arbitration Commitee (through the Ban Appeals Sub Committee) or a checkuser to authorise your unblock. Editors and administrators, other than checkusers, are unable to assist you in this request. You may wish to use the WP:UTRS system to more quickly make a checkuser aware of your request, however.
 * Also, when filing an unblock request, do NOT keep editing it and causing edit conflicts. Nick (talk) 12:53, 12 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Alright, thanks. I am going to try your suggestion. And sorry for creep-editing. I was trying to cram all the info.- ♥ (Theparties) 12:58, 12 November 2014 (UTC)


 * Since you claim this unblock request is "on hold", I've disabled it. However, were I to respond to it, I'd be sure to point out that the request doesn't address either the reason for your original blocks nor the abuse of multiple accounts, but instead depends on irrelevencies such as that the person who blocked you hasn't been active in the last couple months and created a quite appropriate long term abuse page about you. You'll need to get the arbitration committee to lift this block and give you another chance; I assure you, with your history, an unblock request on this page, especially as poor as this one, will not be fulfilled. --jpgordon:==( o ) 15:00, 12 November 2014 (UTC)

"Filipino communism" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Filipino communism. The discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 June 11 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Pandakekok9 (talk) 03:34, 11 June 2020 (UTC)

Custom signature fix needed
Hi there! You have a custom signature set in your account preferences. Changes to Wikipedia's software have made your current custom signature invalid.

The problem: Your signature contains a syntax error or obsolete HTML tags.

The solutions: You can reset your signature to the default, you can fix your signature, or you can do nothing.

Solution 1: Reset your signature to the default: Solution 2: Fix your custom signature: Solution 3: Do nothing:
 * 1) Find the signature section in the first tab of Special:Preferences.
 * 2) Uncheck the box (☑︎→☐) that says "Treat the above as wiki markup."
 * 3) Remove anything in the  text box.
 * 4) Click the blue "" button at the bottom of the page.  (Do not click the red "" button, which will reset all of your preference settings, not just the signature.)
 * 1) Find the signature section in the first tab of Special:Preferences.
 * 2) Click the  button next to the error to learn how to fix the error.
 * 3) Update your signature to fix the error.
 * 4) Click Save to update to your newly fixed signature.
 * 1) In accordance with a recent request for comment, all invalid signatures will be changed to the default, which looks like "Example (talk)", one month from now. If you have followed these instructions and still want help, please leave a message at Wikipedia talk:Signatures. Thank you! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:05, 2 February 2024 (UTC)