User talk:TheresaWilson

NOTE '''If you leave a message here, I will respond here, unless you ask for a response on your talk page. Similarly, if I comment on your talk page, I will look for a reply there. Welcome!'''

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome!
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Templates
To answer your question, I have no idea. I'm sorry. --*Kat* (talk) 04:48, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

Requests for adminship/Ed Poor 2
Ok, since you don't mind the question being asked - how did you become aware of Ed's RfA.  Ry an P os tl et hw ai te  22:42, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
 * It is the subject of much amusement at RationalWiki. TheresaWilson (talk) 22:47, 17 July 2008 (UTC)

my conservapedia edits
Guess what? I just got reverted just for trying to update the EOBIW page on a situation that happened on our John Edwards article, as well as for other articles. The reverting editor called my edits "confusing". I don't know what the heck is going on with them, but I sense something suspicious.--Andrewlp1991 (talk) 23:59, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Mm. That's an editor I'm not familiar with. The trouble is that anything which reduces the degree of "liberalness" here is going to be viewed with extreme suspicion. You've little chance of winning against their preconceptions. TheresaWilson (talk) 00:23, 2 August 2008 (UTC)

Expelled
Hi Theresa,

I am dismayed by the efforts of a few to spin the Expelled discussion as if their need to protect and promote the movie's agenda overrides intellectual integrity.

I wasn't exaggerating when I stated I'd read virtually reference and citation in the article and gone well beyond that, even contributing references of my own. However, there's a core who seem committed to undermining efforts to lay bare the film.

Okay. Rant over.

Where, may I ask, in the UK are you?

--UnicornTapestry (talk) 13:11, 31 July 2008 (UTC)


 * Hi Unicorn: I'm in Nottinghamshire. Creationists are the same the world over. I first really got involved just over a year ago when I found Conservapedia and subsequently RationalWiki. I was absolutely amazed at the creationist/ID scene in the US & am very disappointed to find that it's encroaching in the UK. Obviously I haven't seen the movie but everything I've read makes me believe that it was created as propaganda purely. I can rant but try to hold myself back, having lost my temper in the past and thereby lost my argument - willful stupidity really annoys me. TheresaWilson (talk) 17:01, 31 July 2008 (UTC)


 * I hadn't encountered either of these 'pedias' until now, and I just explored both. It looks like there's a struggle for intellectual honesty within Conservapedia, dogma versus integrity. I noticed some debates start out "Mainstream science is anti-God, therefore it can't be trusted," when nothing is further from the truth. Repeat a lie often enough, and it's believed. I notice a few implied that whatever was said and done to Myers and Dawkins was deserved, while others tried to be more balanced.


 * In the US, we're undergoing an assault upon intellectuality, not merely science, and it's coming from several fronts, not just the DI/ID people. I'd argue Australian Rupert Murdock has single-handedly damaged our country, but he had a lot of help. He took control of right-wing television and to a degree right-wing radio. They call themselves 'neo-cons', since 'far right wing' carries an unpleasant whiff. Since neo-cons fall outside the bounds of true conservatism, we often hear remarks that McCain or W (or any other conservative they disagree with) aren't "true conservatives", or that Bush Sr was a "old-fashioned liberal Republican", or Goldwater's or Buckley's idea of conservatism is "outdated" or "too liberal".


 * At the same time, the far left is just as guilty with their notions of political correctness and undermining education for boys because of feminists' belief schools were prejudiced against girls, especially in math and science. We're now graduating classes where boys aren't prepared for college, particularly in those fields of math and science. Presently, we have school systems that graduate only 50% of their students, compared to high 90%+ in the 1960s. W's first Secretary of Education was found to have manipulated records and student placements to disguise his school system had a dismal record.


 * The federal government moved to take extend control over public libraries and especially library records. Our government wants to know what we're reading and now they want to know what we're viewing. A congressman recently submitted a bill to ban certain web sites in libraries to "protect readers".


 * I believe we're the only nation in the world still officially using the English (Imperial/Royal) system of measurement. We lost an entire Mars mission thanks to some laboratories being on one standard and some on another.


 * It's a tough time for those of us who are educated and peer beyond the rhetoric.


 * (taking breath) I used to work in the UK, consulting mostly from London into the north counties. I saw all the scenic spots, Bradford, Leeds, Manchester, Birmingham, Liverpool, etc. (smile) I remember driving up the, um, M-1, was it? Someone pointed to the left and said, "There's Sherwood Forest." Took all the romance out, he did.


 * --UnicornTapestry (talk) 23:36, 31 July 2008 (UTC)


 * You ought to come over to RatWiki (where I'm SusanG - we're composed of a hard core (the cabal - which doesn't exist) of editors who were kicked out of Conservapedia 15 months or so ago and sundry others of like mind. We endeavour to put forward Rational interpretations of the whackier emanations of blogsites generally and Conservapedia in particular. We've a nice bit of stuff about the Expelled film (just search "Expelled). Conservapedia's site owner has some weird views (he's Phyllis Schlafly's son) - one of the best over recent months has been his insistence that Richard Dawkins' professorship was fraudulent. They're currently proving that Richard Lenski's latest experiments are faked! (see: Lenski dialog) because it corroborates evolution.


 * You can't see Sherwood forest from the M1 & it'd be on the right travelling North. Don't forget that England was once forest top to bottom - we were there before the Brazilians started chopping down their trees! I lived in Sheffield for most of my life so you saw our dirty East End while zooming past on the M1.


 * TheresaWilson (talk) 00:22, 1 August 2008 (UTC)

Affirmative Action President
Regarding Articles for deletion/Affirmative Action President, while reading the Conservapedia article and looking at Conservapedia, like you, I came across the affirmative action reference, but then I stumbled upon Conservapedia actually calling Obama the Affirmative Action President, and then defining it. I edited this into the Comservapedia article, and then used the Affirmative Action President page to define how it was used. I felt this was historically and societally significant. It was NOT an attack upon Obama.

--UnicornTapestry (talk) 14:16, 1 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Never thought it was (an attack) but, as you know, I'm a bit(!) anti-CP and they're bragging about the fact that they started it as a meme. I'd rather not give them publicity. It seems to have died out anyhow so it was probably electronic ephemera. TheresaWilson (talk) 14:35, 1 August 2008 (UTC)

Wrong person fingered.
Thank you for drawing my attention to this slander in User:Ed Poor/POV pushing. I have removed all the incorrect text to User talk:Ed Poor/POV pushing. One cannot of course delete it for good as Wiki keeps the old versions (unless one perhaps is a sysop).

Tabletop (talk) 09:53, 30 November 2008 (UTC)

Hi!
SH!!!!!!!!. TheresaWilson (talk) 20:15, 5 January 2009 (UTC)

Yay!
^_^
 * You no want to talk to mii? 05:04, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Perhaps she doesn't like rabbits?  06:33, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Everyone likes wabbits! >:( 07:22, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Rabbit(s) make a tasty stew. TheresaWilson (talk) 09:43, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Eeek! :o
 * Actually, this wabbit makes a jam sandwich. 09:15, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
 * I prefer marmalade on Toast. TheresaWilson (talk) 10:14, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Easy does it. 13:02, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Easy does it. 13:02, 12 January 2009 (UTC)

FfD to delete Time cover image
Hi. As you were involved in some of the recent discussion and debate about the images in the article on Intelligent design, I thought you might like to know a separate proceeding was brought to try to remove the Time image by outright deletion from the wiki. It's at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Files_for_deletion/2009_February_12#Time_evolution_wars.jpg. If you are at all interested in the issue, it would be reasonable to post a "keep" or a "delete" at that page. ... Kenosis (talk) 12:27, 16 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Hi. You wrote on my talk page:


 * keep. The image is almost iconic as a relevant illustration of the article. I have to admit that my main reason is as an improvement to the readability of the article, however it seems to me that the attempts to lawyer or fiibuster this image off the wiki seem to be bureaucracy for its own sake rather than for the improvement of the article and of Wikipedia as a whole. The spirit of the "law" should be the guidance rather than a particular over severe, one-sided view which the "deletionists" seem to be taking. TheresaWilson (talk) 09:52, 17 February 2009 (UTC)


 * It was interesting to see this post on my talk page. Actually, the appropriate place to post preferences and comments is at the "Files for Deletion" proceeding, which can be found at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Files_for_deletion/2009_February_12#Time_evolution_wars.jpg.
 * ... Regards, Kenosis (talk) 15:36, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Hi again: I now notice your note about being in a hospital bed with webpage limitations. I'll attempt to fulfill your request and see if participants find it appropriate. I wish you a good and preferably speedy recovery. ... Kenosis (talk) 16:38, 17 February 2009 (UTC)

Best wishes.
Saw the note on Ken's page that you were in the hospital. Best wishes. May you have a speedy recovery. JoshuaZ (talk) 20:22, 17 February 2009 (UTC)

Hello!
So how have you been then? 17:03, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

Toast
"I prefer marmalade on Toast" - well it beats garlic(k)... Totnesmartin (talk) 13:57, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Ay'm sure that Ay've no hidea to whhhat you're referrin'. You're hobviously a hwest country bumpkin ov little educashon or breedin', keyndly refrayn from botherin' me in this rawther loutish manner. TheresaWilson (talk) 14:27, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Hello :) Huw Powell (talk) 03:28, 23 March 2009 (UTC)

Hope you're well again
I hope things worked out OK with your health. ... Kenosis (talk) 00:31, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
 * OK now (touch wood) Thanks. TheresaWilson (talk) 00:34, 25 March 2009 (UTC)

Crackpots
Awesome. Thanks :) – ClockworkSoul 15:45, 18 August 2009 (UTC)

Mending?
Hey!

What's this I hear about your being in the hospital?

And what happened to RatWiki?

I hope you're doing well, now!

--UnicornTapestry (talk) 21:18, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
 * I was in, now I'm out.
 * Ratwiki's suffered a server collapse & the server owner won't be back until 7th Sept> We've been free lodging at Bob M's site but we've blown his bandwidth so we're homeless again. TheresaWilson (talk) 01:14, 1 September 2009 (UTC)


 * I'm glad to hear you're doing better. hugs, --UnicornTapestry (talk) 00:58, 3 September 2009 (UTC)

Category question
I created a category for Category:Romeo and Juliet films that I'd like to verify if I have it right before proceeding much further.

This category (which has potential to reference 50 or so films and screen adaptations), I intended to be a more specific category within Category:Shakespeare on film. As I understand it, it would be redundant to include both Category:Shakespeare on film and Category:Romeo and Juliet films, but it feels eerie removing the Shakespeare on Film category.

Am I moving in the right direction?

Thanks. --UnicornTapestry (talk) 21:22, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Aah... wrong place? TheresaWilson (talk) 01:15, 1 September 2009 (UTC)

Alliance
I have just thought of an idea that could help to improve your WikiProject (Nottinghamshire). I have looked at the counties in the East Midlands and Compared them to the amount of those counties with WikiProjects, they are Lincolnshire, Nottinghamshire and Derbyshire. We all share a common purpose, that is to work on the articles of our county's which includes local history, geography and biographies.

Therefore to help us share methods of research and many other needs (basically 'constructive collaboration' as I call it) I am proposing that we form an alliance, NOT a Merger. I believe an alliance allows us to be independent just as before but in collaboration as well. This could really benefit our WikiProjects and I feel we might be the first in Wikipedia's history. I am a member of WikiProject Lincolnshire, I have founded WP:Latin and have already proposed the idea with relatively positive feedback still coming in and have placed a notice in WikiProject England. 95jb14 (talk) 17:46, 24 September 2009 (UTC).

WikiProject Yorkshire Newsletter - October 2009
Delivered October 2009 by ENewsBot. If you do not wish to receive the newsletter, please add an * before your username on the Project Mainpage. → Please direct all enquiries to the WikiProject talk page. → This newsletter/release was delivered by ENewsBot · 08:27, 1 October 2009 (UTC)

WikiProject Yorkshire Newsletter - November 2009
{| class="navbox collapsible collapsed" style="text-align: left; border: 2px; margin-top: 0.2em;" ! style="background-color: #CCCCFF; border: 2px #007FFF solid; -moz-border-radius:20px;text-align: center;" |The Yorkshire WikiProject Newsletter {| style="width: 100%; border: 1px gray solid; background-color:#CCCCFF;" The WikiProject Yorkshire Newsletter Issue 19 - November 2009
 * style="border: solid 1px grey;"|
 * style="border: solid 1px grey;"|
 * valign="middle" style="width: 55%; border: 0px; background-color:#CCCCFF; padding: 1em" |

October issue Got any suggestions? — Add them here 
 * valign="middle" align="right" style="width: 45%; border: 0px; background-color:#CCCCFF; padding: 1em;" |
 * valign="top" style="border: 2px #007FFF solid; padding: 1em; width: 45%; background-color:#CCCCFF;" |
 * Project News
 * Welcome to the nineteenth WikiProject Yorkshire monthly newsletter.
 * Welcome to the nineteenth WikiProject Yorkshire monthly newsletter.


 * WP:YORKS is a leading local British WikiProject in terms of the total number of articles supported (up from 7,532 last month to 7,738 on October 30th). WP:GM has the lead in FAs at 43 out of a total number of 2.034 articles. In the area of GAs WP:YORKS at 52 is just ahead of WP:GM who have 47.

If you would like to discuss changes to Priorities, please join in at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Yorkshire

Currently there are seventeen Yorkshire featured articles:

Henry Moore • Caedmon • Sheffield Wednesday F.C. • George Calvert, 1st Baron Baltimore • History of Sheffield • York City F.C. • Joseph Priestley • Stocksbridge Park Steels F.C. • M62 motorway • Valley Parade • William Wilberforce • History of Bradford City A.F.C. • Last of the Summer Wine • Ealdred (archbishop) • Paulinus of York • Wilfrid • Cosmo Gordon Lang

There are also ten featured lists:

List of York City F.C. Clubmen of the Year • List of York City F.C. managers • List of York City F.C. players • List of York City F.C. seasons • List of Bradford City A.F.C. seasons • List of York City F.C. records and statistics • List of Leeds United A.F.C. seasons • List of Scarborough F.C. seasons • List of awards and nominations received by Arctic Monkeys • List of Sites of Special Scientific Interest in Cleveland

Thank you and well done to all those who contributed.

Drax Power Station passed a GA review on October 5th Thomas of Bayeux peer review initiated on October 8th Sheffield was demoted from FA on October 9th Anne Brontë failed a GA review on October 10th East Riding of Yorkshire peer review initiated on October 23rd Leeds peer review initiated on October 25th David Wetherall passed a GA review on October 26th County Borough of Leeds nominated for GA review on October 26th Philip Larkin peer review initiated on October 27th County Borough of Leeds promoted to GA on October 30th
 * Article Activity


 * Member News

There are now 70 members of WikiProject Yorkshire! A warm welcome to the new members that have joined us since the October newsletter:



No members left the project this month:


 * Thanks


 * For those of you who made changes and looked after the school and university articles after last month's feature.


 * There has again been a number of suggestions on the ToDo list at Yorkshire Portal and this has been kept up to date.


 * The football and rugby editors have continued keeping abreast of most, if not all, of the top clubs.


 * WikiProkject Yorkshire editors have been busy on vandal patrol at watchlist. Thanks.


 * A big to all the editors who help make this WikiProject what it is; no edit goes unnoticed.


 * Priority Articles

The top priority articles that have been identified to date are as follows -


 * Bradford • East Riding of Yorkshire • Henry Moore • Kingston upon Hull • Leeds • North Yorkshire • Ripon • Sheffield • South Yorkshire • Wakefield • West Yorkshire • William Wilberforce • York • Yorkshire • Yorkshire and the Humber

The number has been kept deliberately low to give us a fighting chance of improving them to at least GA status, also so we can concentrate our efforts on these first.

Assess and review
 * Assessment


 * valign="top" style="border: 2px #007FFF solid; padding: 1em; width: 45%; background-color:#CCCCFF;" |


 * Aims

After discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Yorkshire in April 2008.

Specific aims for the project are:-


 * To complete tagging and assessment of all Yorkshire related articles (See below)
 * To recruit more active editors (See Member News)
 * To bring our top level article Yorkshire up to Featured article status
 * To bring all other top priority articles (currently 15 with 2 at FA) to at least Good article status
 * To set up a weekly or monthly selected article improvement drive
 * To produce a regular news letter for circulation to members


 * Popular pages

Arctic Monkeys fight it out with Dracula
The addition of the popular pages facility to the Yorkshire sidebar last month has thrown light on which of our articles Wikipedia readers actually access most. The first month for which there is complete data is September when Arctic Monkeys were in pole position with an average 6,869 hits daily. In second place with 5,781 was Wuthering Heights followed by Dracula with 4,996. The table is sortable on a number of attributes but the sort takes a while to complete.

As the page has a link to current data it is possible to see and compare current raw data for daily hits. So far the October statistics (up to October 20th) reveal that Dracula with 5,474 daily hits is well ahead of seasonal favourite Guy Fawkes with 4,411, and last month's favourite, Arctic Monkeys, are pushed into third position with a daily hit score of 4,259.

Three football clubs Leeds United A.F.C., Hull City A.F.C. and Middlesbrough F.C.get into the top 25 along with several pages about literary topics such as the Brontë family and their works. Television personalities are well represented, Jeremy Clarkson (4,559) is 4th overall in the list and Judi Dench is 23rd with a hit score of 1,577. Do the history topics in the top 25 suggest homework assignments?

It will be interesting to monitor the rise and fall of pages on the list which will also suggest where our efforts as a project might best be directed for maximum impact.


 * Please remember...

The project is subscribed to a clean-up listing which lists articles tagged with various clean-up tags that need attention. The listing is refreshed by a bot on a regular basis. The latest listing was created on September 4th.

Use the watchlist to keep an eye on changes to the project's articles so that vandalism and spamming can be removed as quickly as possible. Many of our articles would benefit from the addition of an appropriate infobox.
 * Monitor
 * Infoboxes

Please remember that the list of stubs needing expansion is always in need of attention. Please take a look and see if you can help. One small edit, such as adding a reference section and reference, to an article each session would make a big difference.
 * References

Please be careful when performing articles moves and ensure that you also move all the talk sub-pages and update any image fair use rational. Otherwise the archives, to-do lists, assessment comments and GA reviews get lost and the image may be deleted as it has an incorrect FUR.
 * Moves


 * Comments, questions and suggestions about this, or any, issue of the newsletter are always welcome and can be made by pressing the feedback button below...



Written by Keith D and Harkey• Template by Jza84 | Single-Page View

'''Would you like to write the next newsletter for WP:YORKS?? Please nominate yourself at WT:YORKS! New editors are always welcome!'''

Delivered November 2009 by ENewsBot. If you do not wish to receive the newsletter, please add an * before your username on the Project Mainpage. → Please direct all enquiries to the WikiProject talk page. → This newsletter/release was delivered by ENewsBot · 01:53, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
 * }
 * }

WikiProject Yorkshire Newsletter - December 2009
Delivered December 2009 by ENewsBot. If you do not wish to receive the newsletter, please add an * before your username on the Project Mainpage.

→ Please direct all enquiries to the WikiProject talk page. → This newsletter/release was delivered by ENewsBot · 03:00, 1 December 2009 (UTC)

WikiProject Yorkshire Newsletter - January 2010
Delivered January 2010 by ENewsBot. If you do not wish to receive the newsletter, please add an * before your username on the Project Mainpage. → Please direct all enquiries regarding this newsletter to the WikiProject talk page. → Newsletter delivered by ENewsBot (info) · 14:54, 2 January 2010 (UTC)

WikiProject Yorkshire Newsletter - February 2010
Delivered February 2010 by ENewsBot. If you do not wish to receive the newsletter, please add an * before your username on the Project Mainpage. → Please direct all enquiries regarding this newsletter to the WikiProject talk page. → Newsletter delivered by ENewsBot (info) · 09:49, 1 February 2010 (UTC)

WikiProject Yorkshire Newsletter - March 2010
Delivered March 2010 by ENewsBot. If you do not wish to receive the newsletter, please add an * before your username on the Project Mainpage. → Please direct all enquiries regarding this newsletter to the WikiProject talk page. → Newsletter delivered by ENewsBot (info) · 10:31, 3 March 2010 (UTC)

WikiProject Yorkshire Newsletter - April 2010
Delivered April 2010 by ENewsBot. If you do not wish to receive the newsletter, please add an * before your username on the Project Mainpage. → Please direct all enquiries regarding this newsletter to the WikiProject talk page. → Newsletter delivered by ENewsBot (info) · 09:14, 1 April 2010 (UTC)

WikiProject Yorkshire Newsletter - May 2010
Delivered May 2010 by ENewsBot. If you do not wish to receive the newsletter, please add an * before your username on the Project Mainpage. → Please direct all enquiries regarding this newsletter to the WikiProject talk page. → Newsletter delivered by ENewsBot (info) · 07:17, 11 May 2010 (UTC)

WikiProject Yorkshire Newsletter - June 2010
Delivered June 2010 by ENewsBot. If you do not wish to receive the newsletter, please add an * before your username on the Project Mainpage. → Please direct all enquiries regarding this newsletter to the WikiProject talk page. → Newsletter delivered by ENewsBot (info) · 10:58, 2 June 2010 (UTC)

WikiProject Yorkshire Newsletter - July 2010
Delivered July 2010 by ENewsBot. If you do not wish to receive the newsletter, please add an * before your username on the Project Mainpage. → Please direct all enquiries regarding this newsletter to the WikiProject talk page. → Newsletter delivered by ENewsBot (info) · 11:47, 8 July 2010 (UTC)

WikiProject Yorkshire Newsletter - August 2010
Delivered August 2010 by ENewsBot. If you do not wish to receive the newsletter, please add an * before your username on the Project Mainpage. → Please direct all enquiries regarding this newsletter to the WikiProject talk page. → Newsletter delivered by ENewsBot (info) · 10:41, 5 August 2010 (UTC)

WikiProject Yorkshire Newsletter - September 2010
Delivered September 2010 by ENewsBot. If you do not wish to receive the newsletter, please add an * before your username on the Project Mainpage. → Please direct all enquiries regarding this newsletter to the WikiProject talk page. → Newsletter delivered by ENewsBot (info) · 07:01, 3 September 2010 (UTC)

WikiProject Yorkshire Newsletter - October 2010
Delivered October 2010 by ENewsBot. If you do not wish to receive the newsletter, please add an * before your username on the Project Mainpage. → Please direct all enquiries regarding this newsletter to the WikiProject talk page. → Newsletter delivered by ENewsBot (info) · 00:32, 4 October 2010 (UTC)

WikiProject Yorkshire Newsletter - November 2010
Delivered November 2010 by ENewsBot. If you do not wish to receive the newsletter, please add an * before your username on the Project Mainpage. → Please direct all enquiries regarding this newsletter to the WikiProject talk page. → Newsletter delivered by ENewsBot (info) · 12:58, 4 November 2010 (UTC)

WikiProject Yorkshire Newsletter - December 2010
Delivered December 2010 by ENewsBot. If you do not wish to receive the newsletter, please add an * before your username on the Project Mainpage. → Please direct all enquiries regarding this newsletter to the WikiProject talk page. → Newsletter delivered by ENewsBot (info) · 00:36, 5 December 2010 (UTC)

WikiProject Yorkshire Newsletter - January 2011
Delivered January 2011 by ENewsBot. If you do not wish to receive the newsletter, please add an * before your username on the Project Mainpage. → Please direct all enquiries regarding this newsletter to the WikiProject talk page. → Newsletter delivered by ENewsBot (info) · 08:27, 6 January 2011 (UTC)

WikiProject Yorkshire Newsletter - February 2011
Delivered February 2011 by ENewsBot. If you do not wish to receive the newsletter, please add an * before your username on the Project Mainpage. → Please direct all enquiries regarding this newsletter to the WikiProject talk page. → Newsletter delivered by ENewsBot (info) · 11:42, 7 February 2011 (UTC)

WikiProject Yorkshire Newsletter - March 2011
Delivered March 2011 by ENewsBot. If you do not wish to receive the newsletter, please add an * before your username on the Project Mainpage. → Please direct all enquiries regarding this newsletter to the WikiProject talk page. → Newsletter delivered by ENewsBot (info) · 22:38, 5 March 2011 (UTC)

WikiProject Yorkshire Newsletter - April 2011
Delivered April 2011 by ENewsBot. If you do not wish to receive the newsletter, please add an * before your username on the Project Mainpage. → Please direct all enquiries regarding this newsletter to the WikiProject talk page. → Newsletter delivered by ENewsBot (info) · 23:31, 8 April 2011 (UTC)

WikiProject Yorkshire
I noticed that you haven't made an edit in over a year. To keep our list up-to-date, I have removed your name from it. If you wish to be a participant again, feel free to ping me or add yourself back into the list.-- Gilderien Chat&#124;List of good deeds 22:14, 1 September 2013 (UTC)