User talk:TonyTheTiger/Archive 102

Happy New Year!
 Dear, HAPPY NEW YEAR Hoping 2015 will be a great year for you! Thank you for your contributions! From a fellow editor, --FWiW Bzuk (talk)

This message promotes WikiLove. Originally created by Nahnah4 (see "invisible note").

WikiCup 2015 launch newsletter
Round one of the 2015 WikiCup has begun! So far we've had around 80 signups, which close on February 5. If you have not already signed up and want to do so, then you can add your name here. There have been changes to to several of the points scores for various categories, and the addition of Peer Reviews for the first time. These will work in the same manner as Good Article Reviews, and all of the changes are summarised here.

Remember that only the top 64 scoring competitors will make it through to the second round, and one of the new changes this year is that all scores must be claimed within two weeks of an article's promotion or appearance, so don't forget to add them to your submissions pages! If you are concerned that your nomination will not receive the necessary reviews, and you hope to get it promoted before the end of the round, please list it on WikiCup/Reviews. However, please remember to continue to offer reviews at GAN, FAC and all the other pages that require them to prevent any backlogs which could otherwise be caused by the Cup. As ever, questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges are reachable on their talk pages. Good luck! , and

If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list or alternatively to opt-out of all massmessage mailings, you may add Category:Opted-out of message delivery to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:51, 2 January 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 31 December 2014

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:10, 2 January 2015 (UTC)

Ready For Love reverts
Hi, considering you've reverted my attempts to add the Australian airdate of Ready For Love (TV series) several times now, I'm wondering why the latest source was not valid, and if you could possibly find a valid source. Whats new? (talk) 08:36, 5 January 2015 (UTC)
 * the last ref showed garbled output when I looked at it. You need a WP:RS for your WP:IC. I am unable to find a RS.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 06:20, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
 * That reference was to a .doc file, are you sure you viewed the file correctly? If you are saying it was "garbled output" perhaps your browser can't view documents.Whats new? (talk) 06:31, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
 * , I have reverted my last edit.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 06:31, 8 January 2015 (UTC)
 * I've added a format parameter in the reference, so it shows the link is a .doc file, which may assist some users with browsers unable to load documents within the browser. Thanks for your assistance. Whats new? (talk) 11:01, 8 January 2015 (UTC)
 * , I have corrected the format.-TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 14:03, 8 January 2015 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 01:14, 6 January 2015 (UTC)

Your input is requested . . ..
Hey, Tony. Happy New Year. I'd like to get your opinion on this revised infobox template for college football players:. After determining what data points to include, we'll recruit a template editor to handle the coding for us. Once we determine what fields we're adding and what we're deleting, then we'll work on the modified graphics. Thanks. Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 16:43, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Tony, when you get a chance, I've responded to the questions you asked on the sandbox talk page. Please let me know if the answers are satisfactory, or if you still have concerns.  Given your long history with WP:CFB, you've more than earned the right to have your say and I want you to be comfortable with what we're doing.  Thanks.  Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 23:51, 12 January 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Piper Chapman
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Piper Chapman you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jaguar -- Jaguar (talk) 17:02, 9 January 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 07 January 2015

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:39, 9 January 2015 (UTC)

Infobox photo discussion
Hi again. Happy New Year. Can you offer your opinion on which photo is better for the Infobox here? If you're not able to participate, just disregard this message; you don't have to message me. Thanks. Nightscream (talk) 01:08, 10 January 2015 (UTC)

Chennai Express GA
I had nominated and fixed the problems with this article a year back, but it's been on hold ever since. I had a back injury soon and forgot about it, when I was inactive. Now that I am back, I think the article can be promoted.  Ethically  Yours! 08:20, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
 * , Talk:Chennai Express/GA1 was closed unsuccessfully. It is not on hold. You will need to renominate the article in order to pursue a promotion.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 04:49, 12 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Well then, would you re-assess it if I renominate? At this juncture I do not see any problem.  Ethically  Yours! 05:05, 12 January 2015 (UTC)
 * , I do not forsee myself being involved in the new review.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 02:37, 13 January 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Piper Chapman
The article Piper Chapman you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Piper Chapman for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jaguar -- Jaguar (talk) 18:42, 11 January 2015 (UTC)

Template:Orpheus and Eurydice
I see that you reverted my edit to the Orpheus and Eurydice template. As long as Orpheus and Eurydice is a disambiguation page, any intentional links to that page should be piped through the (disambiguation) redirect per WP:INTDABLINK. This piping allows those of us at WP:DPL (and the bots that help us) to know that the link is intentional. -Niceguyedc Go Huskies! 23:17, 13 January 2015 (UTC)
 * , noted.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 06:27, 14 January 2015 (UTC)

Speaking of templates
Do you care to do a template on Andrew Lloyd Webber and Tim Rice? They each have separate musicals templates, but not a template of the musicals they did together. Since they were (and are) such a famous duo, their musicals deserve to be collected in a navbox. The template could resemble Template:Rodgers and Hammerstein and/or Template:Rodgers and Hart, but it can start really simple with just their musicals. The musicals they did together are:


 * The Likes of Us
 * Joseph and the Amazing Technicolor Dreamcoat
 * Jesus Christ Superstar
 * Evita
 * Cricket
 * The Wizard of Oz (additional music and lyrics)


 * Songs
 * "Any Dream Will Do"
 * "Close Every Door"
 * "Everything's Alright"
 * "This Jesus Must Die"
 * "I Don't Know How to Love Him"
 * "Superstar"
 * "Oh What a Circus"
 * "Another Suitcase in Another Hall"
 * "Don't Cry for Me Argentina"
 * "You Must Love Me"


 * Films
 * Jesus Christ Superstar
 * Evita


 * Related articles
 * Any Dream Will Do (TV series)
 * Superstar (UK TV series)
 * When Joseph Met Maria
 * Albums (can go in the Related Articles section or separately [before?])


 * Template:Jesus Christ Superstar (has up to three cast albums to list)
 * Template:Evita (has two albums to list)

Anyway, let me know. I've thought about doing one myself but I just haven't had the brainpower and am a true novice at templates. Plus you are such an old hand at this you could bang it out probably in your sleep. Thanks, Softlavender (talk) 01:34, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
 * is their a joint article or category?--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 06:28, 14 January 2015 (UTC)


 * No article, probably because they basically split up after Evita. So the title of the template wouldn't be a single article title, but rather both of their names (plus probably the word "musicals"). There should be a Category (like Category:Musicals by Rodgers and Hammerstein), but there isn't one yet. Softlavender (talk) 06:35, 14 January 2015 (UTC)


 * I went through and found all the songs they wrote together that have articles, and posted them above. I have this page on my Watch list now, so if you reply here I will see it. Softlavender (talk) 11:11, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
 * I don't understand why you can't just create this yourself based on the templates you think I should model this off of, but I will get to this one soon.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 05:59, 15 January 2015 (UTC)


 * I may be able to; that occurred to me as I finished gathering all that information. You're a tough Sensei ; this happened the last time I asked you to help me do an infobox -- you stalled so long I did it myself and I found out I wasn't as helpless as I thought. Cheers, Softlavender (talk) 06:17, 15 January 2015 (UTC)


 * Done! turned out fine. Thanks for being a shoulder to lean on; I guess I just needed some moral support for trying something new. Softlavender (talk) 09:05, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Great.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 21:34, 15 January 2015 (UTC)

File:April 2011 debut issue cover of Treats!.jpg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:April 2011 debut issue cover of Treats!.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 08:25, 16 January 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 14 January 2015

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:27, 16 January 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Tony Vernon
— Crisco 1492 (talk) 16:35, 18 January 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 21 January 2015

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:14, 22 January 2015 (UTC)

About B'Ginnings deletion, "verifiable media coverage", I read many different source articles,(Variety, Billboard, New York Times, Rolling Stone), back in the day, about upcoming club events/ artist tours, reviews of recent notable shows, during the time it was open for business. I worked for the club as Sound Engineer, Stage Manager, Lighting Technician, Disc Jockey 1975-1977. I worked closely with all the bands that performed there, also work closely with the manager(s), promoters, radio, and print media reps. We also had subscriptions(delivered to the club), for Variety, Billboard, Rolling Stone, New York Times, L.A. Times, as well as all Chicago area newspapers. If that was the reason for deletion, have that portion removed, Seeing as though archival information of that type can't be properly confirmed,it doesn't make the source info,(me)false, therefore, leading to the deletion of the whole article. Kesoundman (talk) 00:20, 23 January 2015 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Empire (2015 TV series)
Hello! Your submission of Empire (2015 TV series) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! BlueMoonset (talk) 02:27, 26 January 2015 (UTC)

Django Unchained
Hello Tiger, I'm little confused about this review. Will you please take a look at the review? I nominated the article but the reviewer didn't inform anything at the time of start or the time of finishing the review. I just wanted to let know an experienced editor. Does it need again to be reviewed or is it good? Thanks. -- Captain Assassin! «T ♦ C ♦ G» 10:46, 27 January 2015 (UTC)
 * , you will rarely get the type of review I gave you for Dallas Buyers Club at WP:GAN, but the review you got was suspect. I have opened a discussion at Wikipedia_talk:Good_article_nominations.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 22:04, 27 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Okay, thank you. -- Captain Assassin! «T ♦ C ♦ G» 03:27, 28 January 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 28 January 2015

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:15, 29 January 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Virgin Hotels Chicago
Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:02, 30 January 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Madeline Mitchell for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Madeline Mitchell is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Madeline Mitchell until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Legacypac (talk) 11:11, 31 January 2015 (UTC)