User talk:TonyTheTiger/Archive 58

That march
Tony would you please stop canvasing for the deletion discussion. It would be sad to see repercussions happen because of it. Also, The WP:public domain page says this at the top It is not a forum for discussion about copyright in general. For questions about whether specific works are in the public domain, please visit Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. cheers --Guerillero &#124; My Talk  03:41, 1 May 2011 (UTC)

DYK for Love, Loss, and What I Wore
The DYK project (nominate) 00:03, 2 May 2011 (UTC)


 * Thanks for including me in the DYK nom. All the best!  -- Ssilvers (talk) 16:59, 2 May 2011 (UTC)

FP Delist nom
Hi Tony,

You may not have seen this:. --jjron (talk) 10:33, 2 May 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 2 May 2011
Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 00:20, 3 May 2011 (UTC)

File:20070624 Dubuffet - Court les rues.JPG listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:20070624 Dubuffet - Court les rues.JPG, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted.  S ven M anguard  Wha?  06:34, 3 May 2011 (UTC)

March Slav
In all honesty, I suspect the easiest way of dealing with the March Slav would be to contact the band's conductor directly. Ask for the debate to go on hold while it is, under the presumption that the U.S. obeys copyright laws =) Adam Cuerden (talk) 14:58, 3 May 2011 (UTC)

RE: Template:Golden Globe Award for Best Original Song 1980–1999
The page is not wrong, it is bad organized. Ffor expample, the template should go with A Love That Will Never Grow Old and its two main composers, Gustavo Santaolalla and Bernie Taupin, but no with Emmylou Harris because she didn't work on it and didn't won the award. You should look song by song and add the template to who won the award, similar to Template:AcademyAwardBestOriginalScore 2001-2020. Tb hotch * ۩ ۞ 03:33, 4 May 2011 (UTC)

Mitch Henderson
I posted a note on the DYK page... there appears to be a missing ref? Maury Markowitz (talk) 11:23, 4 May 2011 (UTC)

Your GA has been reviewed
Hi TonyThetiger, How are you today? One of your articles at GAN has been reviewed by me and is currently on hold. YE  Tropical   Cyclone

DYK for Reasons (Earth, Wind & Fire song)
The DYK project (nominate) 06:04, 5 May 2011 (UTC)

Met Ball
Hi, I've started the review process for the above DYK, but I need some clarification before passing it. Could you respond on the DYK page. Cheers. FruitMonkey (talk) 06:53, 5 May 2011 (UTC)

Please help assess articles for Public Policy Initiative research
Hi ,

Your work as an Online Ambassador is making a big contribution to Wikipedia. Right now, we're trying to measure just how much student work improves the quality of Wikipedia. If you'd like contribute to this research and get a firsthand look at the quality improvement that is happening through the project, please sign up to assess articles. Assessment is happening now, just use the quantitative metric and start assessing! Your help would be hugely appreciated!

Thank you, ARoth (Public Policy Initiative) (talk) 17:15, 6 May 2011 (UTC)

GA review
Since I'm reviewing Sydney Johnson, could you in turn review Neil Armstrong for me?


 * I've restored the older posts. Are you ready to review now? Sp33dyphil  Ready • to • Rumble  07:18, 7 May 2011 (UTC)


 * If you know that an article fails GA, it means that you know what the standard is. Sp33dyphil  Ready • to • Rumble  07:29, 7 May 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Colonel Bogey.ogg


A tag has been placed on File:Colonel Bogey.ogg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:10, 7 May 2011 (UTC)

Two Three more Featured Sounds!
Nice finds Tony, keep it up! :) — James (Talk • Contribs) • 12:52pm • 02:52, 8 May 2011 (UTC)

License tagging for File:201104 Prizes Won over Tournaments Played for ElT007.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:201104 Prizes Won over Tournaments Played for ElT007.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 05:05, 8 May 2011 (UTC)

License tagging for File:201104 Allin BB Won over Hands Played for ELLTIGRE007.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:201104 Allin BB Won over Hands Played for ELLTIGRE007.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 05:06, 8 May 2011 (UTC)

License tagging for File:201104 BB Won over Hands Played for ELLTIGRE007.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:201104 BB Won over Hands Played for ELLTIGRE007.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 05:06, 8 May 2011 (UTC)

License tagging for File:201104 Prizes Won over Tournaments Played for ELLTIGRE007.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:201104 Prizes Won over Tournaments Played for ELLTIGRE007.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 05:07, 8 May 2011 (UTC)

FS
Keep up the good work --Guerillero &#124; My Talk  06:20, 8 May 2011 (UTC)

"Here We Go Again (Ray Charles song)"
Wow, thank you so much. I'll fix the links you asked me to, and yes, I feel an infobox for Sinatra's version should be included. Novice7 (talk) 16:29, 8 May 2011 (UTC)
 * I've added the chronology and fixed the Billboard links. I didn't add the infobox for Sinatra version because I want to know your opinion before adding it. Novice7 (talk) 16:59, 8 May 2011 (UTC)
 * I'll add more information to the article and will upload the cover art. For finding all the entries of a particular song, you could try artist "song". Sometimes a few issues won't come up and we'll have to manually find them. Novice7 (talk</b>) 04:19, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
 * I searched for the 2011 version. The song has not been released and has not charted. Whether or not it would be released as a single is still unknown as no websites seem to say about the track's individual release. <b style="font-family:Arial; color:CornflowerBlue;">Novice7</b> (<b style="font-family:Arial; color:DodgerBlue;">talk</b>) 04:43, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
 * I found the cover art for the 7" single (link). Can I upload it? <b style="font-family:Arial; color:CornflowerBlue;">Novice7</b> (<b style="font-family:Arial; color:DodgerBlue;">talk</b>) 05:05, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Yes, I'll upload it now. <b style="font-family:Arial; color:CornflowerBlue;">Novice7</b> (<b style="font-family:Arial; color:DodgerBlue;">talk</b>) 05:09, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
 * You can fill the artist as Ray Charles and title as Here We Go Again. The duet version charted as "Here We Go Again" – Ray Charles with Norah Jones. Also, I can see that Sinatra version charted for two weeks. The issue dated May 31, 1969 is missing from the Billboard archive. <b style="font-family:Arial; color:CornflowerBlue;">Novice7</b> (<b style="font-family:Arial; color:DodgerBlue;">talk</b>) 06:29, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
 * I was referring to Hot 100 alone. It can be found on the same search website. You can view it by selecting All Weeks(Artist or Title required) option. <b style="font-family:Arial; color:CornflowerBlue;">Novice7</b> (<b style="font-family:Arial; color:DodgerBlue;">talk</b>) 06:42, 9 May 2011 (UTC)

Here We Go Again: Celebrating the Genius of Ray Charles
Thanks for the links and info, I expanded the article with the critical acclaims, personnel and recording.-- GD uwen    Tell me!   19:34, 8 May 2011 (UTC)

There is a cover in that album, but I think that there were no singles released previously to the release date of the album itself.-- GD uwen    Tell me!   21:33, 8 May 2011 (UTC)

I did not heard about any singles of that album released for a specific date, mostly in Willie's site (which I visit frequently) always is detailed in the news section when singles or other things related to albums are released. After a Google search, there were no interesting results, rather than the release date of the whole album. Anyway this might (or not) be useful-- GD uwen    Tell me!   21:53, 8 May 2011 (UTC)

Thanks, I just nominated it. Is the first DYK nomination I ever done, so hope that the article it's good enough.-- GD uwen    Tell me!   23:32, 10 May 2011 (UTC)

Well, finally the article appeared on the main page (May 17, 2011). Thanks for recommending me to do it!!!-- GD uwen    Tell me!   00:07, 18 May 2011 (UTC)


 * Sure I'll do, as soon as other articles I have to nominate are passed.-- GD uwen    Tell me!   00:21, 18 May 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 9 May 2011
<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 02:47, 10 May 2011 (UTC)

Here We Go Again (Ray Charles song)
Category:Country music songs is divided into artist categories and not for individual song articles. Eric444 (talk) 04:25, 11 May 2011 (UTC)


 * It seems that it was only nominated in the two categories. As for other charts, the Hung Medien portal includes several charts, but not all. A list of charts deemed acceptable to use on Wikipedia (and instructions on how to source them) is at WP:GOODCHARTS. Adabow (talk · contribs) 04:39, 11 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Using the "site" function in Google, I can see that it did not chart in Japan, or any countries beneath Japan in the table. Adabow (talk · contribs) 07:35, 11 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Enter "site:domain" into a search along with your search terms such as "site:billboard-japan.com" or "site:jp". Adabow (talk · contribs) 08:41, 11 May 2011 (UTC)
 * I searched all four Japanese chart sites. Adabow (talk · contribs) 03:38, 12 May 2011 (UTC)

I've added the Bubbling Under Hot 100 position for Norah Jones and Ray Charles version. <b style="font-family:Arial; color:CornflowerBlue;">Novice7</b> (<b style="font-family:Arial; color:DodgerBlue;">talk</b>) 14:02, 12 May 2011 (UTC)
 * You're welcome. I've also posted the links to a few reviews on the article's talk page. <b style="font-family:Arial; color:CornflowerBlue;">Novice7</b> (<b style="font-family:Arial; color:DodgerBlue;">talk</b>) 14:37, 12 May 2011 (UTC)

Have you looked at the category? It clearly doesn't belong there. Eric444 (talk) 01:30, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Done. Note that articles published at Billboard.com do not need magazine details as the link is used as the reference. Adabow (talk · contribs) 04:42, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
 * You're welcome! I have already searched for the artwork (without success), but I'll have another go. Adabow (talk · contribs) 08:34, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Novice managed to get it! Adabow (talk · contribs) 10:12, 13 May 2011 (UTC)

I guess that works. My objection is not to it being classified as a country song, but it should be added to the category properly, and Category:American country music songs is ideally for artist subcategories only. As long as it's in the categories of the country artists who performed the song, it's redundant to also include it in the main category. Eric444 (talk) 17:49, 13 May 2011 (UTC)

DYK for Met Ball
The DYK project (nominate) 12:02, 12 May 2011 (UTC)

DYK for Mitch Henderson
The DYK project (nominate) 12:04, 13 May 2011 (UTC)

Stubs
hello,

yeah thank you. I like to create stubs and will create as many as possible if I have the time. Regards.-- ♫Greatorangepumpkin♫ T 14:15, 14 May 2011 (UTC)

Videos
I see that you are a big contributor of videos. Are you able to download, convert and upload this? Adabow (talk · contribs) 00:55, 15 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Does this work? Adabow (talk · contribs) 02:05, 15 May 2011 (UTC)
 * You can use it download videos by right-clicking on it and choosing "Save target as". You might need to use Internet Explorer, though. Adabow (talk · contribs) 03:11, 15 May 2011 (UTC)

Great American Wiknic in Chicago
Hi Tony. Can you update Meetup/Chicago 4 with the Wiknic info?--Pharos (talk) 19:33, 15 May 2011 (UTC)

Featured Sounds needs you
Featured sounds was booming with activity in the March/April period, ideally that should be all the time. FS has been a battleground at times, however, it is my hope that that is in the past. I ask you all to reconsider your positions and set aside the differences you may have had with other participants for the good of the project and encyclopedia. Don't let FS become like VP, it is a path that a featured process should traverse. You were sent this message because you are listed at Featured sound candidates/Contributors or have been a past contributor.

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of Featured sound candidates at 09:36, 16 May 2011 (UTC).

Speedy deletion nomination of JuJuan Johnson


A tag has been placed on JuJuan Johnson, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

JuJuan is not his name.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. ~ EDDY  ( talk / contribs )~ 20:51, 16 May 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 16 May 2011
<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 02:24, 17 May 2011 (UTC)

Sound Forge
Hi Tony,

In answer to your question I don't think there is a freeware version of Sound Forge as it's a Sony product. I know there is Audacity and Goldwave but I don't think their audio restoration side will be as good (I could be wrong as I have never done a side-by-side test). You'll find Sound Forge in 2 flavours, either the very expensive Pro here or the cut down and much cheaper home version here. I do have the Pro version which I bought in a fit of excitement, but the home version is fine too. Sadly, there are some things which freeware software won't do very well, and that is anything more involved than simple cutting and pasting....

Good luck!

Ben (aka Major Bloodnok (talk) 22:08, 18 May 2011 (UTC))

Infobox building
Templates for discussion/Log/2011 May 20 may interest you. Both hotel and casino are proposed for merger and I've also proposed for infobox building to be completely converted to pushpin_map and DMS rather than map type and decimal. ♦ Dr. Blofeld  12:16, 20 May 2011 (UTC)

DYK for Here We Go Again (Ray Charles song)
Materialscientist (talk) 16:07, 21 May 2011 (UTC)

DYK nomination of The Firm (U.S. TV series)
Hello! Your submission of The Firm (U.S. TV series) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! AnakngAraw (talk) 22:56, 22 May 2011 (UTC)

Category:Individual animals
As a user who participated in Categories for discussion/Log/2007 April 4, you may be interested in a discussion related to this at Category talk:Individual animals. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 11:14, 23 May 2011 (UTC)

Hector Lopez Defense
He was a terrible defensive player his whole career. Lopez began as a 3rd baseman. Read the entire quote of the source I referenced.

''Now, it is not necessary for me to declare that Hector Lopez was the worst fielding third baseman in the history of baseball. Everyone knows that. It is more or less a matter of public record. But I do feel called upon somehow to try to indicate, if only for the historical archivists among us, the sheer depths of his innovative barbarousness. Hector Lopez was a butcher. Pure and Simple. A butcher. His range was about one step to either side, his hands seemed to be made of concrete and his defensive attitude was so cavalier and arbitrary as to hardly constitute an attitude at all. Hector did not simply field a groundball, he attacked it. Like a farmer trying to kill a snake with a stick. And his mishandling of routine infield flies was the sort of which legends are made. Hector Lopez was not just a bad fielder for a third baseman. In fact, Hector Lopez was not just a bad fielder for a baseball player. Hector Lopez was, when every factor has been taken into consideration, a bad fielder for a human being. The stands are full of obnoxious leather-lunged cretins who insist they can play better than most major leaguers. Well, in Hector's case they could have been right. I would like to go on record right here and now as declaring Hector Lopez the all-time worst fielding major league ballplayer. That's quite a responsibility there, Hector, but I have every confidence you'll be able to live up to it.''

When did Lopez play 3rd base? After 1960, he basically didn't play it any more.

The James quote I also link to is ambiguous about what part of Lopez's career he was referring to or if it was the whole career of Hector's but remember this. James however grew up watching the Kansas City A's and that's where Lopez started his career.- William 15:50, 23 May 2011 (UTC)

Featured topic candidates/Major League Baseball Draft first-round picks/archive1
The naming issue you voiced at the FTC has been fixed (I believe). If you could check in again that'd be great, thanks! Staxringold talkcontribs 19:55, 23 May 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 23 May 2011
<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 02:38, 24 May 2011 (UTC)

DYK for London Ferrill
Hi, Tony - Thanks for reviewing this DYK. Sorry about my confusion; I've corrected the cited source for the hook.Parkwells (talk) 15:59, 24 May 2011 (UTC)

Please take the Wikipedia Ambassador Program survey
Hi Ambassador,

We are at a pivotal point in the development of the Wikipedia Ambassador Program. Your feedback will help shape the program and role of Ambassadors in the future. Please take this 10 minute survey to help inform and improve the Wikipedia Ambassadors.

WMF will de-identify results and make them available to you. According to KwikSurveys' privacy policy: "Data and email addresses will not be sold, rented, leased or disclosed to 3rd parties." This link takes you to the online survey: http://kwiksurveys.com?u=WPAmbassador_talk

Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments, Thank You!

Amy Roth (Research Analyst, Public Policy Initiative) (talk) 20:46, 24 May 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for all of your work
I am particularly impressed with the thoroughness of the Academy Award for Best Foreign Film navbox. Thanks again and cheers. MarnetteD | Talk 01:38, 25 May 2011 (UTC)


 * |File:Pantheratigris.jpg|Your work is so tireless that I hope that you get some sleep like this tiger. ~ Well I am not very good at working with pics. I am trying to add this one that I have put in the nowiki command. When I preview it the pic itself looks ok but I get an extra box that that seems to have part of my signature in it beside it. The solution is probably something simple but I did not want to leave your page a mess so please feel free to add this and again thanks for all of your work. MarnetteD | Talk 01:59, 25 May 2011 (UTC)

Instrumentation
I'm sorry, but the info in the two books was all to do with the album in general, and not much is mentioned about HWGA specifically (nothing in one of them). Adabow (talk · contribs) 04:20, 25 May 2011 (UTC)

File:Rossini-William Tell Overture.ogg licensing
Hi Tony, I saw this file at the FSC. I noticed the licence tag you put on it and I see that you're quite experienced with featured sounds. Do you know anything about the consensus regarding the tag (if it has been discussed here or at commons?) and whether or not it accurately portrays the state of music recordings and public domain in the US? I always figured that typical sound recordings were considered copyrighted unless there is evidence to the contrary, and others that I've talked to have thought the same. This tag (unless I'm misreading it) implies that all recordings of music written up to 1911 would be public domain when recorded up to 1972... which just doesn't sound accurate. If this tag is acceptable then I could upload lots of great sound files, but I wouldn't want them to be deleted at a later date if the tag doesn't represent copyright law. Them From  Space  11:56, 25 May 2011 (UTC)

Hi Tony!
Someone keeps trying to delete http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Omniscient_technology. Sigh. I can never get over jealous people that only want to be destructive and not constructuve. Guess they never enjoyed any real success of their own :( Can you help keep it up? Thanks! Ron — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.198.22.63 (talk) 19:43, 25 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Consider Rescue--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 20:07, 25 May 2011 (UTC)

Your page about your Poker games
Hi, Tony. Don't you consider User:TonyTheTiger/Poker template inappropriate for Wikipedia (even for userspace)?

Would you agree to move it somewhere else on the web? Thanks, --<span style="padding:0.1em 1em;background-color:blue;color:white;border:0.2em solid red;border-left:border:0.5em double red;font-weight:bold">Damiens .rf 15:26, 26 May 2011 (UTC) I have had this debate before. Basically, userfied my bio several years ago. Recently, I began detailing my online poker experience in a highly detailed manner that might not be inappropriate on WP if I was notable. I am going to trim it down some because it has gotten too long.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 15:33, 26 May 2011 (UTC)
 * I would say it would be inappropriate even for a notable person. I suggest you completely remove it, since it's so distant of encyclopedic purposes. So, would you delete it? --<span style="padding:0.1em 1em;background-color:blue;color:white;border:0.2em solid red;border-left:border:0.5em double red;font-weight:bold">Damiens .rf 22:24, 30 May 2011 (UTC)
 * If statistics and results about poker are things notable people have in their bios and things can be sourced, then it's would not be too much for a notable person. I don't know if you have ever seen any of my content creation, but I often produce vast amounts of content with far greater detail than anyone would have believed was worth producing.  See people like Rob Pelinka and Tai Streets who have extensive details of high school careers that many might be surprised to find.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 22:42, 30 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Well, I know the rules about userspace are lax and rarely enforced, but I would feel bad if I didn't try. I'm posting it to MfD. I hope you don't take it personally. --<span style="padding:0.1em 1em;background-color:blue;color:white;border:0.2em solid red;border-left:border:0.5em double red;font-weight:bold">Damiens .rf 23:21, 30 May 2011 (UTC)

File:McCarthy Building image2.jpg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:McCarthy Building image2.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. <span style="padding:0.1em 1em;background-color:blue;color:white;border:0.2em solid red;border-left:border:0.5em double red;font-weight:bold">Damiens .rf 15:58, 26 May 2011 (UTC)

License tagging for File:I Have A Dream sample.ogg
Thanks for uploading File:I Have A Dream sample.ogg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 21:08, 26 May 2011 (UTC)

Re: Commons:File mover
Hi Tony, you don't need to be an admin there; you just need to be a file mover; you can request that right here. Graham 87 00:32, 27 May 2011 (UTC)


 * Done. Graham 87 00:58, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Not a problem. :-) However I'm not going to worry about the direct links to the image description page: there's no reason to delete the redirect and therefore not much insentive to "fix" those links. Graham 87 01:04, 27 May 2011 (UTC)

File:1426.cover.jpg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:1426.cover.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. <span style="padding:0.1em 1em;background-color:blue;color:white;border:0.2em solid red;border-left:border:0.5em double red;font-weight:bold">Damiens .rf 16:06, 27 May 2011 (UTC)

File:It's About the Money.jpg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:It's About the Money.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. <span style="padding:0.1em 1em;background-color:blue;color:white;border:0.2em solid red;border-left:border:0.5em double red;font-weight:bold">Damiens .rf 16:06, 27 May 2011 (UTC)

File:Ged mich bb.jpg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Ged mich bb.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. <span style="padding:0.1em 1em;background-color:blue;color:white;border:0.2em solid red;border-left:border:0.5em double red;font-weight:bold">Damiens .rf 16:09, 27 May 2011 (UTC)

FSC vote
Hi Tony,

I've just clarified my FSC vote. Thanks. Ben (Major Bloodnok) (talk) 19:50, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
 * I don't know for certain, but here in the UK it's exam season, so maybe thay're all revising... Ben (Major Bloodnok) (talk) 07:07, 29 May 2011 (UTC)

Documentary templates
I spent quite a bit of work on those. They could have used some work, but why delete and recreate them instead of just edited them? Donmike10 (talk) 22:39, 27 May 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Fedkiw Book.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Fedkiw Book.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude2 (talk) 05:34, 28 May 2011 (UTC)

Othello
Hi Tony, could you check the James Earl Jones sound file link on the Othello (character) page. It doesn't work for me, though other article sound files do. Cheers. Span (talk) 16:10, 29 May 2011 (UTC)
 * OK. Just checking. Thanks. Span (talk) 16:18, 29 May 2011 (UTC)
 * The audio now works fine. Not the video. Span (talk) 16:33, 29 May 2011 (UTC)


 * Unclear how/why that happened. I remember pruning the dead links at the bottom, but not removing the James Earl Jones clip. Deltabeignet (talk) 04:11, 30 May 2011 (UTC)

New FS!
— James (Talk • Contribs) • 5:14pm • 07:14, 30 May 2011 (UTC)

GA Bund Bull
I have placed the review on hold so that you can address some minor concerns. Racepacket (talk) 05:27, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
 * I understand your withdrawal. I have closed the review with a "fail" although that term does not reflect the great respect I have for all of your excellent work, particularly on Chicago-related articles. Perhaps you should write and then GA nominate some articles covering Chicago statues. Thanks, Racepacket (talk) 12:38, 31 May 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 30 May 2011
<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 20:34, 31 May 2011 (UTC)

WikiCup 2011 May newsletter
We're half way through round 3 of the 2011 WikiCup. There are currently 32 remaining in the competition, but only 16 will progress to our penultimate round. , of pool D, is our overall leader with nearly 200 points, while pools A, B and C are led by, and  respectively. The score required to reach the next round is 35, though this will no doubt go up significantly as the round progresses. We have a good number of high scorers, but also a considerable number who are yet to score. Please remember to submit content soon after it is promoted, so that the judges are able to review entries. Also, an important note concerning nominations at featured article candidates: if you are nominating content for which you intend to claim WikiCup points, please make this clear in the nomination statement so that the FAC director and his delegates are aware of the fact.

A running total of claims can be seen here. If you are concerned that your nomination will not receive the necessary reviews, and you hope to get it promoted before the end of the round, please list it on WikiCup/Reviews. However, please remember to continue to offer reviews at GAC, FAC and all the other pages that require them to prevent any backlogs which could otherwise be caused by the Cup. As ever, questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges are reachable on their talk pages, or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start receiving or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn and The ed17 23:38, 31 May 2011 (UTC)