User talk:Treisijs

Your invitation to participate in a Wikimedia-approved survey in online behavior.
Hello, my name is Michael Tsikerdekis, currently involved as a student in full time academic research at Masaryk University. I am writing to you to kindly invite you to participate in an online survey about interface and online collaboration on Wikipedia. The survey has been reviewed and approved by the Wikimedia Foundation Research Committee.

I am contacting you because you were randomly selected from a list of active editors. The survey should take about 7 to 10 minutes to complete, and it is very straightforward.

'''Wikipedia is an open project by nature. Let’s create new knowledge for everyone!''' :-)

To take part in the survey please follow the link: tsikerdekis.wuwcorp.com/pr/survey/?user=49022980 (HTTPS).

Best Regards, --Michael Tsikerdekis (talk) 12:04, 4 January 2012 (UTC)

PS: The results from the research will become available online for everyone and will be published in an open access journal.

UPDATE: This is the second and final notification for participating in this study. Your help is essential for having concrete results and knowledge that we all can share. I would like to thank you for your time and as always for any questions, comments or ideas do not hesitate to contact me. PS: As a thank you for your efforts and participation in Wikipedia Research you will receive a Research Participation Barnstar after the end of the study. --Michael Tsikerdekis (talk) 19:47, 15 February 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Viktors Spole for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Viktors Spole is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Viktors Spole until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Sir Sputnik (talk) 21:49, 5 December 2012 (UTC)

Wikidata
You need to be very careful about removing interwiki links. At 2012 Men's World Ice Hockey Championships, the links you removed were not on Wikidata. Once you removed them, no English Wikipedia pages pointed to them, since Wikidata is deployed to all English Wikipedia pages. On duck, many links clearly belonged there. Some were not on Wikidata at all despite your claim they all were, and some of those linked to Anatidae on Wikidata were linked incorrectly. At least, check that you don't entirely remove links from the English Wikipedia. &mdash;innotata 21:33, 27 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Ok! --Treisijs (talk) 06:37, 28 May 2013 (UTC)

Latvian help needed
Hello Treisijs, I'm contacting you because we need some Latvian translators to help with the deployment of the new VisualEditor on lv.wikipedia. There are help pages, user guides, and description pages that need translating, as well as the interface itself. The translating work is going on over on MediaWiki: Translation Central. I also need help with a personal message for the Latvian Wikipedians. If you are able to help in any way, either reply here, or head over to TranslationCentral. Thanks for your time, PEarley (WMF) (talk) 18:17, 16 August 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Cristián Torres


The article Cristián Torres has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 21:33, 14 May 2014 (UTC)

Latvian Football Cup
I am interested in Latvian Football Cup seasons, and there are a lot of red links, can you help create them ? You are from Latvia, you should improve your country articles. thanks--Alexiulian25 (talk) 19:05, 14 November 2015 (UTC)
 * I can do it, but not today... --Treisijs (talk) 15:25, 15 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Thanks! It will take long time, there are many seasons missing, but in time you can progress, you should start when you have time with the first seasons.--Alexiulian25 (talk) 16:23, 15 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:30, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Eirobaltija Riga
10 years and still almost no text. Is the subject notable?Xx236 (talk) 13:20, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
 * I would say not. -- Edgars2007  (talk/contribs) 13:27, 5 February 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Eirobaltija Riga for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Eirobaltija Riga is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Eirobaltija Riga until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.  Edgars2007  (talk/contribs) 07:56, 7 February 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:FC Caramba logo.png
 Thanks for uploading File:FC Caramba logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:42, 8 March 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Rigas Futbola skola logo.png
 Thanks for uploading File:Rigas Futbola skola logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:14, 6 May 2016 (UTC)

List of scandals with "-gate" suffix‎
Hello, I'm Woodroar. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person   on List of scandals with "-gate" suffix‎, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source, so I removed it. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Woodroar (talk) 23:08, 16 June 2017 (UTC)
 * see Latvian Wikipedia article lv:Jūrmalgeita. My English isn't the best... Maybe you can add this "-gate" with better English. This list with "-gate" I found accidentally, and I thought immediately about our "-gate". Please, can you use translation programme and add Jūrmalgeita to this list. --Treisijs (talk) 06:37, 17 June 2017 (UTC)
 * I read Jūrmalgeita on the Latvian Wikipedia and it does not meet our requirements for reliable sourcing. On the English Wikipedia, we avoid web portals (like Delfi) and news aggregators because they republish articles from different sources, so they don't have a "reputation for fact-checking and accuracy" (WP:V). Instead, we need to evaluate the author and publisher of the original source. Any claims about living persons require high-quality sources, and negative claims require high-quality sources from multiple publishers (WP:BLP). We also avoid machine translations (WP:MACHINETRANSLATION). Please let me know if you have any questions. Cheers! Woodroar (talk) 14:29, 17 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Ok... but that was very big scandal in Latvia. At that time (2005, 2006) one of top topic in Latvia. In my opinion, this scandal must be in this list. --Treisijs (talk) 20:46, 17 June 2017 (UTC)
 * It may have happened, but if reliable sources didn't cover it then we shouldn't, either. Remember that Existence ≠ Notability. Woodroar (talk) 23:19, 17 June 2017 (UTC)

Latvian biathlon
seeing as the IBU has not published the final qualifiers, could you either source your addition or remove it please.18abruce (talk) 17:09, 22 January 2018 (UTC)
 * , I add reference in Latvia at the 2018 Winter Olympics. Today Latvian Olympic Committee reported, who will go to Olympic Games. --Treisijs (talk) 17:44, 22 January 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of FK Hemat


The article FK Hemat has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "not notable footy team, amateur club, lacks sufficient coverage in reliable sources. does not meet notability"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -- Dloh cier ekim  (talk) 08:38, 7 October 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Aleksandr Mysikov


The article Aleksandr Mysikov has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Fails WP:NFOOTY as the RPFL is now not a WP:FPL league, and neither are Latvian Higher League and Kyrgyz Premier League."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

Geregen2 (talk) 15:27, 24 December 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Evgeni Kets


The article Evgeni Kets has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Fails WP:NFOOTY as Latvian Higher League is not a WP:FPL league."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

Geregen2 (talk) 16:29, 2 January 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Progression of Latvia association football caps record for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Progression of Latvia association football caps record is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Progression of Latvia association football caps record until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Spiderone 10:42, 10 October 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Progression of Australia association football goalscoring record for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Progression of Australia association football goalscoring record is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Progression of Australia association football goalscoring record until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Spiderone 11:17, 10 October 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Progression of Latvia association football goalscoring record for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Progression of Latvia association football goalscoring record is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Progression of Latvia association football goalscoring record until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Spiderone 16:13, 10 October 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Association football in Latvia lists


A tag has been placed on Category:Association football in Latvia lists requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 15:54, 29 October 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Latvia national football team lists


A tag has been placed on Category:Latvia national football team lists requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 16:54, 29 October 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of FK Latvijas finieris


The article FK Latvijas finieris has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "No sources, no indication of existence or importance."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Kazamzam (talk) 00:15, 14 October 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:30, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Nordeka LFKA


The article Nordeka LFKA has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Tagged in 2007 as uncited - we don’t know how Google and Bing rank articles - perhaps having articles tagged uncited for so many years drags down the reputation of Wikipedia as a whole"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Chidgk1 (talk) 11:19, 29 May 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:26, 28 November 2023 (UTC)